Message ID | 20200423164236.5181-1-steplong@quicinc.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [RFC] target/arm: Implement SVE2 TBL, TBX | expand |
On 4/23/20 9:42 AM, Stephen Long wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stephen Long <steplong@quicinc.com> > > These insns don't show up under any SVE2 categories in the manual. But > if you lookup each insn, you'll find they have SVE2 variants. > --- > target/arm/helper-sve.h | 10 +++++++ > target/arm/sve.decode | 5 ++++ > target/arm/sve_helper.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > target/arm/translate-sve.c | 20 ++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/target/arm/helper-sve.h b/target/arm/helper-sve.h > index f6ae814021..54d20575e8 100644 > --- a/target/arm/helper-sve.h > +++ b/target/arm/helper-sve.h > @@ -2687,3 +2687,13 @@ DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_sqrdcmlah_zzzz_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, > void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_sqrdcmlah_zzzz_d, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, > void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > + > +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_b, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_h, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_d, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > + > +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_b, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_h, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_d, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > diff --git a/target/arm/sve.decode b/target/arm/sve.decode > index 3a2a4a7f1c..483fbf0dcc 100644 > --- a/target/arm/sve.decode > +++ b/target/arm/sve.decode > @@ -1387,3 +1387,8 @@ UMLSLT_zzzw 01000100 .. 0 ..... 010 111 ..... ..... @rda_rn_rm > > CMLA_zzzz 01000100 esz:2 0 rm:5 0010 rot:2 rn:5 rd:5 ra=%reg_movprfx > SQRDCMLAH_zzzz 01000100 esz:2 0 rm:5 0011 rot:2 rn:5 rd:5 ra=%reg_movprfx > + > +### SVE2 Table Lookup (three sources) > + > +TBL_zzz 00000101 .. 1 ..... 00101 0 ..... ..... @rd_rn_rm > +TBX_zzz 00000101 .. 1 ..... 00101 1 ..... ..... @rd_rn_rm > diff --git a/target/arm/sve_helper.c b/target/arm/sve_helper.c > index 55e2c32f03..d1e91da02a 100644 > --- a/target/arm/sve_helper.c > +++ b/target/arm/sve_helper.c > @@ -2968,6 +2968,59 @@ DO_TBL(sve_tbl_d, uint64_t, ) > > #undef TBL > > +#define DO_SVE2_TBL(NAME, TYPE, H) \ > +void HELPER(NAME)(void *vd, void *vn1, void *vm, void *vn2, uint32_t desc) \ > +{ \ > + intptr_t i, opr_sz = simd_oprsz(desc); \ > + uintptr_t elem = opr_sz / sizeof(TYPE); \ > + TYPE *d = vd, *n1 = vn1, *n2 = vn2, *m = vm; \ > + ARMVectorReg tmp1, tmp2; \ Only one temp needed. > + if (unlikely(vd == vn1)) { \ > + n1 = memcpy(&tmp1, vn1, opr_sz); \ > + } \ > + if (unlikely(vd == vn2)) { \ > + n2 = memcpy(&tmp2, vn2, opr_sz); \ > + } Better with else if here. Because vd cannot overlap both vn1 or vn2, only one of them. \ > + for (i = 0; i < elem; i++) { \ > + TYPE j = m[H(i)]; \ > + d[H(i)] = j < (elem * 2) ? n1[H(j)] : 0; \ > + \ > + TYPE k = m[H(elem + i)]; \ > + d[H(elem + i)] = k < (elem * 2) ? n2[H(k)] : 0; \ > + } First, the indexing is wrong. Note that you're range checking vs elem * 2, but only indexing a single vector. Thus you must be indexing into the next vector. This should look more like TYPE j = m[H(i)]; TYPE r = 0; if (j < elem) { r = n1[H(j)]; } else if (j < 2 * elem) { r = n2[H(j - elem)]; } d[H(i)] = r; Second, this is one case where I'd prefer to share code with AArch64. It would be worthwhile to rearrange both sve1 and advsimd to use a common set of helpers. > +static bool trans_TBL_zzz(DisasContext *s, arg_rrr_esz *a) _zzz is not helpful here. The SVE1 insn also operates on 3 registers, and thus could logically be _zzz too. Better might be _double, after double_table = TRUE, or maybe just _2 just in case SVE3 adds a variant with more table registers. r~
