diff mbox series

[v2,30/38] qapi/introspect.py: Add a typed 'extra' structure

Message ID 20200922210101.4081073-31-jsnow@redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series qapi: static typing conversion, pt1 | expand

Commit Message

John Snow Sept. 22, 2020, 9 p.m. UTC
Typing arbitrarily shaped dicts with mypy is difficult prior to Python
3.8; using explicit structures is nicer.

Since we always define an Extra type now, the return type of _make_tree
simplifies and always returns the tuple.

Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
---
 scripts/qapi/introspect.py | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Eduardo Habkost Sept. 23, 2020, 4:13 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 05:00:53PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> Typing arbitrarily shaped dicts with mypy is difficult prior to Python
> 3.8; using explicit structures is nicer.
> 
> Since we always define an Extra type now, the return type of _make_tree
> simplifies and always returns the tuple.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
> ---
>  scripts/qapi/introspect.py | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 

Here I'm confused by both the original code and the new code.

I will try to review as a refactoring of existing code, but I'll
have suggestions for follow ups:

> diff --git a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
> index b036fcf9ce..41ca8afc67 100644
> --- a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
> +++ b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>  See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
>  """
>  
> +from typing import (NamedTuple, Optional, Sequence)
> +
>  from .common import (
>      c_name,
>      gen_endif,
> @@ -21,16 +23,21 @@
>                       QAPISchemaType)
>  
>  
> -def _make_tree(obj, ifcond, features, extra=None):
> -    if extra is None:
> -        extra = {}
> -    if ifcond:
> -        extra['if'] = ifcond
> +class Extra(NamedTuple):
> +    """
> +    Extra contains data that isn't intended for output by introspection.
> +    """
> +    comment: Optional[str] = None
> +    ifcond: Sequence[str] = tuple()
> +
> +
> +def _make_tree(obj, ifcond, features,
> +               extra: Optional[Extra] = None):
> +    comment = extra.comment if extra else None
> +    extra = Extra(comment, ifcond)

Here we have one big difference: now `extra` is being recreated,
and all fields except `extra.comment` are being ignored.  On the
original version, all fields in `extra` were being kept.  This
makes the existence of the `extra` argument pointless.

If you are going through the trouble of changing the type of the
4rd argument to _make_tree(), this seems more obvious:

  diff --git a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
  index 41ca8afc672..c62af94c9ad 100644
  --- a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
  +++ b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
  @@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ class Extra(NamedTuple):
   
   
   def _make_tree(obj, ifcond, features,
  -               extra: Optional[Extra] = None):
  -    comment = extra.comment if extra else None
  +               comment: Optional[str] = None):
       extra = Extra(comment, ifcond)
       if features:
           obj['features'] = [(f.name, Extra(None, f.ifcond)) for f in features]
  @@ -170,16 +169,16 @@ const QLitObject %(c_name)s = %(c_string)s;
           return self._name(typ.name)
   
       def _gen_tree(self, name, mtype, obj, ifcond, features):
  -        extra = None
  +        comment = None
           if mtype not in ('command', 'event', 'builtin', 'array'):
               if not self._unmask:
                   # Output a comment to make it easy to map masked names
                   # back to the source when reading the generated output.
  -                extra = Extra(comment=f'"{self._name(name)}" = {name}')
  +                comment = f'"{self._name(name)}" = {name}'
               name = self._name(name)
           obj['name'] = name
           obj['meta-type'] = mtype
  -        self._trees.append(_make_tree(obj, ifcond, features, extra))
  +        self._trees.append(_make_tree(obj, ifcond, features, comment))
   
       def _gen_member(self, member):
           obj = {'name': member.name, 'type': self._use_type(member.type)}

I understand you're trying to just make minimal refactoring, and I
don't think this should block your cleanup series.  So:

Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>


>      if features:
> -        obj['features'] = [(f.name, {'if': f.ifcond}) for f in features]
> -    if extra:
> -        return (obj, extra)
> -    return obj
> +        obj['features'] = [(f.name, Extra(None, f.ifcond)) for f in features]
> +    return (obj, extra)
>  
>  
>  def _tree_to_qlit(obj, level=0, suppress_first_indent=False):
> @@ -40,8 +47,8 @@ def indent(level):
>  
>      if isinstance(obj, tuple):
>          ifobj, extra = obj
> -        ifcond = extra.get('if')
> -        comment = extra.get('comment')
> +        ifcond = extra.ifcond
> +        comment = extra.comment
>          ret = ''
>          if comment:
>              ret += indent(level) + '/* %s */\n' % comment
> @@ -168,7 +175,7 @@ def _gen_tree(self, name, mtype, obj, ifcond, features):
>              if not self._unmask:
>                  # Output a comment to make it easy to map masked names
>                  # back to the source when reading the generated output.
> -                extra = {'comment': '"%s" = %s' % (self._name(name), name)}
> +                extra = Extra(comment=f'"{self._name(name)}" = {name}')
>              name = self._name(name)
>          obj['name'] = name
>          obj['meta-type'] = mtype
> -- 
> 2.26.2
>
John Snow Sept. 23, 2020, 9:34 p.m. UTC | #2
On 9/23/20 12:13 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 05:00:53PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>> Typing arbitrarily shaped dicts with mypy is difficult prior to Python
>> 3.8; using explicit structures is nicer.
>>
>> Since we always define an Extra type now, the return type of _make_tree
>> simplifies and always returns the tuple.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   scripts/qapi/introspect.py | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> Here I'm confused by both the original code and the new code.
> 
> I will try to review as a refactoring of existing code, but I'll
> have suggestions for follow ups:
> 
>> diff --git a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
>> index b036fcf9ce..41ca8afc67 100644
>> --- a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
>> +++ b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>>   See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
>>   """
>>   
>> +from typing import (NamedTuple, Optional, Sequence)
>> +
>>   from .common import (
>>       c_name,
>>       gen_endif,
>> @@ -21,16 +23,21 @@
>>                        QAPISchemaType)
>>   
>>   
>> -def _make_tree(obj, ifcond, features, extra=None):
>> -    if extra is None:
>> -        extra = {}
>> -    if ifcond:
>> -        extra['if'] = ifcond
>> +class Extra(NamedTuple):
>> +    """
>> +    Extra contains data that isn't intended for output by introspection.
>> +    """
>> +    comment: Optional[str] = None
>> +    ifcond: Sequence[str] = tuple()
>> +
>> +
>> +def _make_tree(obj, ifcond, features,
>> +               extra: Optional[Extra] = None):
>> +    comment = extra.comment if extra else None
>> +    extra = Extra(comment, ifcond)
> 
> Here we have one big difference: now `extra` is being recreated,
> and all fields except `extra.comment` are being ignored.  On the
> original version, all fields in `extra` were being kept.  This
> makes the existence of the `extra` argument pointless.
> 

Yup, oops.

> If you are going through the trouble of changing the type of the
> 4rd argument to _make_tree(), this seems more obvious:
> 

Yes, agree. I came up with something similar after talking to you this 
morning.

>    diff --git a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
>    index 41ca8afc672..c62af94c9ad 100644
>    --- a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
>    +++ b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
>    @@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ class Extra(NamedTuple):
>     
>     
>     def _make_tree(obj, ifcond, features,
>    -               extra: Optional[Extra] = None):
>    -    comment = extra.comment if extra else None
>    +               comment: Optional[str] = None):
>         extra = Extra(comment, ifcond)
>         if features:
>             obj['features'] = [(f.name, Extra(None, f.ifcond)) for f in features]
>    @@ -170,16 +169,16 @@ const QLitObject %(c_name)s = %(c_string)s;
>             return self._name(typ.name)
>     
>         def _gen_tree(self, name, mtype, obj, ifcond, features):
>    -        extra = None
>    +        comment = None
>             if mtype not in ('command', 'event', 'builtin', 'array'):
>                 if not self._unmask:
>                     # Output a comment to make it easy to map masked names
>                     # back to the source when reading the generated output.
>    -                extra = Extra(comment=f'"{self._name(name)}" = {name}')
>    +                comment = f'"{self._name(name)}" = {name}'
>                 name = self._name(name)
>             obj['name'] = name
>             obj['meta-type'] = mtype
>    -        self._trees.append(_make_tree(obj, ifcond, features, extra))
>    +        self._trees.append(_make_tree(obj, ifcond, features, comment))
>     
>         def _gen_member(self, member):
>             obj = {'name': member.name, 'type': self._use_type(member.type)}
> 
> I understand you're trying to just make minimal refactoring, and I
> don't think this should block your cleanup series.  So:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>

