diff mbox series

hw/intc: sifive_plic: Renumber the S irqs for numa support

Message ID 20221111121913.1531030-1-frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
State New
Headers show
Series hw/intc: sifive_plic: Renumber the S irqs for numa support | expand

Commit Message

Frédéric Pétrot Nov. 11, 2022, 12:19 p.m. UTC
Commit 40244040 changed the way the S irqs are numbered. This breaks when
using numa configuration, e.g.:
./qemu-system-riscv64 -nographic -machine virt,dumpdtb=numa-tree.dtb \
                      -m 2G -smp cpus=16 \
		      -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M \
		      -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=512M \
		      -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem2,size=512M \
		      -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem3,size=512M \
		      -numa node,cpus=0-3,memdev=mem0,nodeid=0 \
		      -numa node,cpus=4-7,memdev=mem1,nodeid=1 \
		      -numa node,cpus=8-11,memdev=mem2,nodeid=2 \
		      -numa node,cpus=12-15,memdev=mem3,nodeid=3
leads to:
Unexpected error in object_property_find_err() at ../qom/object.c:1304:
qemu-system-riscv64: Property 'riscv.sifive.plic.unnamed-gpio-out[8]' not
found

This patch makes the nubering of the S irqs identical to what it was before.

Signed-off-by: Frédéric Pétrot <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>
---
 hw/intc/sifive_plic.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Alistair Francis Nov. 14, 2022, 1:18 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 10:20 PM Frédéric Pétrot
<frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
>
> Commit 40244040 changed the way the S irqs are numbered. This breaks when
> using numa configuration, e.g.:
> ./qemu-system-riscv64 -nographic -machine virt,dumpdtb=numa-tree.dtb \
>                       -m 2G -smp cpus=16 \
>                       -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M \
>                       -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=512M \
>                       -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem2,size=512M \
>                       -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem3,size=512M \
>                       -numa node,cpus=0-3,memdev=mem0,nodeid=0 \
>                       -numa node,cpus=4-7,memdev=mem1,nodeid=1 \
>                       -numa node,cpus=8-11,memdev=mem2,nodeid=2 \
>                       -numa node,cpus=12-15,memdev=mem3,nodeid=3
> leads to:
> Unexpected error in object_property_find_err() at ../qom/object.c:1304:
> qemu-system-riscv64: Property 'riscv.sifive.plic.unnamed-gpio-out[8]' not
> found
>
> This patch makes the nubering of the S irqs identical to what it was before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frédéric Pétrot <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  hw/intc/sifive_plic.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> index c2dfacf028..89d2122742 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ DeviceState *sifive_plic_create(hwaddr addr, char *hart_config,
>                                    qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_M_EXT));
>          }
>          if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_S) {
> -            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num,
> +            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - plic->hartid_base,
>                                    qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_S_EXT));
>          }
>      }
> --
> 2.37.2
>
>
Alistair Francis Nov. 14, 2022, 2:11 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 10:20 PM Frédéric Pétrot
<frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
>
> Commit 40244040 changed the way the S irqs are numbered. This breaks when
> using numa configuration, e.g.:
> ./qemu-system-riscv64 -nographic -machine virt,dumpdtb=numa-tree.dtb \
>                       -m 2G -smp cpus=16 \
>                       -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M \
>                       -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=512M \
>                       -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem2,size=512M \
>                       -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem3,size=512M \
>                       -numa node,cpus=0-3,memdev=mem0,nodeid=0 \
>                       -numa node,cpus=4-7,memdev=mem1,nodeid=1 \
>                       -numa node,cpus=8-11,memdev=mem2,nodeid=2 \
>                       -numa node,cpus=12-15,memdev=mem3,nodeid=3
> leads to:
> Unexpected error in object_property_find_err() at ../qom/object.c:1304:
> qemu-system-riscv64: Property 'riscv.sifive.plic.unnamed-gpio-out[8]' not
> found
>
> This patch makes the nubering of the S irqs identical to what it was before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frédéric Pétrot <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>

Thanks!

