Message ID | 20180213202701.15858-1-eblake@redhat.com |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3zgvcr5Gt4z9t1t for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:43:08 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46849 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org>) id 1elhPu-0003XB-PV for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:43:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52828) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eblake@redhat.com>) id 1elhAm-0008HN-79 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:27:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eblake@redhat.com>) id 1elhAj-0007k6-Ce for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:27:28 -0500 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:47296 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eblake@redhat.com>) id 1elhAe-0007em-3V; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:27:20 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8A278182D17; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 20:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from red.redhat.com (ovpn-122-122.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.122.122]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBC12026DFD; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 20:27:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:26:40 -0600 Message-Id: <20180213202701.15858-1-eblake@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.8]); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 20:27:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.8]); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 20:27:09 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.4' DOMAIN:'int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'eblake@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.187.233.73 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 00/21] add byte-based block_status driver callbacks X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" <qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org> |
Series |
add byte-based block_status driver callbacks
|
expand
|
Am 13.02.2018 um 21:26 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS, > but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the > reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even > much higher levels). I've therefore started the task of > converting our block status code to report at a byte granularity > rather than sectors. > > These patches have been around for a while, but it's time to > finish it now that 2.12 is open for patches. Thanks, touched up patch 8 and applied to the block branch. Kevin