Message ID | 20230217201150.22032-1-farosas@suse.de |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | target/arm: Allow CONFIG_TCG=n builds | expand |
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 at 20:13, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> wrote: > > Addressed Peter's comments and dropped the cpregs change which is not > related to fixing the --disable-tcg build. This unblocks the xenpvh > series and I can tackle the regs split without holding up the build > work. I've applied up to and including [PATCH v6 15/29] cpu-defs.h: Expose CPUTLBEntryFull to non-TCG code to target-arm.next, and also [PATCH v6 25/29] tests/avocado: add machine:none tag to version.py (and some of the rest were already upstream). thanks -- PMM
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 at 20:13, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> wrote: >> >> Addressed Peter's comments and dropped the cpregs change which is not >> related to fixing the --disable-tcg build. This unblocks the xenpvh >> series and I can tackle the regs split without holding up the build >> work. > > I've applied up to and including > [PATCH v6 15/29] cpu-defs.h: Expose CPUTLBEntryFull to non-TCG code > to target-arm.next, and also > [PATCH v6 25/29] tests/avocado: add machine:none tag to version.py > (and some of the rest were already upstream). Thanks! I had a couple of days off, I'll address the feedback on the rest of the series right away.