From patchwork Tue Sep 19 16:43:33 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Cornelia Huck X-Patchwork-Id: 815689 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xxTmg4D1Bz9s7F for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 03:06:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44179 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duLyb-0008LV-Ht for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:06:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duLfD-0007iC-SQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:46:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duLfD-0004Lq-4y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:46:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duLfC-0004LJ-Vw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:46:23 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1D475F7AD; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:46:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com F1D475F7AD Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=cohuck@redhat.com Received: from localhost (unknown [10.36.117.0]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C08A5D6A4; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:46:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: peter.maydell@linaro.org Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:43:33 +0200 Message-Id: <20170919164337.18555-35-cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170919164337.18555-1-cohuck@redhat.com> References: <20170919164337.18555-1-cohuck@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:46:22 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 34/38] configure: Allow --enable-seccomp on s390x, too X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, Cornelia Huck , agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Thomas Huth libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch, so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth Message-Id: <1505385363-27717-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger Acked-by: Eduardo Otubo Acked-by: Halil Pasic Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck --- configure | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure b/configure index 94db2d103e..cb0f7ed0ab 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ if test "$seccomp" != "no" ; then arm|aarch64) libseccomp_minver="2.2.3" ;; - ppc|ppc64) + ppc|ppc64|s390x) libseccomp_minver="2.3.0" ;; *)