I appreciate the benefit-of-the-doubt, but I think this change is worth 
making while we're here.

> 
>>       if features:
>> -        obj['features'] = [(f.name, {'if': f.ifcond}) for f in features]
>> -    if extra:
>> -        return (obj, extra)
>> -    return obj
>> +        obj['features'] = [(f.name, Extra(None, f.ifcond)) for f in features]
>> +    return (obj, extra)
>>   
>>   
>>   def _tree_to_qlit(obj, level=0, suppress_first_indent=False):
>> @@ -40,8 +47,8 @@ def indent(level):
>>   
>>       if isinstance(obj, tuple):
>>           ifobj, extra = obj
>> -        ifcond = extra.get('if')
>> -        comment = extra.get('comment')
>> +        ifcond = extra.ifcond
>> +        comment = extra.comment
>>           ret = ''
>>           if comment:
>>               ret += indent(level) + '/* %s */\n' % comment
>> @@ -168,7 +175,7 @@ def _gen_tree(self, name, mtype, obj, ifcond, features):
>>               if not self._unmask:
>>                   # Output a comment to make it easy to map masked names
>>                   # back to the source when reading the generated output.
>> -                extra = {'comment': '"%s" = %s' % (self._name(name), name)}
>> +                extra = Extra(comment=f'"{self._name(name)}" = {name}')
>>               name = self._name(name)
>>           obj['name'] = name
>>           obj['meta-type'] = mtype
>> -- 
>> 2.26.2
>>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
index b036fcf9ce..41ca8afc67 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ 
 See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
 """
 
+from typing import (NamedTuple, Optional, Sequence)
+
 from .common import (
     c_name,
     gen_endif,
@@ -21,16 +23,21 @@ 
                      QAPISchemaType)
 
 
-def _make_tree(obj, ifcond, features, extra=None):
-    if extra is None:
-        extra = {}
-    if ifcond:
-        extra['if'] = ifcond
+class Extra(NamedTuple):
+    """
+    Extra contains data that isn't intended for output by introspection.
+    """
+    comment: Optional[str] = None
+    ifcond: Sequence[str] = tuple()
+
+
+def _make_tree(obj, ifcond, features,
+               extra: Optional[Extra] = None):
+    comment = extra.comment if extra else None
+    extra = Extra(comment, ifcond)
     if features:
-        obj['features'] = [(f.name, {'if': f.ifcond}) for f in features]
-    if extra:
-        return (obj, extra)
-    return obj
+        obj['features'] = [(f.name, Extra(None, f.ifcond)) for f in features]
+    return (obj, extra)
 
 
 def _tree_to_qlit(obj, level=0, suppress_first_indent=False):
@@ -40,8 +47,8 @@  def indent(level):
 
     if isinstance(obj, tuple):
         ifobj, extra = obj
-        ifcond = extra.get('if')
-        comment = extra.get('comment')
+        ifcond = extra.ifcond
+        comment = extra.comment
         ret = ''
         if comment:
             ret += indent(level) + '/* %s */\n' % comment
@@ -168,7 +175,7 @@  def _gen_tree(self, name, mtype, obj, ifcond, features):
             if not self._unmask:
                 # Output a comment to make it easy to map masked names
                 # back to the source when reading the generated output.
-                extra = {'comment': '"%s" = %s' % (self._name(name), name)}
+                extra = Extra(comment=f'"{self._name(name)}" = {name}')
             name = self._name(name)
         obj['name'] = name
         obj['meta-type'] = mtype