[v2] parser: Unmangle From: headers that have been mangled for DMARC purposes

To avoid triggering spam filters due to failed signature validation, many
mailing lists mangle the From header to change the From address to be the
address of the list, typically where the sender's domain has a strict DMARC
policy enabled.

In this case, we should try to unmangle the From header.

Add support for using the X-Original-From or Reply-To headers, as used by
Google Groups and Mailman respectively, to unmangle the From header when
necessary and associate the patch with the correct submitter based on the
unmangled email address.

When downloading mboxes, rewrite the From header using the unmangled
address, and preserve the original header as X-Patchwork-Original-From in
case someone needs it for some reason. The original From header will still
be stored in the database and exposed via the API, as we want to keep
messages as close to the original received format as possible.

Closes: #64 ("Incorrect submitter when using googlegroups")
Reported-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>

---

v1->v2:
- use X-Original-From rather than X-Original-Sender
- unmangle From header when downloading mbox

rewrite from header

Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>

use x original from

Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
---
 patchwork/parser.py               | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 patchwork/tests/test_mboxviews.py | 21 +++++++++
 patchwork/tests/test_parser.py    | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 patchwork/views/utils.py          | 12 +++++
 4 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> To avoid triggering spam filters due to failed signature validation, many
> mailing lists mangle the From header to change the From address to be the
> address of the list, typically where the sender's domain has a strict DMARC
> policy enabled.
>
> In this case, we should try to unmangle the From header.
>
> Add support for using the X-Original-From or Reply-To headers, as used by
> Google Groups and Mailman respectively, to unmangle the From header when
> necessary and associate the patch with the correct submitter based on the
> unmangled email address.
>
> When downloading mboxes, rewrite the From header using the unmangled
> address, and preserve the original header as X-Patchwork-Original-From in
> case someone needs it for some reason. The original From header will still
> be stored in the database and exposed via the API, as we want to keep
> messages as close to the original received format as possible.
>
> Closes: #64 ("Incorrect submitter when using googlegroups")
> Reported-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>

Tested-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> # mailman only

I'll apply it shortly to master. You could convince me to get it
backported to stable if you really wanted.

Do we need something to go through the db and fix up old ones? Or is it
best to let sleeping patches lie?

