diff mbox series

[v16,07/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: activating CPU topology

Message ID 20230222142105.84700-8-pmorel@linux.ibm.com
State New
Headers show
Series s390x: CPU Topology | expand

Commit Message

Pierre Morel Feb. 22, 2023, 2:21 p.m. UTC
The KVM capability KVM_CAP_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY is used to
activate the S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY feature and
the topology facility in the host CPU model for the guest
in the case the topology is available in QEMU and in KVM.

The feature is disabled by default and fenced for SE
(secure execution).

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
---
 hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c   | 2 +-
 target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 1 +
 target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c    | 9 +++++++++
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Thomas Huth Feb. 27, 2023, 1:26 p.m. UTC | #1
On 22/02/2023 15.21, Pierre Morel wrote:
> The KVM capability KVM_CAP_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY is used to
> activate the S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY feature and
> the topology facility in the host CPU model for the guest
> in the case the topology is available in QEMU and in KVM.
> 
> The feature is disabled by default and fenced for SE
> (secure execution).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c   | 2 +-
>   target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 1 +
>   target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c    | 9 +++++++++
>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Maybe s/activating/activate/ in the subject?

Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Pierre Morel Feb. 27, 2023, 2:13 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2/27/23 14:26, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 22/02/2023 15.21, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> The KVM capability KVM_CAP_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY is used to
>> activate the S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY feature and
>> the topology facility in the host CPU model for the guest
>> in the case the topology is available in QEMU and in KVM.
>>
>> The feature is disabled by default and fenced for SE
>> (secure execution).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c   | 2 +-
>>   target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 1 +
>>   target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c    | 9 +++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Maybe s/activating/activate/ in the subject?


Yes, Thanks.


>
> Anyway:
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>
Thanks,


Regards,

Pierre
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
index 40253a2444..ed5fc75381 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@  int s390_socket_nb(S390CPU *cpu)
  */
 bool s390_has_topology(void)
 {
-    return false;
+    return s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
index 065ec6d66c..aca2c5c96b 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
@@ -254,6 +254,7 @@  bool s390_has_feat(S390Feat feat)
         case S390_FEAT_SIE_CMMA:
         case S390_FEAT_SIE_PFMFI:
         case S390_FEAT_SIE_IBS:
+        case S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY:
             return false;
             break;
         default:
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
index fb63be41b7..e6f5b65dbe 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -371,6 +371,7 @@  int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
     kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_S390_USER_SIGP, 0);
     kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VECTOR_REGISTERS, 0);
     kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI, 0);
+    kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY, 0);
     if (ri_allowed()) {
         if (kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_S390_RI, 0) == 0) {
             cap_ri = 1;
@@ -2470,6 +2471,14 @@  void kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model, Error **errp)
         set_bit(S390_FEAT_UNPACK, model->features);
     }
 
+    /*
+     * If we have kernel support for CPU Topology indicate the
+     * configuration-topology facility.
+     */
+    if (kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY)) {
+        set_bit(S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY, model->features);
+    }
+
     /* We emulate a zPCI bus and AEN, therefore we don't need HW support */
     set_bit(S390_FEAT_ZPCI, model->features);
     set_bit(S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_EVENT_NOTIFICATION, model->features);