| Message ID | 20210518083901.97369-1-pbonzini@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | block: file-posix queue | expand |
Am 18.05.2021 um 10:38 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > Hi Max/Kevin, > > this is a combination of two series that both affect host block device > support in block/file-posix.c. I suspect both of them evaded your radar, > so I'm grouping them together and sending them out again. Is this based on any other series? The first two patches seem to fail to apply, on my block branch as well as on master. Kevin
On 18/05/21 15:23, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 18.05.2021 um 10:38 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: >> Hi Max/Kevin, >> >> this is a combination of two series that both affect host block device >> support in block/file-posix.c. I suspect both of them evaded your radar, >> so I'm grouping them together and sending them out again. > > Is this based on any other series? The first two patches seem to fail to > apply, on my block branch as well as on master. It should have been six patches not five. I'll resend. Paolo
Hi Max/Kevin, this is a combination of two series that both affect host block device support in block/file-posix.c. I suspect both of them evaded your radar, so I'm grouping them together and sending them out again. Joelle van Dyne (3): block: feature detection for host block support block: check for sys/disk.h block: detect DKIOCGETBLOCKCOUNT/SIZE before use Paolo Bonzini (2): file-posix: try BLKSECTGET on block devices too, do not round to power of 2 file-posix: fix max_iov for /dev/sg devices block.c | 2 +- block/file-posix.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- meson.build | 7 ++- qapi/block-core.json | 10 +++-- 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)