@@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ static BlockJob *test_block_job_start(unsigned int iterations,
s->result = result;
data->job = s;
data->result = result;
- block_job_start(&s->common);
return &s->common;
}
@@ -123,6 +122,7 @@ static void test_single_job(int expected)
txn = block_job_txn_new();
job = test_block_job_start(1, true, expected, &result);
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job);
+ block_job_start(job);
if (expected == -ECANCELED) {
block_job_cancel(job);
@@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ static void test_pair_jobs(int expected1, int expected2)
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job1);
job2 = test_block_job_start(2, true, expected2, &result2);
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job2);
+ block_job_start(job1);
+ block_job_start(job2);
if (expected1 == -ECANCELED) {
block_job_cancel(job1);
@@ -223,6 +225,8 @@ static void test_pair_jobs_fail_cancel_race(void)
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job1);
job2 = test_block_job_start(2, false, 0, &result2);
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job2);
+ block_job_start(job1);
+ block_job_start(job2);
block_job_cancel(job1);
Previously, before test_block_job_start returns, the job can already complete, as a result, the transactional state of other jobs added to the same txn later cannot be handled correctly. Move the block_job_start() calls to callers after block_job_txn_add_job() calls. Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> --- tests/test-blockjob-txn.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)