Message ID | 1445903114-22566-4-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 10/26/2015 05:45 PM, John Snow wrote: > Reported-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> > --- > qemu-io-cmds.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/qemu-io-cmds.c b/qemu-io-cmds.c > index 44d24e8..92c6b87 100644 > --- a/qemu-io-cmds.c > +++ b/qemu-io-cmds.c > @@ -146,6 +146,21 @@ static int64_t cvtnum(const char *s) > return ret; > } > > +static void print_cvtnum_err(int64_t rc, const char *arg) > +{ > + switch (rc) { > + case -EINVAL: > + printf("Parsing error: non-numeric argument," > + " or extraneous/unrecognized suffix -- %s\n", arg); > + break; > + case -ERANGE: > + printf("Parsing error: argument too large -- %s\n", arg); > + break; > + default: > + printf("Parsing error -- %s\n", arg); I still think ':' is better than ' --' in error messages, but I'll leave it up to the maintainer.
Am 27.10.2015 um 00:45 hat John Snow geschrieben: > Reported-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Am 27.10.2015 um 03:26 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > On 10/26/2015 05:45 PM, John Snow wrote: > > Reported-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> > > --- > > qemu-io-cmds.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/qemu-io-cmds.c b/qemu-io-cmds.c > > index 44d24e8..92c6b87 100644 > > --- a/qemu-io-cmds.c > > +++ b/qemu-io-cmds.c > > @@ -146,6 +146,21 @@ static int64_t cvtnum(const char *s) > > return ret; > > } > > > > +static void print_cvtnum_err(int64_t rc, const char *arg) > > +{ > > + switch (rc) { > > + case -EINVAL: > > + printf("Parsing error: non-numeric argument," > > + " or extraneous/unrecognized suffix -- %s\n", arg); > > + break; > > + case -ERANGE: > > + printf("Parsing error: argument too large -- %s\n", arg); > > + break; > > + default: > > + printf("Parsing error -- %s\n", arg); > > I still think ':' is better than ' --' in error messages, but I'll leave > it up to the maintainer. This isn't important enough for a maintainer decision - if this isn't something that the patch submitter can decide by himself, what else would be left? In particular because the patch only retains the existing format. I'm happy to merge a patch that uses colons instead, but I won't reject anything just because it doesn't do the conversion. Kevin
On 10/26/2015 10:26 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/26/2015 05:45 PM, John Snow wrote: >> Reported-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> >> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> >> --- >> qemu-io-cmds.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- >> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/qemu-io-cmds.c b/qemu-io-cmds.c >> index 44d24e8..92c6b87 100644 >> --- a/qemu-io-cmds.c >> +++ b/qemu-io-cmds.c >> @@ -146,6 +146,21 @@ static int64_t cvtnum(const char *s) >> return ret; >> } >> >> +static void print_cvtnum_err(int64_t rc, const char *arg) >> +{ >> + switch (rc) { >> + case -EINVAL: >> + printf("Parsing error: non-numeric argument," >> + " or extraneous/unrecognized suffix -- %s\n", arg); >> + break; >> + case -ERANGE: >> + printf("Parsing error: argument too large -- %s\n", arg); >> + break; >> + default: >> + printf("Parsing error -- %s\n", arg); > > I still think ':' is better than ' --' in error messages, but I'll leave > it up to the maintainer. > Crud, sorry Eric -- I didn't do this on purpose. As Kevin notes, I was just trying to match the existing format. I can change it and send again if you want. Whatever is easiest for people. --js
Am 27.10.2015 um 16:50 hat John Snow geschrieben: > > > On 10/26/2015 10:26 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 10/26/2015 05:45 PM, John Snow wrote: > >> Reported-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> > >> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> > >> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> > >> --- > >> qemu-io-cmds.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > >> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/qemu-io-cmds.c b/qemu-io-cmds.c > >> index 44d24e8..92c6b87 100644 > >> --- a/qemu-io-cmds.c > >> +++ b/qemu-io-cmds.c > >> @@ -146,6 +146,21 @@ static int64_t cvtnum(const char *s) > >> return ret; > >> } > >> > >> +static void print_cvtnum_err(int64_t rc, const char *arg) > >> +{ > >> + switch (rc) { > >> + case -EINVAL: > >> + printf("Parsing error: non-numeric argument," > >> + " or extraneous/unrecognized suffix -- %s\n", arg); > >> + break; > >> + case -ERANGE: > >> + printf("Parsing error: argument too large -- %s\n", arg); > >> + break; > >> + default: > >> + printf("Parsing error -- %s\n", arg); > > > > I still think ':' is better than ' --' in error messages, but I'll leave > > it up to the maintainer. > > Crud, sorry Eric -- I didn't do this on purpose. As Kevin notes, I was > just trying to match the existing format. I can change it and send again > if you want. Whatever is easiest for people. I think you need to respin for patch 1 anyway, so changing it in the next version sounds good. You can keep my R-b when doing this. Kevin
On 10/27/2015 09:50 AM, John Snow wrote: >>> + default: >>> + printf("Parsing error -- %s\n", arg); >> >> I still think ':' is better than ' --' in error messages, but I'll leave >> it up to the maintainer. >> > > Crud, sorry Eric -- I didn't do this on purpose. As Kevin notes, I was > just trying to match the existing format. I can change it and send again > if you want. Whatever is easiest for people. And Kevin has a valid point that you just did code motion, so keeping -- is no worse than before. At this point, I'll leave it up to you; my R-b stands either way.
