diff mbox

[for,2.4,2/3] net/dp8393x: specify memory operations for PROM PROM

Message ID 1437763343-7980-3-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Hervé Poussineau July 24, 2015, 6:42 p.m. UTC
This fixes a guest-triggerable QEMU crash when guest tries to write to PROM.

Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau <hpoussin@reactos.org>
---
 hw/net/dp8393x.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Aurelien Jarno July 26, 2015, 8:11 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2015-07-24 20:42, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
> This fixes a guest-triggerable QEMU crash when guest tries to write to PROM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau <hpoussin@reactos.org>
> ---
>  hw/net/dp8393x.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/net/dp8393x.c b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> index 8fafdb0..55168b5 100644
> --- a/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> +++ b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> @@ -601,6 +601,16 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps dp8393x_ops = {
>      .endianness = DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN,
>  };
>  
> +static bool dp8393x_rom_accepts(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned int size,
> +                                bool is_write)
> +{
> +    return !is_write;
> +}
> +
> +static const MemoryRegionOps dp8393x_rom_ops = {
> +    .valid.accepts = dp8393x_rom_accepts,
> +};
> +
>  static void dp8393x_watchdog(void *opaque)
>  {
>      dp8393xState *s = opaque;
> @@ -840,7 +850,7 @@ static void dp8393x_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>      s->watchdog = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, dp8393x_watchdog, s);
>      s->regs[SONIC_SR] = 0x0004; /* only revision recognized by Linux */
>  
> -    memory_region_init_rom_device(&s->prom, OBJECT(dev), NULL, NULL,
> +    memory_region_init_rom_device(&s->prom, OBJECT(dev), &dp8393x_rom_ops, NULL,
>                                    "dp8393x-prom", SONIC_PROM_SIZE, NULL);
>      prom = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(&s->prom);
>      checksum = 0;

How does it crashes in that case? I would have guess that write access
to ROM are ignored by default. Looking at other code, it seems they call
memory_region_set_readonly() instead of providing an accepts function.
Maybe readonly should be the default for a rom device?
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/hw/net/dp8393x.c b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
index 8fafdb0..55168b5 100644
--- a/hw/net/dp8393x.c
+++ b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
@@ -601,6 +601,16 @@  static const MemoryRegionOps dp8393x_ops = {
     .endianness = DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN,
 };
 
+static bool dp8393x_rom_accepts(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned int size,
+                                bool is_write)
+{
+    return !is_write;
+}
+
+static const MemoryRegionOps dp8393x_rom_ops = {
+    .valid.accepts = dp8393x_rom_accepts,
+};
+
 static void dp8393x_watchdog(void *opaque)
 {
     dp8393xState *s = opaque;
@@ -840,7 +850,7 @@  static void dp8393x_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
     s->watchdog = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, dp8393x_watchdog, s);
     s->regs[SONIC_SR] = 0x0004; /* only revision recognized by Linux */
 
-    memory_region_init_rom_device(&s->prom, OBJECT(dev), NULL, NULL,
+    memory_region_init_rom_device(&s->prom, OBJECT(dev), &dp8393x_rom_ops, NULL,
                                   "dp8393x-prom", SONIC_PROM_SIZE, NULL);
     prom = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(&s->prom);
     checksum = 0;