From patchwork Tue Sep 12 11:28:51 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= X-Patchwork-Id: 812797 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xs2dy27nBz9s7B for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:30:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drjOO-0003IK-A8 for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:30:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53809) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drjNQ-0002zO-J3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:29:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drjNP-0004RH-GG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:29:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drjNN-0004Pe-4q; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:29:09 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4661081DEF; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:29:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 4661081DEF Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [10.42.22.189]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F141D6C41C; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:29:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daniel P. Berrange" To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 12:28:51 +0100 Message-Id: <20170912112855.24269-4-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170912112855.24269-1-berrange@redhat.com> References: <20170912112855.24269-1-berrange@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:29:08 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/7] block: fix data type casting for crypto payload offset X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" The crypto APIs report the offset of the data payload as an uint64_t type, but the block driver is casting to size_t or ssize_t which will potentially truncate. Most of the block APIs use int64_t for offsets meanwhile, so even if using uint64_t in the crypto block driver we are still at risk of truncation. Change the block crypto driver to use uint64_t, but add asserts that the value is less than INT64_MAX. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange Reviewed-by: Max Reitz Reviewed-by: Eric Blake --- block/crypto.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/crypto.c b/block/crypto.c index cc8afe0e0d..d68cbac2ac 100644 --- a/block/crypto.c +++ b/block/crypto.c @@ -364,8 +364,9 @@ static int block_crypto_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset, PreallocMode prealloc, Error **errp) { BlockCrypto *crypto = bs->opaque; - size_t payload_offset = + uint64_t payload_offset = qcrypto_block_get_payload_offset(crypto->block); + assert(payload_offset < (INT64_MAX - offset)); offset += payload_offset; @@ -391,8 +392,9 @@ block_crypto_co_readv(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, uint8_t *cipher_data = NULL; QEMUIOVector hd_qiov; int ret = 0; - size_t payload_offset = + uint64_t payload_offset = qcrypto_block_get_payload_offset(crypto->block) / 512; + assert(payload_offset < (INT64_MAX / 512)); qemu_iovec_init(&hd_qiov, qiov->niov); @@ -458,8 +460,9 @@ block_crypto_co_writev(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, uint8_t *cipher_data = NULL; QEMUIOVector hd_qiov; int ret = 0; - size_t payload_offset = + uint64_t payload_offset = qcrypto_block_get_payload_offset(crypto->block) / 512; + assert(payload_offset < (INT64_MAX / 512)); qemu_iovec_init(&hd_qiov, qiov->niov); @@ -520,7 +523,9 @@ static int64_t block_crypto_getlength(BlockDriverState *bs) BlockCrypto *crypto = bs->opaque; int64_t len = bdrv_getlength(bs->file->bs); - ssize_t offset = qcrypto_block_get_payload_offset(crypto->block); + uint64_t offset = qcrypto_block_get_payload_offset(crypto->block); + assert(offset < INT64_MAX); + assert(offset < len); len -= offset;