diff mbox series

[PULL,33/77] monitor: do not use QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE across critical sections

Message ID 1549305379-51117-34-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series [PULL,01/77] vhost-user-test: use g_cond_broadcast | expand

Commit Message

Paolo Bonzini Feb. 4, 2019, 6:35 p.m. UTC 
monitor_qmp_requests_pop_any_with_lock cannot modify the monitor list
concurrently with monitor_cleanup, since the dispatch bottom half
runs in the main thread, but anyway it is a bit ugly to keep
"next" live across critical sections of monitor_lock and Coverity
complains (CID 1397072).

Replace QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE with a while loop and QTAILQ_FIRST,
it is cleaner and more future-proof.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 monitor.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
index c09fa63..e5de576 100644
--- a/monitor.c
+++ b/monitor.c
@@ -4617,8 +4617,6 @@  void monitor_init(Chardev *chr, int flags)
 
 void monitor_cleanup(void)
 {
-    Monitor *mon, *next;
-
     /*
      * We need to explicitly stop the I/O thread (but not destroy it),
      * clean up the monitor resources, then destroy the I/O thread since
@@ -4632,7 +4630,8 @@  void monitor_cleanup(void)
     /* Flush output buffers and destroy monitors */
     qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock);
     monitor_destroyed = true;
-    QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(mon, &mon_list, entry, next) {
+    while (!QTAILQ_EMPTY(&mon_list)) {
+        Monitor *mon = QTAILQ_FIRST(&mon_list);
         QTAILQ_REMOVE(&mon_list, mon, entry);
         /* Permit QAPI event emission from character frontend release */
         qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock);