Message ID | 20211007162406.1920374-5-lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | hw/nvme: SR-IOV with Virtualization Enhancements | expand |
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 06:23:55PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > PCIe devices implementing SR-IOV may need to perform certain actions > before the VFs are unrealized or vice versa. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Maniak <lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com> Callbacks are annoying and easy to misuse though. VFs are enabled through a config cycle, we generally just have devices invoke the capability handler. E.g. static void pci_bridge_dev_write_config(PCIDevice *d, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) { pci_bridge_write_config(d, address, val, len); if (msi_present(d)) { msi_write_config(d, address, val, len); } } this makes it easy to do whatever you want before/after the write. You can also add a helper to check that SRIOV is being enabled/disabled if necessary. > --- > docs/pcie_sriov.txt | 2 +- > hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h | 8 +++++++- > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > index f5e891e1d4..63ca1a7b8e 100644 > --- a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > +++ b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ setting up a BAR for a VF. > /* Add and initialize the SR/IOV capability */ > pcie_sriov_pf_init(d, 0x200, "your_virtual_dev", > vf_devid, initial_vfs, total_vfs, > - fun_offset, stride); > + fun_offset, stride, pre_vfs_update_cb); > > /* Set up individual VF BARs (parameters as for normal BARs) */ > pcie_sriov_pf_init_vf_bar( ... ) > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > index 501a1ff433..cac2aee061 100644 > --- a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev); > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride) > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update) > { > uint8_t *cfg = dev->config + offset; > uint8_t *wmask; > @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs = 0; > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname = g_strdup(vfname); > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf = NULL; > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update = pre_vfs_update; > > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET, vf_offset); > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_STRIDE, vf_stride); > @@ -180,6 +182,11 @@ static void register_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > assert(dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf); > > trace_sriov_register_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > + > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, num_vfs); > + } > + > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i] = register_vf(dev, devfn, dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname, i); > if (!dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]) { > @@ -198,6 +205,11 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > uint16_t i; > > trace_sriov_unregister_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > + > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, 0); > + } > + > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > PCIDevice *vf = dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]; > object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(vf), "realized", false, &local_err); > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > index 0974f00054..9ab48b79c0 100644 > --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > @@ -13,11 +13,16 @@ > #ifndef QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > #define QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > > +typedef void (*SriovVfsUpdate)(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t prev_num_vfs, > + uint16_t num_vfs); > + > struct PCIESriovPF { > uint16_t num_vfs; /* Number of virtual functions created */ > uint8_t vf_bar_type[PCI_NUM_REGIONS]; /* Store type for each VF bar */ > const char *vfname; /* Reference to the device type used for the VFs */ > PCIDevice **vf; /* Pointer to an array of num_vfs VF devices */ > + > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update; /* Callback preceding VFs count change */ > }; > > struct PCIESriovVF { > @@ -28,7 +33,8 @@ struct PCIESriovVF { > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride); > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update); > void pcie_sriov_pf_exit(PCIDevice *dev); > > /* Set up a VF bar in the SR/IOV bar area */ > -- > 2.25.1
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:25:12AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 06:23:55PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > > PCIe devices implementing SR-IOV may need to perform certain actions > > before the VFs are unrealized or vice versa. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Maniak <lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com> > > Callbacks are annoying and easy to misuse though. > VFs are enabled through a config cycle, we generally just > have devices invoke the capability handler. > E.g. > > static void pci_bridge_dev_write_config(PCIDevice *d, > uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > { > pci_bridge_write_config(d, address, val, len); > if (msi_present(d)) { > msi_write_config(d, address, val, len); > } > } > > this makes it easy to do whatever you want before/after > the write. You can also add a helper to check > that SRIOV is being enabled/disabled if necessary. > > > --- > > docs/pcie_sriov.txt | 2 +- > > hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > > include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h | 8 +++++++- > > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > index f5e891e1d4..63ca1a7b8e 100644 > > --- a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > +++ b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ setting up a BAR for a VF. > > /* Add and initialize the SR/IOV capability */ > > pcie_sriov_pf_init(d, 0x200, "your_virtual_dev", > > vf_devid, initial_vfs, total_vfs, > > - fun_offset, stride); > > + fun_offset, stride, pre_vfs_update_cb); > > > > /* Set up individual VF BARs (parameters as for normal BARs) */ > > pcie_sriov_pf_init_vf_bar( ... ) > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > index 501a1ff433..cac2aee061 100644 > > --- a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev); > > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride) > > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update) > > { > > uint8_t *cfg = dev->config + offset; > > uint8_t *wmask; > > @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs = 0; > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname = g_strdup(vfname); > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf = NULL; > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update = pre_vfs_update; > > > > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET, vf_offset); > > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_STRIDE, vf_stride); > > @@ -180,6 +182,11 @@ static void register_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > > assert(dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf); > > > > trace_sriov_register_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > > + > > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, num_vfs); > > + } > > + > > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i] = register_vf(dev, devfn, dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname, i); > > if (!dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]) { > > @@ -198,6 +205,11 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > > uint16_t i; > > > > trace_sriov_unregister_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > > + > > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, 0); > > + } > > + > > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > > PCIDevice *vf = dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]; > > object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(vf), "realized", false, &local_err); > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > index 0974f00054..9ab48b79c0 100644 > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > @@ -13,11 +13,16 @@ > > #ifndef QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > > #define QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > > > > +typedef void (*SriovVfsUpdate)(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t prev_num_vfs, > > + uint16_t num_vfs); > > + > > struct PCIESriovPF { > > uint16_t num_vfs; /* Number of virtual functions created */ > > uint8_t vf_bar_type[PCI_NUM_REGIONS]; /* Store type for each VF bar */ > > const char *vfname; /* Reference to the device type used for the VFs */ > > PCIDevice **vf; /* Pointer to an array of num_vfs VF devices */ > > + > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update; /* Callback preceding VFs count change */ > > }; > > > > struct PCIESriovVF { > > @@ -28,7 +33,8 @@ struct PCIESriovVF { > > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride); > > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update); > > void pcie_sriov_pf_exit(PCIDevice *dev); > > > > /* Set up a VF bar in the SR/IOV bar area */ > > -- > > 2.25.1 > Hi Michael, A custom config_write callback was the first approach we used. However, once implemented, we realized it looks the same as the pcie_sriov_config_write function. To avoid code duplication and interfering with the internal SR-IOV structures for purposes of NVMe, we opted for this callback prior to the VFs update. After all, we have callbacks in both approaches, config_write and the added pre_vfs_update, so both are prone to misuse. But I agree it may not be a good moment yet to add a new API specifically for SR-IOV functionality, as NVMe will be the first device to use it. CCing Knut, perhaps as the author of SR-IOV you have some thoughts on how the device notification of an upcoming VFs update would be handled. Thanks, Lukasz
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 06:06:46PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:25:12AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 06:23:55PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > > > PCIe devices implementing SR-IOV may need to perform certain actions > > > before the VFs are unrealized or vice versa. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Maniak <lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com> > > > > Callbacks are annoying and easy to misuse though. > > VFs are enabled through a config cycle, we generally just > > have devices invoke the capability handler. > > E.g. > > > > static void pci_bridge_dev_write_config(PCIDevice *d, > > uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > { > > pci_bridge_write_config(d, address, val, len); > > if (msi_present(d)) { > > msi_write_config(d, address, val, len); > > } > > } > > > > this makes it easy to do whatever you want before/after > > the write. You can also add a helper to check > > that SRIOV is being enabled/disabled if necessary. > > > > > --- > > > docs/pcie_sriov.txt | 2 +- > > > hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > > > include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h | 8 +++++++- > > > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > index f5e891e1d4..63ca1a7b8e 100644 > > > --- a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > +++ b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ setting up a BAR for a VF. > > > /* Add and initialize the SR/IOV capability */ > > > pcie_sriov_pf_init(d, 0x200, "your_virtual_dev", > > > vf_devid, initial_vfs, total_vfs, > > > - fun_offset, stride); > > > + fun_offset, stride, pre_vfs_update_cb); > > > > > > /* Set up individual VF BARs (parameters as for normal BARs) */ > > > pcie_sriov_pf_init_vf_bar( ... ) > > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > index 501a1ff433..cac2aee061 100644 > > > --- a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev); > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > > > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > > > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride) > > > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update) > > > { > > > uint8_t *cfg = dev->config + offset; > > > uint8_t *wmask; > > > @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs = 0; > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname = g_strdup(vfname); > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf = NULL; > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update = pre_vfs_update; > > > > > > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET, vf_offset); > > > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_STRIDE, vf_stride); > > > @@ -180,6 +182,11 @@ static void register_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > > > assert(dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf); > > > > > > trace_sriov_register_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > > > + > > > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, num_vfs); > > > + } > > > + > > > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i] = register_vf(dev, devfn, dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname, i); > > > if (!dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]) { > > > @@ -198,6 +205,11 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > > > uint16_t i; > > > > > > trace_sriov_unregister_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > > > + > > > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, 0); > > > + } > > > + > > > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > > > PCIDevice *vf = dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]; > > > object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(vf), "realized", false, &local_err); > > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > index 0974f00054..9ab48b79c0 100644 > > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > @@ -13,11 +13,16 @@ > > > #ifndef QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > > > #define QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > > > > > > +typedef void (*SriovVfsUpdate)(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t prev_num_vfs, > > > + uint16_t num_vfs); > > > + > > > struct PCIESriovPF { > > > uint16_t num_vfs; /* Number of virtual functions created */ > > > uint8_t vf_bar_type[PCI_NUM_REGIONS]; /* Store type for each VF bar */ > > > const char *vfname; /* Reference to the device type used for the VFs */ > > > PCIDevice **vf; /* Pointer to an array of num_vfs VF devices */ > > > + > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update; /* Callback preceding VFs count change */ > > > }; > > > > > > struct PCIESriovVF { > > > @@ -28,7 +33,8 @@ struct PCIESriovVF { > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > > > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > > > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride); > > > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update); > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_exit(PCIDevice *dev); > > > > > > /* Set up a VF bar in the SR/IOV bar area */ > > > -- > > > 2.25.1 > > > > Hi Michael, > > A custom config_write callback was the first approach we used. > However, once implemented, we realized it looks the same as the > pcie_sriov_config_write function. To avoid code duplication and > interfering with the internal SR-IOV structures for purposes of NVMe, > we opted for this callback prior to the VFs update. > After all, we have callbacks in both approaches, config_write and the > added pre_vfs_update, so both are prone to misuse. > > But I agree it may not be a good moment yet to add a new API > specifically for SR-IOV functionality, as NVMe will be the first device > to use it. > > CCing Knut, perhaps as the author of SR-IOV you have some thoughts on > how the device notification of an upcoming VFs update would be handled. > > Thanks, > Lukasz So just split it up? void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) { uint32_t off; uint16_t sriov_cap = dev->exp.sriov_cap; if (!sriov_cap || address < sriov_cap) { return; } off = address - sriov_cap; if (off >= PCI_EXT_CAP_SRIOV_SIZEOF) { return; } trace_sriov_config_write(SRIOV_ID(dev), off, val, len); if (range_covers_byte(off, len, PCI_SRIOV_CTRL)) { if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs) { if (!(val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE)) { unregister_vfs(dev); } } else { if (val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) { register_vfs(dev); } } } } Would become: bool pcie_sriov_is_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) { uint32_t off; uint16_t sriov_cap = dev->exp.sriov_cap; if (!sriov_cap || address < sriov_cap) { return false; } off = address - sriov_cap; if (off >= PCI_EXT_CAP_SRIOV_SIZEOF) { return false; } } bool pcie_sriov_do_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) { trace_sriov_config_write(SRIOV_ID(dev), off, val, len); if (range_covers_byte(off, len, PCI_SRIOV_CTRL)) { if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs) { if (!(val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE)) { unregister_vfs(dev); } } else { if (val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) { register_vfs(dev); } } } } void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) { if (pcie_sriov_is_config_write(dev, address, val, len)) { pcie_sriov_do_config_write(dev, address, val, len); } } Now pcie_sriov_is_config_write and pcie_sriov_do_config_write can be reused by NVME.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 05:10:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 06:06:46PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:25:12AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 06:23:55PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > > > > PCIe devices implementing SR-IOV may need to perform certain actions > > > > before the VFs are unrealized or vice versa. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Maniak <lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > Callbacks are annoying and easy to misuse though. > > > VFs are enabled through a config cycle, we generally just > > > have devices invoke the capability handler. > > > E.g. > > > > > > static void pci_bridge_dev_write_config(PCIDevice *d, > > > uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > > { > > > pci_bridge_write_config(d, address, val, len); > > > if (msi_present(d)) { > > > msi_write_config(d, address, val, len); > > > } > > > } > > > > > > this makes it easy to do whatever you want before/after > > > the write. You can also add a helper to check > > > that SRIOV is being enabled/disabled if necessary. > > > > > > > --- > > > > docs/pcie_sriov.txt | 2 +- > > > > hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > > > > include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h | 8 +++++++- > > > > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > > index f5e891e1d4..63ca1a7b8e 100644 > > > > --- a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > > +++ b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ setting up a BAR for a VF. > > > > /* Add and initialize the SR/IOV capability */ > > > > pcie_sriov_pf_init(d, 0x200, "your_virtual_dev", > > > > vf_devid, initial_vfs, total_vfs, > > > > - fun_offset, stride); > > > > + fun_offset, stride, pre_vfs_update_cb); > > > > > > > > /* Set