From patchwork Mon May 11 14:11:03 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Igor Mammedov X-Patchwork-Id: 1287827 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=GGgHS3Kt; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49LNMB4Ktmz9sRf for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 00:18:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42570 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jY9Fz-0000fZ-Nd for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 10:18:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jY99H-0000GM-2Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 10:11:15 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:47985 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jY99G-0003m9-8C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 10:11:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1589206273; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=kX9jF7eoGAEHyIV6/c7y0ZOPuncIrUjOHAqyeUtGQzg=; b=GGgHS3Kt0AIK/5DbWPzORQ/YD4s6TCH4qu2Tg4A+T5/1nsVjVkddx4eFodJThfCssZgl6R G8M/SX8coZmgpaHEp3FplOZzJ5Rl6x9HsJZwoUGlFy3N8RBKLGhpQ5Jg3OsEMEHRXFKTWD Tn+xiOY9IaDzqcF2L+gWAkExufLo3AU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-460-OZKtK-JhPj2O7Gc86mdgnA-1; Mon, 11 May 2020 10:11:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OZKtK-JhPj2O7Gc86mdgnA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E68872FE2 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 14:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dell-r430-03.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com (dell-r430-03.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com [10.37.153.18]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7FF5C1B2; Mon, 11 May 2020 14:11:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Igor Mammedov To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH 2/2] numa: prevent usage of -M memory-backend and -numa memdev at the same time Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 10:11:03 -0400 Message-Id: <20200511141103.43768-3-imammedo@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200511141103.43768-1-imammedo@redhat.com> References: <20200511141103.43768-1-imammedo@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.120; envelope-from=imammedo@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/11 00:05:06 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Options -M memory-backend and -numa memdev are mutually exclusive, and if used together, it might lead to a crash in the worst case. For example when the same backend is used with these options together: -m 4G \ -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=4G \ -M pc,memory-backend=mem0 \ -numa node,memdev=mem0 QEMU will abort with: exec.c:2006: qemu_ram_set_idstr: Assertion `!new_block->idstr[0]' failed. and following backtrace: abort () qemu_ram_set_idstr () vmstate_register_ram () vmstate_register_ram_global () machine_consume_memdev () numa_init_memdev_container () numa_complete_configuration () machine_run_board_init () add a check to error out in case the user tries to use both options at the same time. Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov --- hw/core/numa.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/core/numa.c b/hw/core/numa.c index 316bc50d75..5f81900f88 100644 --- a/hw/core/numa.c +++ b/hw/core/numa.c @@ -757,6 +757,11 @@ void numa_complete_configuration(MachineState *ms) } if (!numa_uses_legacy_mem() && mc->default_ram_id) { + if (ms->ram_memdev_id) { + error_report("'-machine memory-backend' and '-numa memdev'" + " properties are mutually exclusive"); + exit(1); + } ms->ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); memory_region_init(ms->ram, OBJECT(ms), mc->default_ram_id, ram_size);