Applied to riscv-to-apply.next

Alistair

> ---
>  hw/intc/sifive_plic.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> index c2dfacf028..89d2122742 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ DeviceState *sifive_plic_create(hwaddr addr, char *hart_config,
>                                    qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_M_EXT));
>          }
>          if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_S) {
> -            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num,
> +            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - plic->hartid_base,
>                                    qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_S_EXT));
>          }
>      }
> --
> 2.37.2
>
>
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Nov. 14, 2022, 8:40 a.m. UTC | #3
On 11/11/22 13:19, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
> Commit 40244040 changed the way the S irqs are numbered. This breaks when

40244040a7 in case?

> using numa configuration, e.g.:
> ./qemu-system-riscv64 -nographic -machine virt,dumpdtb=numa-tree.dtb \
>                        -m 2G -smp cpus=16 \
> 		      -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M \
> 		      -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=512M \
> 		      -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem2,size=512M \
> 		      -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem3,size=512M \
> 		      -numa node,cpus=0-3,memdev=mem0,nodeid=0 \
> 		      -numa node,cpus=4-7,memdev=mem1,nodeid=1 \
> 		      -numa node,cpus=8-11,memdev=mem2,nodeid=2 \
> 		      -numa node,cpus=12-15,memdev=mem3,nodeid=3
> leads to:
> Unexpected error in object_property_find_err() at ../qom/object.c:1304:
> qemu-system-riscv64: Property 'riscv.sifive.plic.unnamed-gpio-out[8]' not
> found
> 
> This patch makes the nubering of the S irqs identical to what it was before.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frédéric Pétrot <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>
> ---
>   hw/intc/sifive_plic.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> index c2dfacf028..89d2122742 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ DeviceState *sifive_plic_create(hwaddr addr, char *hart_config,
>                                     qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_M_EXT));
>           }
>           if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_S) {
> -            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num,
> +            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - plic->hartid_base,
>                                     qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_S_EXT));
>           }
>       }

Oops.

Eventually we could unify the style:

-- >8 --
@@ -476,11 +476,11 @@ DeviceState *sifive_plic_create(hwaddr addr, char 
*hart_config,
          CPUState *cpu = qemu_get_cpu(cpu_num);

          if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_M) {
-            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, num_harts - plic->hartid_base + 
cpu_num,
+            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - hartid_base + num_harts,
                                    qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), 
IRQ_M_EXT));
          }
          if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_S) {
-            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num,
+            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - hartid_base,
                                    qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), 
IRQ_S_EXT));
          }
      }
---

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Frédéric Pétrot Nov. 14, 2022, 10:34 a.m. UTC | #4
Le 14/11/2022 à 09:40, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
> On 11/11/22 13:19, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
>> Commit 40244040 changed the way the S irqs are numbered. This breaks when
> 
> 40244040a7 in case?

   Seems reasonnable, indeed, I'll even align with what git blame shows
   (11 chars, so 40244040a7a).

>> using numa configuration, e.g.:
>> ./qemu-system-riscv64 -nographic -machine virt,dumpdtb=numa-tree.dtb \
>>                        -m 2G -smp cpus=16 \
>>               -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M \
>>               -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=512M \
>>               -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem2,size=512M \
>>               -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem3,size=512M \
>>               -numa node,cpus=0-3,memdev=mem0,nodeid=0 \
>>               -numa node,cpus=4-7,memdev=mem1,nodeid=1 \
>>               -numa node,cpus=8-11,memdev=mem2,nodeid=2 \
>>               -numa node,cpus=12-15,memdev=mem3,nodeid=3
>> leads to:
>> Unexpected error in object_property_find_err() at ../qom/object.c:1304:
>> qemu-system-riscv64: Property 'riscv.sifive.plic.unnamed-gpio-out[8]' not
>> found
>>
>> This patch makes the nubering of the S irqs identical to what it was before.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frédéric Pétrot <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>
>> ---
>>   hw/intc/sifive_plic.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
>> index c2dfacf028..89d2122742 100644
>> --- a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
>> +++ b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
>> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ DeviceState *sifive_plic_create(hwaddr addr, char 
>> *hart_config,
>>                                     qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_M_EXT));
>>           }
>>           if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_S) {
>> -            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num,
>> +            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - plic->hartid_base,
>>                                     qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_S_EXT));
>>           }
>>       }
> 
> Oops. >
> Eventually we could unify the style:
> 
> -- >8 --
> @@ -476,11 +476,11 @@ DeviceState *sifive_plic_create(hwaddr addr, char 
> *hart_config,
>           CPUState *cpu = qemu_get_cpu(cpu_num);
> 
>           if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_M) {
> -            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, num_harts - plic->hartid_base + cpu_num,
> +            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - hartid_base + num_harts,
>                                     qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_M_EXT));
>           }
>           if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_S) {
> -            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num,
> +            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - hartid_base,hartid_base
>                                     qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_S_EXT));
>           }
>       }
> ---