up individual VF BARs (parameters as for normal BARs) */ > > > > pcie_sriov_pf_init_vf_bar( ... ) > > > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > > index 501a1ff433..cac2aee061 100644 > > > > --- a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev); > > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > > > > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > > > > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride) > > > > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update) > > > > { > > > > uint8_t *cfg = dev->config + offset; > > > > uint8_t *wmask; > > > > @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs = 0; > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname = g_strdup(vfname); > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf = NULL; > > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update = pre_vfs_update; > > > > > > > > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET, vf_offset); > > > > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_STRIDE, vf_stride); > > > > @@ -180,6 +182,11 @@ static void register_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > > > > assert(dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf); > > > > > > > > trace_sriov_register_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > > > > + > > > > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, num_vfs); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i] = register_vf(dev, devfn, dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname, i); > > > > if (!dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]) { > > > > @@ -198,6 +205,11 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > > > > uint16_t i; > > > > > > > > trace_sriov_unregister_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > > > > + > > > > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, 0); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > > > > PCIDevice *vf = dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]; > > > > object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(vf), "realized", false, &local_err); > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > > index 0974f00054..9ab48b79c0 100644 > > > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > > @@ -13,11 +13,16 @@ > > > > #ifndef QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > > > > #define QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > > > > > > > > +typedef void (*SriovVfsUpdate)(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t prev_num_vfs, > > > > + uint16_t num_vfs); > > > > + > > > > struct PCIESriovPF { > > > > uint16_t num_vfs; /* Number of virtual functions created */ > > > > uint8_t vf_bar_type[PCI_NUM_REGIONS]; /* Store type for each VF bar */ > > > > const char *vfname; /* Reference to the device type used for the VFs */ > > > > PCIDevice **vf; /* Pointer to an array of num_vfs VF devices */ > > > > + > > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update; /* Callback preceding VFs count change */ > > > > }; > > > > > > > > struct PCIESriovVF { > > > > @@ -28,7 +33,8 @@ struct PCIESriovVF { > > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > > > > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > > > > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride); > > > > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update); > > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_exit(PCIDevice *dev); > > > > > > > > /* Set up a VF bar in the SR/IOV bar area */ > > > > -- > > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > A custom config_write callback was the first approach we used. > > However, once implemented, we realized it looks the same as the > > pcie_sriov_config_write function. To avoid code duplication and > > interfering with the internal SR-IOV structures for purposes of NVMe, > > we opted for this callback prior to the VFs update. > > After all, we have callbacks in both approaches, config_write and the > > added pre_vfs_update, so both are prone to misuse. > > > > But I agree it may not be a good moment yet to add a new API > > specifically for SR-IOV functionality, as NVMe will be the first device > > to use it. > > > > CCing Knut, perhaps as the author of SR-IOV you have some thoughts on > > how the device notification of an upcoming VFs update would be handled. > > > > Thanks, > > Lukasz > > So just split it up? > > void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > { > uint32_t off; > uint16_t sriov_cap = dev->exp.sriov_cap; > > if (!sriov_cap || address < sriov_cap) { > return; > } > off = address - sriov_cap; > if (off >= PCI_EXT_CAP_SRIOV_SIZEOF) { > return; > } > > trace_sriov_config_write(SRIOV_ID(dev), off, val, len); > > if (range_covers_byte(off, len, PCI_SRIOV_CTRL)) { > if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs) { > if (!(val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE)) { > unregister_vfs(dev); > } > } else { > if (val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) { > register_vfs(dev); > } > } > } > } > > > Would become: > > bool > pcie_sriov_is_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > { > uint32_t off; > uint16_t sriov_cap = dev->exp.sriov_cap; > > if (!sriov_cap || address < sriov_cap) { > return false; > } > off = address - sriov_cap; > if (off >= PCI_EXT_CAP_SRIOV_SIZEOF) { > return false; > } > } > > bool > pcie_sriov_do_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > { > trace_sriov_config_write(SRIOV_ID(dev), off, val, len); > > if (range_covers_byte(off, len, PCI_SRIOV_CTRL)) { > if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs) { > if (!(val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE)) { > unregister_vfs(dev); > } > } else { > if (val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) { > register_vfs(dev); > } > } > } > } > > > > void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > { > if (pcie_sriov_is_config_write(dev, address, val, len)) { > pcie_sriov_do_config_write(dev, address, val, len); > } > > } > > > Now pcie_sriov_is_config_write and pcie_sriov_do_config_write > can be reused by NVME. > > -- > MST > Hi Michael, I extracted one condition to the helper, what do you think? bool pcie_sriov_is_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) { uint32_t off; uint16_t sriov_cap = dev->exp.sriov_cap; if (!sriov_cap || address < sriov_cap) { return false; } off = address - sriov_cap; if (off >= PCI_EXT_CAP_SRIOV_SIZEOF) { return false; } if (range_covers_byte(off, len, PCI_SRIOV_CTRL)) { return true; } return false; } static void pcie_sriov_do_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) { uint32_t off = address - dev->exp.sriov_cap; trace_sriov_config_write(SRIOV_ID(dev), off, val, len); if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs) { if (!(val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE)) { unregister_vfs(dev); } } else { if (val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) { register_vfs(dev); } } } void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) { if (pcie_sriov_is_config_write(dev, address, val, len)) { pcie_sriov_do_config_write(dev, address, val, len); } } -- Lukasz
