From patchwork Fri Dec 21 09:35:20 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: John Snow X-Patchwork-Id: 1017446 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43LkBH3M5xz9sDN for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 20:40:07 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44573 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaHHp-00032j-2a for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 04:40:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaHDi-0008Mo-9y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 04:35:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaHDh-00074N-Gb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 04:35:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaHDd-0006vv-Uw; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 04:35:46 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20506796E8; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from probe.redhat.com (ovpn-121-225.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.121.225]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3634AC; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:35:35 +0000 (UTC) From: John Snow To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 04:35:20 -0500 Message-Id: <20181221093529.23855-3-jsnow@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20181221093529.23855-1-jsnow@redhat.com> References: <20181221093529.23855-1-jsnow@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:35:37 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 02/11] block/dirty-bitmap: remove assertion from restore X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Kevin Wolf , vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, Markus Armbruster , Max Reitz , John Snow Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" When making a backup of a dirty bitmap (for transactions), we want to restore that backup whether or not the bitmap is enabled. It is perfectly valid to write into bitmaps that are disabled. It is only illegitimate for the guest to have done so. Remove this assertion. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Signed-off-by: John Snow --- block/dirty-bitmap.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c index 89fd1d7f8b..6b688394e4 100644 --- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c +++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c @@ -625,7 +625,6 @@ void bdrv_clear_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, HBitmap **out) void bdrv_restore_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, HBitmap *backup) { HBitmap *tmp = bitmap->bitmap; - assert(bdrv_dirty_bitmap_enabled(bitmap)); assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_readonly(bitmap)); bitmap->bitmap = backup; hbitmap_free(tmp);