From patchwork Tue Aug 4 17:00:45 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Huth X-Patchwork-Id: 1340929 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FDaEyUVH; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BLgzS6rsKz9sRR for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 03:02:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33212 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k30KY-00071X-EK for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:02:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k30Jh-00070I-5F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:01:34 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:42715 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k30JY-0005S4-AH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:01:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596560483; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=99FBdWlOZStsb8mEmnNVHwzfy+s7AX3U3Is+8PrfDJY=; b=FDaEyUVHrIqmCySD2paFwOduCClM6RHa4NhRo+Hn6rTI8ZVJbStPAdEv/ZPBYnOO5ImVOj OUan9dMRocLk1fKAsQEeu4WV6KeYz4XW/1c85427kL+9J+p5oEw2cPAcsh414GX/G0X6Lc S6XHxgYaNsvwqbM8Tse1L+XOM+7rFRM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-76-EnC3WtICN9WlVGSSadFs8Q-1; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:01:15 -0400 X-MC-Unique: EnC3WtICN9WlVGSSadFs8Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4135100AA21; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth.com (ovpn-112-162.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.162]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46EA10013D0; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:01:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Huth To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , =?utf-8?q?Alex?= =?utf-8?q?_Benn=C3=A9e?= Subject: [PATCH 01/11] virtio-mem: Correct format specifier mismatch for RISC-V Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 19:00:45 +0200 Message-Id: <20200804170055.2851-2-thuth@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200804170055.2851-1-thuth@redhat.com> References: <20200804170055.2851-1-thuth@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=thuth@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.61; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/04 01:28:16 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -40 X-Spam_score: -4.1 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Stefan Weil , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Bruce Rogers This likely affects other, less popular host architectures as well. Less common host architectures under linux get QEMU_VMALLOC_ALIGN (from which VIRTIO_MEM_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE is derived) define to a variable of type uintptr, which isn't compatible with the format specifier used to print a user message. Since this particular usage of the underlying data seems unique to this file, the simple fix is to just cast QEMU_VMALLOC_ALIGN to uint32_t, which corresponds to the format specifier used. Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers Message-Id: <20200730130519.168475-1-brogers@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c index c12e9f79b0..7740fc613f 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ * Use QEMU_VMALLOC_ALIGN, so no THP will have to be split when unplugging * memory (e.g., 2MB on x86_64). */ -#define VIRTIO_MEM_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE QEMU_VMALLOC_ALIGN +#define VIRTIO_MEM_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE ((uint32_t)QEMU_VMALLOC_ALIGN) /* * Size the usable region bigger than the requested size if possible. Esp. * Linux guests will only add (aligned) memory blocks in case they fully