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 06:24:14PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 05:10:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 06:06:46PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:25:12AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 06:23:55PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > > > > > PCIe devices implementing SR-IOV may need to perform certain actions > > > > > before the VFs are unrealized or vice versa. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Maniak <lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > > > Callbacks are annoying and easy to misuse though. > > > > VFs are enabled through a config cycle, we generally just > > > > have devices invoke the capability handler. > > > > E.g. > > > > > > > > static void pci_bridge_dev_write_config(PCIDevice *d, > > > > uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > > > { > > > > pci_bridge_write_config(d, address, val, len); > > > > if (msi_present(d)) { > > > > msi_write_config(d, address, val, len); > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > > > this makes it easy to do whatever you want before/after > > > > the write. You can also add a helper to check > > > > that SRIOV is being enabled/disabled if necessary. > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > docs/pcie_sriov.txt | 2 +- > > > > > hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > > > > > include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h | 8 +++++++- > > > > > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > > > index f5e891e1d4..63ca1a7b8e 100644 > > > > > --- a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > > > +++ b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > > > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ setting up a BAR for a VF. > > > > > /* Add and initialize the SR/IOV capability */ > > > > > pcie_sriov_pf_init(d, 0x200, "your_virtual_dev", > > > > > vf_devid, initial_vfs, total_vfs, > > > > > - fun_offset, stride); > > > > > + fun_offset, stride, pre_vfs_update_cb); > > > > > > > > > > /* Set up individual VF BARs (parameters as for normal BARs) */ > > > > > pcie_sriov_pf_init_vf_bar( ... ) > > > > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > > > index 501a1ff433..cac2aee061 100644 > > > > > --- a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > > > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > > > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev); > > > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > > > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > > > > > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > > > > > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride) > > > > > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > > > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update) > > > > > { > > > > > uint8_t *cfg = dev->config + offset; > > > > > uint8_t *wmask; > > > > > @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs = 0; > > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname = g_strdup(vfname); > > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf = NULL; > > > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update = pre_vfs_update; > > > > > > > > > > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET, vf_offset); > > > > > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_STRIDE, vf_stride); > > > > > @@ -180,6 +182,11 @@ static void register_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > > > > > assert(dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf); > > > > > > > > > > trace_sriov_register_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > > > > > + > > > > > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > > > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, num_vfs); > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i] = register_vf(dev, devfn, dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname, i); > > > > > if (!dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]) { > > > > > @@ -198,6 +205,11 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > > > > > uint16_t i; > > > > > > > > > > trace_sriov_unregister_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > > > > > + > > > > > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > > > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, 0); > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > > > > > PCIDevice *vf = dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]; > > > > > object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(vf), "realized", false, &local_err); > > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > > > index 0974f00054..9ab48b79c0 100644 > > > > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > > > @@ -13,11 +13,16 @@ > > > > > #ifndef QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > > > > > #define QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > > > > > > > > > > +typedef void (*SriovVfsUpdate)(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t prev_num_vfs, > > > > > + uint16_t num_vfs); > > > > > + > > > > > struct PCIESriovPF { > > > > > uint16_t num_vfs; /* Number of virtual functions created */ > > > > > uint8_t vf_bar_type[PCI_NUM_REGIONS]; /* Store type for each VF bar */ > > > > > const char *vfname; /* Reference to the device type used for the VFs */ > > > > > PCIDevice **vf; /* Pointer to an array of num_vfs VF devices */ > > > > > + > > > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update; /* Callback preceding VFs count change */ > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > struct PCIESriovVF { > > > > > @@ -28,7 +33,8 @@ struct PCIESriovVF { > > > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > > > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > > > > > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > > > > > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride); > > > > > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > > > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update); > > > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_exit(PCIDevice *dev); > > > > > > > > > > /* Set up a VF bar in the SR/IOV bar area */ > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > A custom config_write callback was the first approach we used. > > > However, once implemented, we realized it looks the same as the > > > pcie_sriov_config_write function. To avoid code duplication and > > > interfering with the internal SR-IOV structures for purposes of NVMe, > > > we opted for this callback prior to the VFs update. > > > After all, we have callbacks in both approaches, config_write and the > > > added pre_vfs_update, so both are prone to misuse. > > > > > > But I agree it may not be a good moment yet to add a new API > > > specifically for SR-IOV functionality, as NVMe will be the first device > > > to use it. > > > > > > CCing Knut, perhaps as the author of SR-IOV you have some thoughts on > > > how the device notification of an upcoming VFs update would be handled. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Lukasz > > > > So just split it up? > > > > void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > { > > uint32_t off; > > uint16_t sriov_cap = dev->exp.sriov_cap; > > > > if (!sriov_cap || address < sriov_cap) { > > return; > > } > > off = address - sriov_cap; > > if (off >= PCI_EXT_CAP_SRIOV_SIZEOF) { > > return; > > } > > > > trace_sriov_config_write(SRIOV_ID(dev), off, val, len); > > > > if (range_covers_byte(off, len, PCI_SRIOV_CTRL)) { > > if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs) { > > if (!(val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE)) { > > unregister_vfs(dev); > > } > > } else { > > if (val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) { > > register_vfs(dev); > > } > > } > > } > > } > > > > > > Would become: > > > > bool > > pcie_sriov_is_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > { > > uint32_t off; > > uint16_t sriov_cap = dev->exp.sriov_cap; > > > > if (!sriov_cap || address < sriov_cap) { > > return false; > > } > > off = address - sriov_cap; > > if (off >= PCI_EXT_CAP_SRIOV_SIZEOF) { > > return false; > > } > > } > > > > bool > > pcie_sriov_do_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > { > > trace_sriov_config_write(SRIOV_ID(dev), off, val, len); > > > > if (range_covers_byte(off, len, PCI_SRIOV_CTRL)) { > > if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs) { > > if (!(val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE)) { > > unregister_vfs(dev); > > } > > } else { > > if (val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) { > > register_vfs(dev); > > } > > } > > } > > } > > > > > > > > void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > { > > if (pcie_sriov_is_config_write(dev, address, val, len)) { > > pcie_sriov_do_config_write(dev, address, val, len); > > } > > > > } > > > > > > Now pcie_sriov_is_config_write and pcie_sriov_do_config_write > > can be reused by NVME. > > > > -- > > MST > > > > Hi Michael, > > I extracted one condition to the helper, what do you think? > > bool pcie_sriov_is_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > { > uint32_t off; > uint16_t sriov_cap = dev->exp.sriov_cap; > > if (!sriov_cap || address < sriov_cap) { > return false; > } > off = address - sriov_cap; > if (off >= PCI_EXT_CAP_SRIOV_SIZEOF) { > return false; > } > > if (range_covers_byte(off, len, PCI_SRIOV_CTRL)) { > return true; > } > > return false; > } > > static void pcie_sriov_do_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, > uint32_t val, int len) > { > uint32_t off = address - dev->exp.sriov_cap; > trace_sriov_config_write(SRIOV_ID(dev), off, val, len); > > if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs) { > if (!(val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE)) { > unregister_vfs(dev); > } > } else { > if (val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) { > register_vfs(dev); > } > } > } > > void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > { > if (pcie_sriov_is_config_write(dev, address, val, len)) { > pcie_sriov_do_config_write(dev, address, val, len); > } > } ok > -- > Lukasz
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 01:30:32PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 06:24:14PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 05:10:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 06:06:46PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:25:12AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 06:23:55PM +0200, Lukasz Maniak wrote: > > > > > > PCIe devices implementing SR-IOV may need to perform certain actions > > > > > > before the VFs are unrealized or vice versa. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Maniak <lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > > > > > Callbacks are annoying and easy to misuse though. > > > > > VFs are enabled through a config cycle, we generally just > > > > > have devices invoke the capability handler. > > > > > E.g. > > > > > > > > > > static void pci_bridge_dev_write_config(PCIDevice *d, > > > > > uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > > > > { > > > > > pci_bridge_write_config(d, address, val, len); > > > > > if (msi_present(d)) { > > > > > msi_write_config(d, address, val, len); > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > this makes it easy to do whatever you want before/after > > > > > the write. You can also add a helper to check > > > > > that SRIOV is being enabled/disabled if necessary. > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > docs/pcie_sriov.txt | 2 +- > > > > > > hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > > > > > > include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h | 8 +++++++- > > > > > > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > > > > index f5e891e1d4..63ca1a7b8e 100644 > > > > > > --- a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > > > > +++ b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt > > > > > > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ setting up a BAR for a VF. > > > > > > /* Add and initialize the SR/IOV capability */ > > > > > > pcie_sriov_pf_init(d, 