   IIUC hartid_base is used to set plic->hartid_base, so agreed, along with the
   style unification.
   I'll send a v2, then.
   Since Alistair already queued the patch, how shall I proceed?
> 
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
>
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Nov. 14, 2022, 12:24 p.m. UTC | #5
On 14/11/22 11:34, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
> Le 14/11/2022 à 09:40, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
>> On 11/11/22 13:19, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:


>> Eventually we could unify the style:
>>
>> -- >8 --
>> @@ -476,11 +476,11 @@ DeviceState *sifive_plic_create(hwaddr addr, 
>> char *hart_config,
>>           CPUState *cpu = qemu_get_cpu(cpu_num);
>>
>>           if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_M) {
>> -            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, num_harts - plic->hartid_base 
>> + cpu_num,
>> +            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - hartid_base + 
>> num_harts,
>>                                     qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), 
>> IRQ_M_EXT));
>>           }
>>           if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_S) {
>> -            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num,
>> +            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - hartid_base,hartid_base
>>                                     qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), 
>> IRQ_S_EXT));
>>           }
>>       }
>> ---
> 
>    IIUC hartid_base is used to set plic->hartid_base, so agreed, along 
> with the
>    style unification.
>    I'll send a v2, then.
>    Since Alistair already queued the patch, how shall I proceed?

I didn't notice Alistair queued (he usually send a notification by
responding "queued" to the patches). If it is queued, then too late
(and not a big deal) -- you can still post the v2 and let him pick
it :)
Alistair Francis Nov. 15, 2022, 4:03 a.m. UTC | #6
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 9:56 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
<philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 14/11/22 11:34, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
> > Le 14/11/2022 à 09:40, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
> >> On 11/11/22 13:19, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
>
>
> >> Eventually we could unify the style:
> >>
> >> -- >8 --
> >> @@ -476,11 +476,11 @@ DeviceState *sifive_plic_create(hwaddr addr,
> >> char *hart_config,
> >>           CPUState *cpu = qemu_get_cpu(cpu_num);
> >>
> >>           if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_M) {
> >> -            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, num_harts - plic->hartid_base
> >> + cpu_num,
> >> +            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - hartid_base +
> >> num_harts,
> >>                                     qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu),
> >> IRQ_M_EXT));
> >>           }
> >>           if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_S) {
> >> -            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num,
> >> +            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - hartid_base,hartid_base
> >>                                     qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu),
> >> IRQ_S_EXT));
> >>           }
> >>       }
> >> ---
> >
> >    IIUC hartid_base is used to set plic->hartid_base, so agreed, along
> > with the
> >    style unification.
> >    I'll send a v2, then.
> >    Since Alistair already queued the patch, how shall I proceed?
>
> I didn't notice Alistair queued (he usually send a notification by
> responding "queued" to the patches). If it is queued, then too late
> (and not a big deal) -- you can still post the v2 and let him pick
> it :)

Yep! I'll drop it from my queue and take the v2

Alistair

>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
index c2dfacf028..89d2122742 100644
--- a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@  DeviceState *sifive_plic_create(hwaddr addr, char *hart_config,
                                   qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_M_EXT));
         }
         if (plic->addr_config[i].mode == PLICMode_S) {
-            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num,
+            qdev_connect_gpio_out(dev, cpu_num - plic->hartid_base,
                                   qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), IRQ_S_EXT));
         }
     }