Oh, maybe I misread the manual description for SVE2 TBL, but I thought Zm was the indexes register and the loop compares the index from Zm with the total number of elems, table_elems. -----Original Message----- From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 2:37 PM To: Stephen Long <steplong@quicinc.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Ana Pazos <apazos@quicinc.com> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH RFC] target/arm: Implement SVE2 TBL, TBX On 4/23/20 9:42 AM, Stephen Long wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stephen Long <steplong@quicinc.com> > > These insns don't show up under any SVE2 categories in the manual. But > if you lookup each insn, you'll find they have SVE2 variants. > --- > target/arm/helper-sve.h | 10 +++++++ > target/arm/sve.decode | 5 ++++ > target/arm/sve_helper.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > target/arm/translate-sve.c | 20 ++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/target/arm/helper-sve.h b/target/arm/helper-sve.h index > f6ae814021..54d20575e8 100644 > --- a/target/arm/helper-sve.h > +++ b/target/arm/helper-sve.h > @@ -2687,3 +2687,13 @@ DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_sqrdcmlah_zzzz_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, > void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_sqrdcmlah_zzzz_d, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, > void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > + > +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_b, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, > +ptr, i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_h, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, > +ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, > +void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_d, > +TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > + > +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_b, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, > +i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_h, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, > +ptr, i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, > +ptr, ptr, i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_d, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, > +ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) > diff --git a/target/arm/sve.decode b/target/arm/sve.decode index > 3a2a4a7f1c..483fbf0dcc 100644 > --- a/target/arm/sve.decode > +++ b/target/arm/sve.decode > @@ -1387,3 +1387,8 @@ UMLSLT_zzzw 01000100 .. 0 ..... 010 111 ..... ..... @rda_rn_rm > > CMLA_zzzz 01000100 esz:2 0 rm:5 0010 rot:2 rn:5 rd:5 ra=%reg_movprfx > SQRDCMLAH_zzzz 01000100 esz:2 0 rm:5 0011 rot:2 rn:5 rd:5 > ra=%reg_movprfx > + > +### SVE2 Table Lookup (three sources) > + > +TBL_zzz 00000101 .. 1 ..... 00101 0 ..... ..... @rd_rn_rm > +TBX_zzz 00000101 .. 1 ..... 00101 1 ..... ..... @rd_rn_rm > diff --git a/target/arm/sve_helper.c b/target/arm/sve_helper.c index > 55e2c32f03..d1e91da02a 100644 > --- a/target/arm/sve_helper.c > +++ b/target/arm/sve_helper.c > @@ -2968,6 +2968,59 @@ DO_TBL(sve_tbl_d, uint64_t, ) > > #undef TBL > > +#define DO_SVE2_TBL(NAME, TYPE, H) \ > +void HELPER(NAME)(void *vd, void *vn1, void *vm, void *vn2, uint32_t desc) \ > +{ \ > + intptr_t i, opr_sz = simd_oprsz(desc); \ > + uintptr_t elem = opr_sz / sizeof(TYPE); \ > + TYPE *d = vd, *n1 = vn1, *n2 = vn2, *m = vm; \ > + ARMVectorReg tmp1, tmp2; \ Only one temp needed. > + if (unlikely(vd == vn1)) { \ > + n1 = memcpy(&tmp1, vn1, opr_sz); \ > + } \ > + if (unlikely(vd == vn2)) { \ > + n2 = memcpy(&tmp2, vn2, opr_sz); \ > + } Better with else if here. Because vd cannot overlap both vn1 or vn2, only one of them. \ > + for (i = 0; i < elem; i++) { \ > + TYPE j = m[H(i)]; \ > + d[H(i)] = j < (elem * 2) ? n1[H(j)] : 0; \ > + \ > + TYPE k = m[H(elem + i)]; \ > + d[H(elem + i)] = k < (elem * 2) ? n2[H(k)] : 0; \ > + } First, the indexing is wrong. Note that you're range checking vs elem * 2, but only indexing a single vector. Thus you must be indexing into the next vector. This should look more like TYPE j = m[H(i)]; TYPE r = 0; if (j < elem) { r = n1[H(j)]; } else if (j < 2 * elem) { r = n2[H(j - elem)]; } d[H(i)] = r; Second, this is one case where I'd prefer to share code with AArch64. It would be worthwhile to rearrange both sve1 and advsimd to use a common set of helpers. > +static bool trans_TBL_zzz(DisasContext *s, arg_rrr_esz *a) _zzz is not helpful here. The SVE1 insn also operates on 3 registers, and thus could logically be _zzz too. Better might be _double, after double_table = TRUE, or maybe just _2 just in case SVE3 adds a variant with more table registers. r~
On 4/24/20 3:47 PM, Stephen Long wrote: > Oh, maybe I misread the manual description for SVE2 TBL, but I thought Zm was the indexes register and the loop compares the index from Zm with the total number of elems, table_elems. That's right. You take the index from Zm just fine, but fail to apply that index properly across Zn and Zn+1. r~ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 2:37 PM > To: Stephen Long <steplong@quicinc.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Ana Pazos <apazos@quicinc.com> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH RFC] target/arm: Implement SVE2 TBL, TBX > > On 4/23/20 9:42 AM, Stephen Long wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Long <steplong@quicinc.com> >> >> These insns don't show up under any SVE2 categories in the manual. But >> if you lookup each insn, you'll find they have SVE2 variants. >> --- >> target/arm/helper-sve.h | 10 +++++++ >> target/arm/sve.decode | 5 ++++ >> target/arm/sve_helper.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> target/arm/translate-sve.c | 20 ++++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/target/arm/helper-sve.h b/target/arm/helper-sve.h index >> f6ae814021..54d20575e8 100644 >> --- a/target/arm/helper-sve.h >> +++ b/target/arm/helper-sve.h >> @@ -2687,3 +2687,13 @@ DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_sqrdcmlah_zzzz_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, >> void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) >> DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_sqrdcmlah_zzzz_d, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, >> void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) >> + >> +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_b, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, >> +ptr, i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_h, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, >> +ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, >> +void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_d, >> +TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) >> + >> +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_b, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, >> +i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_h, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, >> +ptr, i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, >> +ptr, ptr, i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_d, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, >> +ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) >> diff --git a/target/arm/sve.decode b/target/arm/sve.decode index >> 3a2a4a7f1c..483fbf0dcc 100644 >> --- a/target/arm/sve.decode >> +++ b/target/arm/sve.decode >> @@ -1387,3 +1387,8 @@ UMLSLT_zzzw 01000100 .. 