Regards,
Daniel
>
> ---
>
> v1->v2:
> - use X-Original-From rather than X-Original-Sender
> - unmangle From header when downloading mbox
>
> rewrite from header
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
>
> use x original from
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  patchwork/parser.py               | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  patchwork/tests/test_mboxviews.py | 21 +++++++++
>  patchwork/tests/test_parser.py    | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  patchwork/views/utils.py          | 12 +++++
>  4 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/patchwork/parser.py b/patchwork/parser.py
> index 7dc66bc05a5b..be1e51652dd3 100644
> --- a/patchwork/parser.py
> +++ b/patchwork/parser.py
> @@ -321,12 +321,7 @@ def find_series(project, mail, author):
>      return _find_series_by_markers(project, mail, author)
>  
>  
> -def get_or_create_author(mail):
> -    from_header = clean_header(mail.get('From'))
> -
> -    if not from_header:
> -        raise ValueError("Invalid 'From' header")
> -
> +def split_from_header(from_header):
>      name, email = (None, None)
>  
>      # tuple of (regex, fn)
> @@ -355,6 +350,65 @@ def get_or_create_author(mail):
>              (name, email) = fn(match.groups())
>              break
>  
> +    return (name, email)
> +
> +
> +# Unmangle From addresses that have been mangled for DMARC purposes.
> +#
> +# To avoid triggering spam filters due to failed signature validation, many
> +# mailing lists mangle the From header to change the From address to be the
> +# address of the list, typically where the sender's domain has a strict
> +# DMARC policy enabled.
> +#
> +# Unfortunately, there's no standardised way of preserving the original
> +# From address.
> +#
> +# Google Groups adds an X-Original-From header. If present, we use that.
> +#
> +# Mailman preserves the original address by adding a Reply-To, except in the
> +# case where the list is set to either reply to list, or reply to a specific
> +# address, in which case the original From is added to Cc instead. These corner
> +# cases are dumb, but we try and handle things as sensibly as possible by
> +# looking for a name in Reply-To/Cc that matches From. It's inexact but should
> +# be good enough for our purposes.
> +def get_original_sender(mail, name, email):
> +    if name and ' via ' in name:
> +        # Mailman uses the format "<name> via <list>"
> +        # Google Groups uses "'<name>' via <list>"
> +        stripped_name = name[:name.rfind(' via ')].strip().strip("'")
> +
> +    original_from = clean_header(mail.get('X-Original-From', ''))
> +    if original_from:
> +        new_email = split_from_header(original_from)[1].strip()[:255]
> +        return (stripped_name, new_email)
> +
> +    addrs = []
> +    reply_to_headers = mail.get_all('Reply-To') or []
> +    cc_headers = mail.get_all('Cc') or []
> +    for header in reply_to_headers + cc_headers:
> +        header = clean_header(header)
> +        addrs = header.split(",")
> +        for addr in addrs:
> +            new_name, new_email = split_from_header(addr)
> +            if new_name:
> +                new_name = new_name.strip()[:255]
> +            if new_email:
> +                new_email = new_email.strip()[:255]
> +            if new_name == stripped_name:
> +                return (stripped_name, new_email)
> +
> +    # If we can't figure out the original sender, just keep it as is
> +    return (name, email)
> +
> +
> +def get_or_create_author(mail, project=None):
> +    from_header = clean_header(mail.get('From'))
> +
> +    if not from_header:
> +        raise ValueError("Invalid 'From' header")
> +
> +    name, email = split_from_header(from_header)
> +
>      if not email:
>          raise ValueError("Invalid 'From' header")
>  
> @@ -362,6 +416,9 @@ def get_or_create_author(mail):
>      if name is not None:
>          name = name.strip()[:255]
>  
> +    if project and email.lower() == project.listemail.lower():