diff --git a/qemu-io-cmds.c b/qemu-io-cmds.c index 44d24e8..92c6b87 100644 --- a/qemu-io-cmds.c +++ b/qemu-io-cmds.c @@ -146,6 +146,21 @@ static int64_t cvtnum(const char *s) return ret; } +static void print_cvtnum_err(int64_t rc, const char *arg) +{ + switch (rc) { + case -EINVAL: + printf("Parsing error: non-numeric argument," + " or extraneous/unrecognized suffix -- %s\n", arg); + break; + case -ERANGE: + printf("Parsing error: argument too large -- %s\n", arg); + break; + default: + printf("Parsing error -- %s\n", arg); + } +} + #define EXABYTES(x) ((long long)(x) << 60) #define PETABYTES(x) ((long long)(x) << 50) #define TERABYTES(x) ((long long)(x) << 40) @@ -366,13 +381,13 @@ create_iovec(BlockBackend *blk, QEMUIOVector *qiov, char **argv, int nr_iov, len = cvtnum(arg); if (len < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", arg); + print_cvtnum_err(len, arg); goto fail; } /* should be SIZE_T_MAX, but that doesn't exist */ if (len > INT_MAX) { - printf("too large length argument -- %s\n", arg); + printf("Argument '%s' exceeds maximum size %d\n", arg, INT_MAX); goto fail; } @@ -667,7 +682,7 @@ static int read_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) lflag = 1; pattern_count = cvtnum(optarg); if (pattern_count < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", optarg); + print_cvtnum_err(pattern_count, optarg); return 0; } break; @@ -688,7 +703,7 @@ static int read_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) sflag = 1; pattern_offset = cvtnum(optarg); if (pattern_offset < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", optarg); + print_cvtnum_err(pattern_offset, optarg); return 0; } break; @@ -711,14 +726,14 @@ static int read_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]); if (offset < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", argv[optind]); + print_cvtnum_err(offset, argv[optind]); return 0; } optind++; count = cvtnum(argv[optind]); if (count < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", argv[optind]); + print_cvtnum_err(count, argv[optind]); return 0; } @@ -869,7 +884,7 @@ static int readv_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]); if (offset < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", argv[optind]); + print_cvtnum_err(offset, argv[optind]); return 0; } optind++; @@ -1018,14 +1033,14 @@ static int write_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]); if (offset < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", argv[optind]); + print_cvtnum_err(offset, argv[optind]); return 0; } optind++; count = cvtnum(argv[optind]); if (count < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", argv[optind]); + print_cvtnum_err(count, argv[optind]); return 0; } @@ -1150,7 +1165,7 @@ static int writev_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]); if (offset < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", argv[optind]); + print_cvtnum_err(offset, argv[optind]); return 0; } optind++; @@ -1277,7 +1292,7 @@ static int multiwrite_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) /* Read the offset of the request */ offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]); if (offset < 0) { - printf("non-numeric offset argument -- %s\n", argv[optind]); + print_cvtnum_err(offset, argv[optind]); goto out; } optind++; @@ -1504,7 +1519,7 @@ static int aio_read_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) ctx->offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]); if (ctx->offset < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", argv[optind]); + print_cvtnum_err(ctx->offset, argv[optind]); g_free(ctx); return 0; } @@ -1599,7 +1614,7 @@ static int aio_write_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) ctx->offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]); if (ctx->offset < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", argv[optind]); + print_cvtnum_err(ctx->offset, argv[optind]); g_free(ctx); return 0; } @@ -1659,7 +1674,7 @@ static int truncate_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) offset = cvtnum(argv[1]); if (offset < 0) { - printf("non-numeric truncate argument -- %s\n", argv[1]); + print_cvtnum_err(offset, argv[1]); return 0; } @@ -1806,14 +1821,14 @@ static int discard_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) offset = cvtnum(argv[optind]); if (offset < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", argv[optind]); + print_cvtnum_err(offset, argv[optind]); return 0; } optind++; count = cvtnum(argv[optind]); if (count < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", argv[optind]); + print_cvtnum_err(count, argv[optind]); return 0; } @@ -1847,7 +1862,7 @@ static int alloc_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) offset = cvtnum(argv[1]); if (offset < 0) { - printf("non-numeric offset argument -- %s\n", argv[1]); + print_cvtnum_err(offset, argv[1]); return 0; } else if (offset & 0x1ff) { printf("offset %" PRId64 " is not sector aligned\n", @@ -1858,7 +1873,7 @@ static int alloc_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) if (argc == 3) { nb_sectors = cvtnum(argv[2]); if (nb_sectors < 0) { - printf("non-numeric length argument -- %s\n", argv[2]); + print_cvtnum_err(nb_sectors, argv[2]); return 0; } } else { @@ -2199,7 +2214,7 @@ static int sigraise_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char **argv) { int64_t sig = cvtnum(argv[1]); if (sig < 0) { - printf("non-numeric signal number argument -- %s\n", argv[1]); + print_cvtnum_err(sig, argv[1]); return 0; } else if (sig > NSIG) { printf("signal argument '%s' is too large to be a valid signal\n",