From patchwork Wed May 22 17:03:50 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Max Reitz X-Patchwork-Id: 1103476 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 458Jyc00lYz9s3l for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:09:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47997 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTUk1-0006tH-Uj for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Wed, 22 May 2019 13:09:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTUfI-0003en-N2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2019 13:04:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTUfG-0007sh-LP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2019 13:04:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTUfA-0007kr-FN; Wed, 22 May 2019 13:04:26 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9CD308FC4A; Wed, 22 May 2019 17:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-204-123.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.123]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCAD219C4F; Wed, 22 May 2019 17:04:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Max Reitz To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 19:03:50 +0200 Message-Id: <20190522170352.12020-7-mreitz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190522170352.12020-1-mreitz@redhat.com> References: <20190522170352.12020-1-mreitz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.43]); Wed, 22 May 2019 17:04:18 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/8] block: Add *tighten_restrictions to *check*_perm() X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" This patch makes three functions report whether the necessary permission change tightens restrictions or not. These functions are: - bdrv_check_perm() - bdrv_check_update_perm() - bdrv_child_check_perm() Callers can use this result to decide whether a failure is fatal or not (see the next patch). Signed-off-by: Max Reitz --- block.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/block.c b/block.c index 3029f5c302..f5d7f4d971 100644 --- a/block.c +++ b/block.c @@ -1706,7 +1706,8 @@ static int bdrv_fill_options(QDict **options, const char *filename, static int bdrv_child_check_perm(BdrvChild *c, BlockReopenQueue *q, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared, - GSList *ignore_children, Error **errp); + GSList *ignore_children, + bool *tighten_restrictions, Error **errp); static void bdrv_child_abort_perm_update(BdrvChild *c); static void bdrv_child_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared); static void bdrv_get_cumulative_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t *perm, @@ -1781,18 +1782,43 @@ static void bdrv_child_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState *child_bs, * permissions of all its parents. This involves checking whether all necessary * permission changes to child nodes can be performed. * + * Will set *tighten_restrictions to true if and only if new permissions have to + * be taken or currently shared permissions are to be unshared. Otherwise, + * errors are not fatal as long as the caller accepts that the restrictions + * remain tighter than they need to be. The caller still has to abort the + * transaction. + * @tighten_restrictions cannot be used together with @q: When reopening, we may + * encounter fatal errors even though no restrictions are to be tightened. For + * example, changing a node from RW to RO will fail if the WRITE permission is + * to be kept. + * * A call to this function must always be followed by a call to bdrv_set_perm() * or bdrv_abort_perm_update(). */ static int bdrv_check_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockReopenQueue *q, uint64_t cumulative_perms, uint64_t cumulative_shared_perms, - GSList *ignore_children, Error **errp) + GSList *ignore_children, + bool *tighten_restrictions, Error **errp) { BlockDriver *drv = bs->drv; BdrvChild *c; int ret; + assert(!q || !tighten_restrictions); + + if (tighten_restrictions) { + uint64_t current_perms, current_shared; + uint64_t added_perms, removed_shared_perms; + + bdrv_get_cumulative_perm(bs, ¤t_perms, ¤t_shared); + + added_perms = cumulative_perms & ~current_perms; + removed_shared_perms = current_shared & ~cumulative_shared_perms; + + *tighten_restrictions = added_perms || removed_shared_perms; + } + /* Write permissions never work with read-only images */ if ((cumulative_perms & (BLK_PERM_WRITE | BLK_PERM_WRITE_UNCHANGED)) && !bdrv_is_writable_after_reopen(bs, q)) @@ -1833,11 +1859,18 @@ static int bdrv_check_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockReopenQueue *q, /* Check all children */ QLIST_FOREACH(c, &bs->children, next) { uint64_t cur_perm, cur_shared; + bool child_tighten_restr; + bdrv_child_perm(bs, c->bs, c, c->role, q, cumulative_perms, cumulative_shared_perms, &cur_perm, &cur_shared); - ret = bdrv_child_check_perm(c, q, cur_perm, cur_shared, - ignore_children, errp); + ret = bdrv_child_check_perm(c, q, cur_perm, cur_shared, ignore_children, + tighten_restrictions ? &child_tighten_restr + : NULL, + errp); + if (tighten_restrictions) { + *tighten_restrictions |= child_tighten_restr; + } if (ret < 0) { return ret; } @@ -1961,17 +1994,23 @@ char *bdrv_perm_names(uint64_t perm) * set, the BdrvChild objects in this list are ignored in the calculations; * this allows checking permission updates for an existing reference. * + * See bdrv_check_perm() for the semantics of @tighten_restrictions. + * * Needs to be followed by a call to either bdrv_set_perm() or * bdrv_abort_perm_update(). */ static int bdrv_check_update_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockReopenQueue *q, uint64_t new_used_perm, uint64_t new_shared_perm, - GSList *ignore_children, Error **errp) + GSList *ignore_children, + bool *tighten_restrictions, + Error **errp) { BdrvChild *c; uint64_t cumulative_perms = new_used_perm; uint64_t cumulative_shared_perms = new_shared_perm; + assert(!q || !tighten_restrictions); + /* There is no reason why anyone couldn't tolerate write_unchanged */ assert(new_shared_perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE_UNCHANGED); @@ -1983,6 +2022,11 @@ static int bdrv_check_update_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockReopenQueue *q, if ((new_used_perm & c->shared_perm) != new_used_perm) { char *user = bdrv_child_user_desc(c); char *perm_names = bdrv_perm_names(new_used_perm & ~c->shared_perm); + + if (tighten_restrictions) { + *tighten_restrictions = true; + } + error_setg(errp, "Conflicts with use by %s as '%s', which does not " "allow '%s' on %s", user, c->name, perm_names, bdrv_get_node_name(c->bs)); @@ -1994,6 +2038,11 @@ static int bdrv_check_update_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockReopenQueue *q, if ((c->perm & new_shared_perm) != c->perm) { char *user = bdrv_child_user_desc(c); char *perm_names = bdrv_perm_names(c->perm & ~new_shared_perm); + + if (tighten_restrictions) { + *tighten_restrictions = true; + } + error_setg(errp, "Conflicts with use by %s as '%s', which uses " "'%s' on %s", user, c->name, perm_names, bdrv_get_node_name(c->bs)); @@ -2007,19 +2056,21 @@ static int bdrv_check_update_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockReopenQueue *q, } return bdrv_check_perm(bs, q, cumulative_perms, cumulative_shared_perms, - ignore_children, errp); + ignore_children, tighten_restrictions, errp); } /* Needs to be followed by a call to either bdrv_child_set_perm() or * bdrv_child_abort_perm_update(). */ static int bdrv_child_check_perm(BdrvChild *c, BlockReopenQueue *q, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared, - GSList *ignore_children, Error **errp) + GSList *ignore_children, + bool *tighten_restrictions, Error **errp) { int ret; ignore_children = g_slist_prepend(g_slist_copy(ignore_children), c); - ret = bdrv_check_update_perm(c->bs, q, perm, shared, ignore_children, errp); + ret = bdrv_check_update_perm(c->bs, q, perm, shared, ignore_children, + tighten_restrictions, errp); g_slist_free(ignore_children); if (ret < 0) { @@ -2072,7 +2123,7 @@ int bdrv_child_try_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared, { int ret; - ret = bdrv_child_check_perm(c, NULL, perm, shared, NULL, errp); + ret = bdrv_child_check_perm(c, NULL, perm, shared, NULL, NULL, errp); if (ret < 0) { bdrv_child_abort_perm_update(c); return ret; @@ -2258,7 +2309,8 @@ static void bdrv_replace_child(BdrvChild *child, BlockDriverState *new_bs) * because we're just taking a parent away, so we're loosening * restrictions. */ bdrv_get_cumulative_perm(old_bs, &perm, &shared_perm); - bdrv_check_perm(old_bs, NULL, perm, shared_perm, NULL, &error_abort); + bdrv_check_perm(old_bs, NULL, perm, shared_perm, NULL, + NULL, &error_abort); bdrv_set_perm(old_bs, perm, shared_perm); } } @@ -2279,7 +2331,8 @@ BdrvChild *bdrv_root_attach_child(BlockDriverState *child_bs, BdrvChild *child; int ret; - ret = bdrv_check_update_perm(child_bs, NULL, perm, shared_perm, NULL, errp); + ret = bdrv_check_update_perm(child_bs, NULL, perm, shared_perm, NULL, NULL, + errp); if (ret < 0) { bdrv_abort_perm_update(child_bs); bdrv_unref(child_bs); @@ -3333,7 +3386,7 @@ int bdrv_reopen_multiple(BlockReopenQueue *bs_queue, Error **errp) QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(bs_entry, bs_queue, entry) { BDRVReopenState *state = &bs_entry->state; ret = bdrv_check_perm(state->bs, bs_queue, state->perm, - state->shared_perm, NULL, errp); + state->shared_perm, NULL, NULL, errp); if (ret < 0) { goto cleanup_perm; } @@ -3345,7 +3398,7 @@ int bdrv_reopen_multiple(BlockReopenQueue *bs_queue, Error **errp) state->perm, state->shared_perm, &nperm, &nshared); ret = bdrv_check_update_perm(state->new_backing_bs, NULL, - nperm, nshared, NULL, errp); + nperm, nshared, NULL, NULL, errp); if (ret < 0) { goto cleanup_perm; } @@ -4062,7 +4115,7 @@ void bdrv_replace_node(BlockDriverState *from, BlockDriverState *to, /* Check whether the required permissions can be granted on @to, ignoring * all BdrvChild in @list so that they can't block themselves. */ - ret = bdrv_check_update_perm(to, NULL, perm, shared, list, errp); + ret = bdrv_check_update_perm(to, NULL, perm, shared, list, NULL, errp); if (ret < 0) { bdrv_abort_perm_update(to); goto out; @@ -4410,7 +4463,7 @@ int bdrv_drop_intermediate(BlockDriverState *top, BlockDriverState *base, /* Check whether we are allowed to switch c from top to base */ GSList *ignore_children = g_slist_prepend(NULL, c); ret = bdrv_check_update_perm(base, NULL, c->perm, c->shared_perm, - ignore_children, &local_err); + ignore_children, NULL, &local_err); g_slist_free(ignore_children); if (ret < 0) { error_report_err(local_err); @@ -5185,7 +5238,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_invalidate_cache(BlockDriverState *bs, */ bs->open_flags &= ~BDRV_O_INACTIVE; bdrv_get_cumulative_perm(bs, &perm, &shared_perm); - ret = bdrv_check_perm(bs, NULL, perm, shared_perm, NULL, &local_err); + ret = bdrv_check_perm(bs, NULL, perm, shared_perm, NULL, NULL, &local_err); if (ret < 0) { bs->open_flags |= BDRV_O_INACTIVE; error_propagate(errp, local_err); @@ -5335,7 +5388,7 @@ static int bdrv_inactivate_recurse(BlockDriverState *bs) /* Update permissions, they may differ for inactive nodes */ bdrv_get_cumulative_perm(bs, &perm, &shared_perm); - bdrv_check_perm(bs, NULL, perm, shared_perm, NULL, &error_abort); + bdrv_check_perm(bs, NULL, perm, shared_perm, NULL, NULL, &error_abort); bdrv_set_perm(bs, perm, shared_perm);