> +        name, email = get_original_sender(mail, name, email)
> +
>      # this correctly handles the case where we lose the race to create
>      # the person and another process beats us to it. (If the record
>      # does not exist, g_o_c invokes _create_object_from_params which
> @@ -1004,7 +1061,7 @@ def parse_mail(mail, list_id=None):
>  
>      if not is_comment and (diff or pull_url):  # patches or pull requests
>          # we delay the saving until we know we have a patch.
> -        author = get_or_create_author(mail)
> +        author = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>  
>          delegate = find_delegate_by_header(mail)
>          if not delegate and diff:
> @@ -1099,7 +1156,7 @@ def parse_mail(mail, list_id=None):
>                  is_cover_letter = True
>  
>          if is_cover_letter:
> -            author = get_or_create_author(mail)
> +            author = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>  
>              # we don't use 'find_series' here as a cover letter will
>              # always be the first item in a thread, thus the references
> @@ -1159,7 +1216,7 @@ def parse_mail(mail, list_id=None):
>      if not submission:
>          return
>  
> -    author = get_or_create_author(mail)
> +    author = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>  
>      try:
>          comment = Comment.objects.create(
> diff --git a/patchwork/tests/test_mboxviews.py b/patchwork/tests/test_mboxviews.py
> index 3854a856c4db..8f67778dbacb 100644
> --- a/patchwork/tests/test_mboxviews.py
> +++ b/patchwork/tests/test_mboxviews.py
> @@ -183,6 +183,27 @@ class MboxHeaderTest(TestCase):
>                                          patch.url_msgid]))
>          self.assertContains(response, from_email)
>  
> +    def test_dmarc_from_header(self):
> +        """Validate 'From' header is rewritten correctly when DMARC-munged.
> +
> +        Test that when an email with a DMARC-munged From header is processed,
> +        the From header will be unmunged and the munged address will be saved
> +        as 'X-Patchwork-Original-From'.
> +        """
> +        orig_from_header = 'Person via List <list@example.com>'
> +        rewritten_from_header = 'Person <person@example.com>'
> +        project = create_project(listemail='list@example.com')
> +        person = create_person(name='Person', email='person@example.com')
> +        patch = create_patch(project=project,
> +                             headers='From: ' + orig_from_header,
> +                             submitter=person)
> +        response = self.client.get(
> +            reverse('patch-mbox', args=[patch.project.linkname,
> +                                        patch.url_msgid]))
> +        mail = email.message_from_string(response.content.decode())
> +        self.assertEqual(mail['From'], rewritten_from_header)
> +        self.assertEqual(mail['X-Patchwork-Original-From'], orig_from_header)
> +
>      def test_date_header(self):
>          patch = create_patch()
>          response = self.client.get(
> diff --git a/patchwork/tests/test_parser.py b/patchwork/tests/test_parser.py
> index e5a2fca3044e..85c6c52f0e4b 100644
> --- a/patchwork/tests/test_parser.py
> +++ b/patchwork/tests/test_parser.py
> @@ -265,11 +265,23 @@ class SenderCorrelationTest(TestCase):
>      """
>  
>      @staticmethod
> -    def _create_email(from_header):
> +    def _create_email(from_header, reply_tos=None, ccs=None,
> +                      x_original_from=None):
>          mail = 'Message-Id: %s\n' % make_msgid() + \
> -               'From: %s\n' % from_header + \
> -               'Subject: Tests\n\n'\
> -               'test\n'
> +               'From: %s\n' % from_header
> +
> +        if reply_tos:
> +            mail += 'Reply-To: %s\n' % ', '.join(reply_tos)
> +
> +        if ccs:
> +            mail += 'Cc: %s\n' % ', '.join(ccs)
> +
> +        if x_original_from:
> +            mail += 'X-Original-From: %s\n' % x_original_from
> +
> +        mail += 'Subject: Tests\n\n'\