0 ..... 010 111 ..... ..... @rda_rn_rm >> >> CMLA_zzzz 01000100 esz:2 0 rm:5 0010 rot:2 rn:5 rd:5 ra=%reg_movprfx >> SQRDCMLAH_zzzz 01000100 esz:2 0 rm:5 0011 rot:2 rn:5 rd:5 >> ra=%reg_movprfx >> + >> +### SVE2 Table Lookup (three sources) >> + >> +TBL_zzz 00000101 .. 1 ..... 00101 0 ..... ..... @rd_rn_rm >> +TBX_zzz 00000101 .. 1 ..... 00101 1 ..... ..... @rd_rn_rm >> diff --git a/target/arm/sve_helper.c b/target/arm/sve_helper.c index >> 55e2c32f03..d1e91da02a 100644 >> --- a/target/arm/sve_helper.c >> +++ b/target/arm/sve_helper.c >> @@ -2968,6 +2968,59 @@ DO_TBL(sve_tbl_d, uint64_t, ) >> >> #undef TBL >> >> +#define DO_SVE2_TBL(NAME, TYPE, H) \ >> +void HELPER(NAME)(void *vd, void *vn1, void *vm, void *vn2, uint32_t desc) \ >> +{ \ >> + intptr_t i, opr_sz = simd_oprsz(desc); \ >> + uintptr_t elem = opr_sz / sizeof(TYPE); \ >> + TYPE *d = vd, *n1 = vn1, *n2 = vn2, *m = vm; \ >> + ARMVectorReg tmp1, tmp2; \ > > Only one temp needed. > >> + if (unlikely(vd == vn1)) { \ >> + n1 = memcpy(&tmp1, vn1, opr_sz); \ >> + } \ >> + if (unlikely(vd == vn2)) { \ >> + n2 = memcpy(&tmp2, vn2, opr_sz); \ >> + } > > Better with else if here. > Because vd cannot overlap both vn1 or vn2, only one of them. > \ >> + for (i = 0; i < elem; i++) { \ >> + TYPE j = m[H(i)]; \ >> + d[H(i)] = j < (elem * 2) ? n1[H(j)] : 0; \ >> + \ >> + TYPE k = m[H(elem + i)]; \ >> + d[H(elem + i)] = k < (elem * 2) ? n2[H(k)] : 0; \ >> + } > > First, the indexing is wrong. > > Note that you're range checking vs elem * 2, but only indexing a single vector. > Thus you must be indexing into the next vector. > > This should look more like > > TYPE j = m[H(i)]; > TYPE r = 0; > > if (j < elem) { > r = n1[H(j)]; > } else if (j < 2 * elem) { > r = n2[H(j - elem)]; > } > d[H(i)] = r; > > Second, this is one case where I'd prefer to share code with AArch64. It would be worthwhile to rearrange both sve1 and advsimd to use a common set of helpers. > >> +static bool trans_TBL_zzz(DisasContext *s, arg_rrr_esz *a) > > _zzz is not helpful here. The SVE1 insn also operates on 3 registers, and thus could logically be _zzz too. > > Better might be _double, after double_table = TRUE, or maybe just _2 just in case SVE3 adds a variant with more table registers. > > > r~ >
diff --git a/target/arm/helper-sve.h b/target/arm/helper-sve.h index f6ae814021..54d20575e8 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper-sve.h +++ b/target/arm/helper-sve.h @@ -2687,3 +2687,13 @@ DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_sqrdcmlah_zzzz_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_sqrdcmlah_zzzz_d, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) + +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_b, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_h, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(sve2_tbl_d, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) + +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_b, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_h, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_s, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(sve2_tbx_d, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG, void, ptr, ptr, ptr, i32) diff --git a/target/arm/sve.decode b/target/arm/sve.decode index 3a2a4a7f1c..483fbf0dcc 100644 --- a/target/arm/sve.decode +++ b/target/arm/sve.decode @@ -1387,3 +1387,8 @@ UMLSLT_zzzw 01000100 .. 