0x200, "your_virtual_dev", > > > > > > vf_devid, initial_vfs, total_vfs, > > > > > > - fun_offset, stride); > > > > > > + fun_offset, stride, pre_vfs_update_cb); > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Set up individual VF BARs (parameters as for normal BARs) */ > > > > > > pcie_sriov_pf_init_vf_bar( ... ) > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > > > > index 501a1ff433..cac2aee061 100644 > > > > > > --- a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > > > > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c > > > > > > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev); > > > > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > > > > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > > > > > > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > > > > > > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride) > > > > > > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > > > > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update) > > > > > > { > > > > > > uint8_t *cfg = dev->config + offset; > > > > > > uint8_t *wmask; > > > > > > @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs = 0; > > > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname = g_strdup(vfname); > > > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf = NULL; > > > > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update = pre_vfs_update; > > > > > > > > > > > > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET, vf_offset); > > > > > > pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_STRIDE, vf_stride); > > > > > > @@ -180,6 +182,11 @@ static void register_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > > > > > > assert(dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf); > > > > > > > > > > > > trace_sriov_register_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > > > > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, num_vfs); > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > > > > > > dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i] = register_vf(dev, devfn, dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname, i); > > > > > > if (!dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]) { > > > > > > @@ -198,6 +205,11 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) > > > > > > uint16_t i; > > > > > > > > > > > > trace_sriov_unregister_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { > > > > > > + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, 0); > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { > > > > > > PCIDevice *vf = dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]; > > > > > > object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(vf), "realized", false, &local_err); > > > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > > > > index 0974f00054..9ab48b79c0 100644 > > > > > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > > > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h > > > > > > @@ -13,11 +13,16 @@ > > > > > > #ifndef QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > > > > > > #define QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H > > > > > > > > > > > > +typedef void (*SriovVfsUpdate)(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t prev_num_vfs, > > > > > > + uint16_t num_vfs); > > > > > > + > > > > > > struct PCIESriovPF { > > > > > > uint16_t num_vfs; /* Number of virtual functions created */ > > > > > > uint8_t vf_bar_type[PCI_NUM_REGIONS]; /* Store type for each VF bar */ > > > > > > const char *vfname; /* Reference to the device type used for the VFs */ > > > > > > PCIDevice **vf; /* Pointer to an array of num_vfs VF devices */ > > > > > > + > > > > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update; /* Callback preceding VFs count change */ > > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > > > struct PCIESriovVF { > > > > > > @@ -28,7 +33,8 @@ struct PCIESriovVF { > > > > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, > > > > > > const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, > > > > > > uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, > > > > > > - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride); > > > > > > + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, > > > > > > + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update); > > > > > > void pcie_sriov_pf_exit(PCIDevice *dev); > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Set up a VF bar in the SR/IOV bar area */ > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > > > A custom config_write callback was the first approach we used. > > > > However, once implemented, we realized it looks the same as the > > > > pcie_sriov_config_write function. To avoid code duplication and > > > > interfering with the internal SR-IOV structures for purposes of NVMe, > > > > we opted for this callback prior to the VFs update. > > > > After all, we have callbacks in both approaches, config_write and the > > > > added pre_vfs_update, so both are prone to misuse. > > > > > > > > But I agree it may not be a good moment yet to add a new API > > > > specifically for SR-IOV functionality, as NVMe will be the first device > > > > to use it. > > > > > > > > CCing Knut, perhaps as the author of SR-IOV you have some thoughts on > > > > how the device notification of an upcoming VFs update would be handled. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Lukasz > > > > > > So just split it up? > > > > > > void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > > { > > > uint32_t off; > > > uint16_t sriov_cap = dev->exp.sriov_cap; > > > > > > if (!sriov_cap || address < sriov_cap) { > > > return; > > > } > > > off = address - sriov_cap; > > > if (off >= PCI_EXT_CAP_SRIOV_SIZEOF) { > > > return; > > > } > > > > > > trace_sriov_config_write(SRIOV_ID(dev), off, val, len); > > > > > > if (range_covers_byte(off, len, PCI_SRIOV_CTRL)) { > > > if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs) { > > > if (!(val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE)) { > > > unregister_vfs(dev); > > > } > > > } else { > > > if (val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) { > > > register_vfs(dev); > > > } > > > } > > > } > > > } > > > > > > > > > Would become: > > > > > > bool > > > pcie_sriov_is_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > > { > > > uint32_t off; > > > uint16_t sriov_cap = dev->exp.sriov_cap; > > > > > > if (!sriov_cap || address < sriov_cap) { > > > return false; > > > } > > > off = address - sriov_cap; > > > if (off >= PCI_EXT_CAP_SRIOV_SIZEOF) { > > > return false; > > > } > > > } > > > > > > bool > > > pcie_sriov_do_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > > { > > > trace_sriov_config_write(SRIOV_ID(dev), off, val, len); > > > > > > if (range_covers_byte(off, len, PCI_SRIOV_CTRL)) { > > > if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs) { > > > if (!