diff mbox series

[PULL,29/31] block/vhdx: drop unallocated_blocks_are_zero

Message ID 20200706100432.2301919-30-mreitz@redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series [PULL,01/31] block/block-copy: block_copy_dirty_clusters: fix failure check | expand

Commit Message

Max Reitz July 6, 2020, 10:04 a.m. UTC 
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

vhdx doesn't have .bdrv_co_block_status handler, so DATA|ALLOCATED is
always assumed for it in bdrv_co_block_status().
unallocated_blocks_are_zero is useless (it doesn't affect the only user
of the field: bdrv_co_block_status()), drop it.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200528094405.145708-9-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
---
 block/vhdx.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/block/vhdx.c b/block/vhdx.c
index fa9e544a5e..645dc4b4f4 100644
--- a/block/vhdx.c
+++ b/block/vhdx.c
@@ -1164,9 +1164,6 @@  static int vhdx_get_info(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverInfo *bdi)
 
     bdi->cluster_size = s->block_size;
 
-    bdi->unallocated_blocks_are_zero =
-        (s->params.data_bits & VHDX_PARAMS_HAS_PARENT) == 0;
-
     return 0;
 }