0 ..... 010 111 ..... ..... @rda_rn_rm CMLA_zzzz 01000100 esz:2 0 rm:5 0010 rot:2 rn:5 rd:5 ra=%reg_movprfx SQRDCMLAH_zzzz 01000100 esz:2 0 rm:5 0011 rot:2 rn:5 rd:5 ra=%reg_movprfx + +### SVE2 Table Lookup (three sources) + +TBL_zzz 00000101 .. 1 ..... 00101 0 ..... ..... @rd_rn_rm +TBX_zzz 00000101 .. 1 ..... 00101 1 ..... ..... @rd_rn_rm diff --git a/target/arm/sve_helper.c b/target/arm/sve_helper.c index 55e2c32f03..d1e91da02a 100644 --- a/target/arm/sve_helper.c +++ b/target/arm/sve_helper.c @@ -2968,6 +2968,59 @@ DO_TBL(sve_tbl_d, uint64_t, ) #undef TBL +#define DO_SVE2_TBL(NAME, TYPE, H) \ +void HELPER(NAME)(void *vd, void *vn1, void *vm, void *vn2, uint32_t desc) \ +{ \ + intptr_t i, opr_sz = simd_oprsz(desc); \ + uintptr_t elem = opr_sz / sizeof(TYPE); \ + TYPE *d = vd, *n1 = vn1, *n2 = vn2, *m = vm; \ + ARMVectorReg tmp1, tmp2; \ + if (unlikely(vd == vn1)) { \ + n1 = memcpy(&tmp1, vn1, opr_sz); \ + } \ + if (unlikely(vd == vn2)) { \ + n2 = memcpy(&tmp2, vn2, opr_sz); \ + } \ + for (i = 0; i < elem; i++) { \ + TYPE j = m[H(i)]; \ + d[H(i)] = j < (elem * 2) ? n1[H(j)] : 0; \ + \ + TYPE k = m[H(elem + i)]; \ + d[H(elem + i)] = k < (elem * 2) ? n2[H(k)] : 0; \ + } \ +} + +DO_SVE2_TBL(sve2_tbl_b, uint8_t, H1) +DO_SVE2_TBL(sve2_tbl_h, uint16_t, H2) +DO_SVE2_TBL(sve2_tbl_s, uint32_t, H4) +DO_SVE2_TBL(sve2_tbl_d, uint64_t, ) + +#define DO_SVE2_TBX(NAME, TYPE, H) \ +void HELPER(NAME)(void *vd, void *vn, void *vm, uint32_t desc) \ +{ \ + intptr_t i, opr_sz = simd_oprsz(desc); \ + uintptr_t elem = opr_sz / sizeof(TYPE); \ + TYPE *d = vd, *n = vn, *m = vm; \ + ARMVectorReg tmp; \ + if (unlikely(vd == vn)) { \ + n = memcpy(&tmp, vn, opr_sz); \ + } \ + for (i = 0; i < elem; i++) { \ + TYPE j = m[H(i)]; \ + if (j < elem) { \ + d[H(i)] = n[H(j)]; \ + } \ + } \ +} + +DO_SVE2_TBX(sve2_tbx_b, uint8_t, H1) +DO_SVE2_TBX(sve2_tbx_h, uint16_t, H2) +DO_SVE2_TBX(sve2_tbx_s, uint32_t, H4) +DO_SVE2_TBX(sve2_tbx_d, uint64_t, ) + +#undef DO_SVE2_TBX +#undef DO_SVE2_TBL + #define DO_UNPK(NAME, TYPED, TYPES, HD, HS) \ void HELPER(NAME)(void *vd, void *vn, uint32_t desc) \ { \ diff --git a/target/arm/translate-sve.c b/target/arm/translate-sve.c index 20eb588cb3..c2694d92dd 100644 --- a/target/arm/translate-sve.c +++ b/target/arm/translate-sve.c @@ -7882,3 +7882,23 @@ static bool trans_SQRDCMLAH_zzzz(DisasContext *s, arg_CMLA_zzzz *a) }; return do_sve2_zzzz_fn(s, a->rd, a->rn, a->rm, a->ra, fns[a->esz], a->rot); } + +static bool trans_TBL_zzz(DisasContext *s, arg_rrr_esz *a) +{ + static gen_helper_gvec_4 * const fns[] = { + gen_helper_sve2_tbl_b, gen_helper_sve2_tbl_h, + gen_helper_sve2_tbl_s, gen_helper_sve2_tbl_d, + }; + int rn1 = a->rn; + int rn2 = (a->rn + 1) % 32; + return do_sve2_zzzz_fn(s, a->rd, rn1, a->rm, rn2, fns[a->esz], 0); +} + +static bool trans_TBX_zzz(DisasContext *s, arg_rrr_esz *a) +{ + static gen_helper_gvec_3 * const fns[] = { + gen_helper_sve2_tbx_b, gen_helper_sve2_tbx_h, + gen_helper_sve2_tbx_s, gen_helper_sve2_tbx_d, + }; + return do_sve2_zzz_ool(s, a, fns[a->esz]); +}
Signed-off-by: Stephen Long <steplong@quicinc.com> These insns don't show up under any SVE2 categories in the manual. But if you lookup each insn, you'll find they have SVE2 variants. --- target/arm/helper-sve.h | 10 +++++++ target/arm/sve.decode | 5 ++++ target/arm/sve_helper.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ target/arm/translate-sve.c | 20 ++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+)