(val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE)) { > > > unregister_vfs(dev); > > > } > > > } else { > > > if (val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) { > > > register_vfs(dev); > > > } > > > } > > > } > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > > { > > > if (pcie_sriov_is_config_write(dev, address, val, len)) { > > > pcie_sriov_do_config_write(dev, address, val, len); > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > Now pcie_sriov_is_config_write and pcie_sriov_do_config_write > > > can be reused by NVME. > > > > > > -- > > > MST > > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > I extracted one condition to the helper, what do you think? > > > > bool pcie_sriov_is_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > { > > uint32_t off; > > uint16_t sriov_cap = dev->exp.sriov_cap; > > > > if (!sriov_cap || address < sriov_cap) { > > return false; > > } > > off = address - sriov_cap; > > if (off >= PCI_EXT_CAP_SRIOV_SIZEOF) { > > return false; > > } > > > > if (range_covers_byte(off, len, PCI_SRIOV_CTRL)) { > > return true; > > } > > > > return false; > > } > > > > static void pcie_sriov_do_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, > > uint32_t val, int len) > > { > > uint32_t off = address - dev->exp.sriov_cap; > > trace_sriov_config_write(SRIOV_ID(dev), off, val, len); > > > > if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs) { > > if (!(val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE)) { > > unregister_vfs(dev); > > } > > } else { > > if (val & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE) { > > register_vfs(dev); > > } > > } > > } > > > > void pcie_sriov_config_write(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t address, uint32_t val, int len) > > { > > if (pcie_sriov_is_config_write(dev, address, val, len)) { > > pcie_sriov_do_config_write(dev, address, val, len); > > } > > } > > ok > > > -- > > Lukasz > Hi Michael, After more investigation, we concluded that both pre_vfs_update callback and pcie_sriov_config_write split are not required to perform needed device-side actions prior to the SR-IOV state change. Hence, we decided to drop this patch for v2. Kind regards, Lukasz
diff --git a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt index f5e891e1d4..63ca1a7b8e 100644 --- a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt +++ b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ setting up a BAR for a VF. /* Add and initialize the SR/IOV capability */ pcie_sriov_pf_init(d, 0x200, "your_virtual_dev", vf_devid, initial_vfs, total_vfs, - fun_offset, stride); + fun_offset, stride, pre_vfs_update_cb); /* Set up individual VF BARs (parameters as for normal BARs) */ pcie_sriov_pf_init_vf_bar( ... ) diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c index 501a1ff433..cac2aee061 100644 --- a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev); void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride) + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update) { uint8_t *cfg = dev->config + offset; uint8_t *wmask; @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs = 0; dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname = g_strdup(vfname); dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf = NULL; + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update = pre_vfs_update; pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET, vf_offset); pci_set_word(cfg + PCI_SRIOV_VF_STRIDE, vf_stride); @@ -180,6 +182,11 @@ static void register_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) assert(dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf); trace_sriov_register_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); + + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, num_vfs); + } + for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i] = register_vf(dev, devfn, dev->exp.sriov_pf.vfname, i); if (!dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]) { @@ -198,6 +205,11 @@ static void unregister_vfs(PCIDevice *dev) uint16_t i; trace_sriov_unregister_vfs(SRIOV_ID(dev), num_vfs); + + if (dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update) { + dev->exp.sriov_pf.pre_vfs_update(dev, dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs, 0); + } + for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) { PCIDevice *vf = dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf[i]; object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(vf), "realized", false, &local_err); diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h index 0974f00054..9ab48b79c0 100644 --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h @@ -13,11 +13,16 @@ #ifndef QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H #define QEMU_PCIE_SRIOV_H +typedef void (*SriovVfsUpdate)(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t prev_num_vfs, + uint16_t num_vfs); + struct PCIESriovPF { uint16_t num_vfs; /* Number of virtual functions created */ uint8_t vf_bar_type[PCI_NUM_REGIONS]; /* Store type for each VF bar */ const char *vfname; /* Reference to the device type used for the VFs */ PCIDevice **vf; /* Pointer to an array of num_vfs VF devices */ + + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update; /* Callback preceding VFs count change */ }; struct PCIESriovVF { @@ -28,7 +33,8 @@ struct PCIESriovVF { void pcie_sriov_pf_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, const char *vfname, uint16_t vf_dev_id, uint16_t init_vfs, uint16_t total_vfs, - uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride); + uint16_t vf_offset, uint16_t vf_stride, + SriovVfsUpdate pre_vfs_update); void pcie_sriov_pf_exit(PCIDevice *dev); /* Set up a VF bar in the SR/IOV bar area */
PCIe devices implementing SR-IOV may need to perform certain actions before the VFs are unrealized or vice versa. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Maniak <lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com> --- docs/pcie_sriov.txt | 2 +- hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c | 14 +++++++++++++- include/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.h | 8 +++++++- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)