Message ID | 20201202152611.677753-4-stefanha@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | vhost-user: avoid g_return_val_if() in get/set_config() | expand |
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:27 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote: > Do not validate input with g_return_val_if(). This API is intended for > checking programming errors and is compiled out with -DG_DISABLE_CHECKS. > > Use an explicit if statement for input validation so it cannot > accidentally be compiled out. > > Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> > --- > contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c > b/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c > index 6020c6f33a..1d79c61200 100644 > --- a/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c > +++ b/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c > @@ -212,7 +212,11 @@ static int vi_get_config(VuDev *dev, uint8_t *config, > uint32_t len) > { > VuInput *vi = container_of(dev, VuInput, dev.parent); > > - g_return_val_if_fail(len <= sizeof(*vi->sel_config), -1); > + if (len > sizeof(*vi->sel_config)) { > + g_critical("%s: len %u is larger than %zu", > + __func__, len, sizeof(*vi->sel_config)); > + return -1; > g_critical() already has __FILE__ __LINE__ and G_STRFUNC. otherwise looks good: Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> > + } > > if (vi->sel_config) { > memcpy(config, vi->sel_config, len); > -- > 2.28.0 > >
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 07:51:49PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:27 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Do not validate input with g_return_val_if(). This API is intended for > > checking programming errors and is compiled out with -DG_DISABLE_CHECKS. > > > > Use an explicit if statement for input validation so it cannot > > accidentally be compiled out. > > > > Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> > > --- > > contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c | 6 +++++- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c > > b/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c > > index 6020c6f33a..1d79c61200 100644 > > --- a/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c > > +++ b/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c > > @@ -212,7 +212,11 @@ static int vi_get_config(VuDev *dev, uint8_t *config, > > uint32_t len) > > { > > VuInput *vi = container_of(dev, VuInput, dev.parent); > > > > - g_return_val_if_fail(len <= sizeof(*vi->sel_config), -1); > > + if (len > sizeof(*vi->sel_config)) { > > + g_critical("%s: len %u is larger than %zu", > > + __func__, len, sizeof(*vi->sel_config)); > > + return -1; > > > > g_critical() already has __FILE__ __LINE__ and G_STRFUNC. Will fix. Stefan
diff --git a/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c b/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c index 6020c6f33a..1d79c61200 100644 --- a/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c +++ b/contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c @@ -212,7 +212,11 @@ static int vi_get_config(VuDev *dev, uint8_t *config, uint32_t len) { VuInput *vi = container_of(dev, VuInput, dev.parent); - g_return_val_if_fail(len <= sizeof(*vi->sel_config), -1); + if (len > sizeof(*vi->sel_config)) { + g_critical("%s: len %u is larger than %zu", + __func__, len, sizeof(*vi->sel_config)); + return -1; + } if (vi->sel_config) { memcpy(config, vi->sel_config, len);
Do not validate input with g_return_val_if(). This API is intended for checking programming errors and is compiled out with -DG_DISABLE_CHECKS. Use an explicit if statement for input validation so it cannot accidentally be compiled out. Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> --- contrib/vhost-user-input/main.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)