> +            'test\n'
> +
>          return message_from_string(mail)
>  
>      def test_existing_sender(self):
> @@ -311,6 +323,54 @@ class SenderCorrelationTest(TestCase):
>          self.assertEqual(person_b._state.adding, False)
>          self.assertEqual(person_b.id, person_a.id)
>  
> +    def test_mailman_dmarc_munging(self):
> +        project = create_project()
> +        real_sender = 'Existing Sender <existing@example.com>'
> +        munged_sender = 'Existing Sender via List <{}>'.format(
> +            project.listemail)
> +        other_email = 'Other Person <other@example.com>'
> +
> +        # Unmunged author
> +        mail = self._create_email(real_sender)
> +        person_a = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
> +        person_a.save()
> +
> +        # Single Reply-To
> +        mail = self._create_email(munged_sender, [real_sender])
> +        person_b = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
> +        self.assertEqual(person_b._state.adding, False)
> +        self.assertEqual(person_b.id, person_a.id)
> +
> +        # Single Cc
> +        mail = self._create_email(munged_sender, [], [real_sender])
> +        person_b = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
> +        self.assertEqual(person_b._state.adding, False)
> +        self.assertEqual(person_b.id, person_a.id)
> +
> +        # Multiple Reply-Tos and Ccs
> +        mail = self._create_email(munged_sender, [other_email, real_sender],
> +                                  [other_email, other_email])
> +        person_b = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
> +        self.assertEqual(person_b._state.adding, False)
> +        self.assertEqual(person_b.id, person_a.id)
> +
> +    def test_google_dmarc_munging(self):
> +        project = create_project()
> +        real_sender = 'Existing Sender <existing@example.com>'
> +        munged_sender = "'Existing Sender' via List <{}>".format(
> +            project.listemail)
> +
> +        # Unmunged author
> +        mail = self._create_email(real_sender)
> +        person_a = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
> +        person_a.save()
> +
> +        # X-Original-From header
> +        mail = self._create_email(munged_sender, None, None, real_sender)
> +        person_b = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
> +        self.assertEqual(person_b._state.adding, False)
> +        self.assertEqual(person_b.id, person_a.id)
> +
>  
>  class SeriesCorrelationTest(TestCase):
>      """Validate correct behavior of find_series."""
> diff --git a/patchwork/views/utils.py b/patchwork/views/utils.py
> index d65aa5816336..905807935459 100644
> --- a/patchwork/views/utils.py
> +++ b/patchwork/views/utils.py
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ from django.utils import six
>  
>  from patchwork.models import Comment
>  from patchwork.models import Patch
> +from patchwork.parser import split_from_header
>  
>  if settings.ENABLE_REST_API:
>      from rest_framework.authtoken.models import Token
> @@ -92,6 +93,17 @@ def _submission_to_mbox(submission):
>          # [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1847
>          if key == 'Content-Type' and val == 'multipart/signed':
>              continue
> +
> +        if key == 'From':
> +            name, addr = split_from_header(val)
> +            if addr == submission.project.listemail:
> +                # If From: is the list address (typically DMARC munging), then
> +                # use the submitter details (which are cleaned up in the
> +                # parser) in the From: field so that the patch author details
> +                # are correct when applied with git am.
> +                mail['X-Patchwork-Original-From'] = val
> +                val = mail['X-Patchwork-Submitter']
> +
>          mail[key] = val
>  
>      if 'Date' not in mail:
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Patchwork mailing list
> Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork

On 18/10/19 3:06 pm, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> I'll apply it shortly to master. You could convince me to get it
> backported to stable if you really wanted.
> 
> Do we need something to go through the db and fix up old ones? Or is it
> best to let sleeping patches lie?
Personally I was thinking we should leave previous patches as-is, it 
seems like a fair bit of extra code for fairly small gain.

On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 15:16 +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 18/10/19 3:06 pm, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> > I'll apply it shortly to master. You could convince me to get it
> > backported to stable if you really wanted.
> > 
> > Do we need something to go through the db and fix up old ones? Or is it
> > best to let sleeping patches lie?
>
> Personally I was thinking we should leave previous patches as-is, it 
> seems like a fair bit of extra code for fairly small gain.

Agreed. It would be a large data migration that I'd rather not have to
do. If people really care, they can probably produce a script to run
via 'manage.py (db)shell' to fix these up manually or we can fix
ourselves later.

Stephen

Applied with a release note.

Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> writes:

> Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> To avoid triggering spam filters due to failed signature validation, many
>> mailing lists mangle the From header to change the From address to be the
>> address of the list, typically where the sender's domain has a strict DMARC
>> policy enabled.
>>
>> In this case, we should try to unmangle the From header.
>>
>> Add support for using the X-Original-From or Reply-To headers, as used by
>> Google Groups and Mailman respectively, to unmangle the From header when
>> necessary and associate the patch with the correct submitter based on the
>> unmangled email address.
>>
>> When downloading mboxes, rewrite the From header using the unmangled
>> address, and preserve the original header as X-Patchwork-Original-From in
>> case someone needs it for some reason. The original From header will still
>> be stored in the database and exposed via the API, as we want to keep
>> messages as close to the original received format as possible.
>>
>> Closes: #64 ("Incorrect submitter when using googlegroups")
>> Reported-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
>> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Tested-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> # mailman only
>
> I'll apply it shortly to master. You could convince me to get it
> backported to stable if you really wanted.
>
> Do we need something to go through the db and fix up old ones? Or is it
> best to let sleeping patches lie?
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>>
>> ---
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> - use X-Original-From rather than X-Original-Sender
>> - unmangle From header when downloading mbox
>>
>> rewrite from header
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> use x original from
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  patchwork/parser.py               | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  patchwork/tests/test_mboxviews.py | 21 +++++++++
>>  patchwork/tests/test_parser.py    | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  patchwork/views/utils.py          | 12 +++++
>>  4 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/patchwork/parser.py b/patchwork/parser.py
>> index 7dc66bc05a5b..be1e51652dd3 100644
>> --- a/patchwork/parser.py
>> +++ b/patchwork/parser.py
>> @@ -321,12 +321,7 @@ def find_series(project, mail, author):
>>      return _find_series_by_markers(project, mail, author)
>>  
>>  
>> -def get_or_create_author(mail):
>> -    from_header = clean_header(mail.get('From'))
>> -
>> -    if not from_header:
>> -        raise ValueError("Invalid 'From' header")
>> -
>> +def split_from_header(from_header):
>>      name, email = (None, None)
>>  
>>      # tuple of (regex, fn)
>> @@ -355,6 +350,65 @@ def get_or_create_author(mail):
>>              (name, email) = fn(match.groups())
>>              break
>>  
>> +    return (name, email)
>> +
>> +
>> +# Unmangle From addresses that have been mangled for DMARC purposes.
>> +#
>> +# To avoid triggering spam filters due to failed signature validation, many
>> +# mailing lists mangle the From header to change the From address to be the
>> +# address of the list, typically where the sender's domain has a strict
>> +# DMARC policy enabled.
>> +#
>> +# Unfortunately, there's no standardised way of preserving the original
>> +# From address.
>> +#
>> +# Google Groups adds an X-Original-From header. If present, we use that.
>> +#
>> +# Mailman preserves the original address by adding a Reply-To, except in the
>> +# case where the list is set to either reply to list, or reply to a specific
>> +# address, in which case the original From is added to Cc instead. These corner
>> +# cases are dumb, but we try and handle things as sensibly as possible by
>> +# looking for a name in Reply-To/Cc that matches From. It's inexact but should
>> +# be good enough for our purposes.
>> +def get_original_sender(mail, name, email):
>> +    if name and ' via ' in name:
>> +        # Mailman uses the format "<name> via <list>"
>> +        # Google Groups uses "'<name>' via <list>"
>> +        stripped_name = name[:name.rfind(' via ')].strip().strip("'")
>> +
>> +    original_from = clean_header(mail.get('X-Original-From', ''))
>> +    if original_from:
>> +        new_email = split_from_header(original_from)[1].strip()[:255]
>> +        return (stripped_name, new_email)
>> +
>> +    addrs = []
>> +    reply_to_headers = mail.get_all('Reply-To') or []
>> +    cc_headers = mail.get_all('Cc') or []
>> +    for header in reply_to_headers + cc_headers:
>> +        header = clean_header(header)
>> +        addrs = header.split(",")
>> +        for addr in addrs:
>> +            new_name, new_email = split_from_header(addr)
>> +            if new_name:
>> +                new_name = new_name.strip()[:255]
>> +            if new_email:
>> +                new_email = new_email.strip()[:255]
>> +            if new_name == stripped_name:
>> +                return (stripped_name, new_email)
>> +
>> +    # If we can't figure out the original sender, just keep it as is
>> +    return (name, email)
>> +
>> +
>> +def get_or_create_author(mail, project=None):
>> +    from_header = clean_header(mail.get('From'))
>> +
>> +    if not from_header:
>> +        raise ValueError("Invalid 'From' header")
>> +
>> +    name, email = split_from_header(from_header)
>> +
>>      if not email:
>>          raise ValueError("Invalid 'From' header")
>>  
>> @@ -362,6 +416,9 @@ def get_or_create_author(mail):
>>      if name is not None:
>>          name = name.strip()[:255]
>>  
>> +    if project and email.lower() == project.listemail.lower():
>> +        name, email = get_original_sender(mail, name, email)
>> +
>>      # this correctly handles the case where we lose the race to create
>>      # the person and another process beats us to it. (If the record
>>      # does not exist, g_o_c invokes _create_object_from_params which
>> @@ -1004,7 +1061,7 @@ def parse_mail(mail, list_id=None):
>>  
>>      if not is_comment and (diff or pull_url):  # patches or pull requests
>>          # we delay the saving until we know we have a patch.
>> -        author = get_or_create_author(mail)
>> +        author = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>>  
>>          delegate = find_delegate_by_header(mail)
>>          if not delegate and diff:
>> @@ -1099,7 +1156,7 @@ def parse_mail(mail, list_id=None):
>>                  is_cover_letter = True
>>  
>>          if is_cover_letter:
>> -            author = get_or_create_author(mail)
>> +            author = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>>  
>>              # we don't use 'find_series' here as a cover letter will
>>              # always be the first item in a thread, thus the references
>> @@ -1159,7 +1216,7 @@ def parse_mail(mail, list_id=None):
>>      if not submission:
>>          return
>>  
>> -    author = get_or_create_author(mail)
>> +    author = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>>  
>>      try:
>>          comment = Comment.objects.create(
>> diff --git a/patchwork/tests/test_mboxviews.py b/patchwork/tests/test_mboxviews.py
>> index 3854a856c4db..8f67778dbacb 100644
>> --- a/patchwork/tests/test_mboxviews.py
>> +++ b/patchwork/tests/test_mboxviews.py
>> @@ -183,6 +183,27 @@ class MboxHeaderTest(TestCase):
>>                                          patch.url_msgid]))
>>          self.assertContains(response, from_email)
>>  
>> +    def test_dmarc_from_header(self):
>> +        """Validate 'From' header is rewritten correctly when DMARC-munged.
>> +
>> +        Test that when an email with a DMARC-munged From header is processed,
>> +        the From header will be unmunged and the munged address will be saved
>> +        as 'X-Patchwork-Original-From'.
>> +        """
>> +        orig_from_header = 'Person via List <list@example.com>'
>> +        rewritten_from_header = 'Person <person@example.com>'
>> +        project = create_project(listemail='list@example.com')
>> +        person = create_person(name='Person', email='person@example.com')
>> +        patch = create_patch(project=project,
>> +                             headers='From: ' + orig_from_header,
>> +                             submitter=person)
>> +        response = self.client.get(
>> +            reverse('patch-mbox', args=[patch.project.linkname,
>> +                                        patch.url_msgid]))
>> +        mail = email.message_from_string(response.content.decode())
>> +        self.assertEqual(mail['From'], rewritten_from_header)
>> +        self.assertEqual(mail['X-Patchwork-Original-From'], orig_from_header)
>> +
>>      def test_date_header(self):
>>          patch = create_patch()
>>          response = self.client.get(
>> diff --git a/patchwork/tests/test_parser.py b/patchwork/tests/test_parser.py
>> index e5a2fca3044e..85c6c52f0e4b 100644
>> --- a/patchwork/tests/test_parser.py
>> +++ b/patchwork/tests/test_parser.py
>> @@ -265,11 +265,23 @@ class SenderCorrelationTest(TestCase):
>>      """
>>  
>>      @staticmethod
>> -    def _create_email(from_header):
>> +    def _create_email(from_header, reply_tos=None, ccs=None,
>> +                      x_original_from=None):
>>          mail = 'Message-Id: %s\n' % make_msgid() + \
>> -               'From: %s\n' % from_header + \
>> -               'Subject: Tests\n\n'\
>> -               'test\n'
>> +               'From: %s\n' % from_header
>> +
>> +        if reply_tos:
>> +            mail += 'Reply-To: %s\n' % ', '.join(reply_tos)
>> +
>> +        if ccs:
>> +            mail += 'Cc: %s\n' % ', '.join(ccs)
>> +
>> +        if x_original_from:
>> +            mail += 'X-Original-From: %s\n' % x_original_from
>> +
>> +        mail += 'Subject: Tests\n\n'\
>> +            'test\n'
>> +
>>          return message_from_string(mail)
>>  
>>      def test_existing_sender(self):
>> @@ -311,6 +323,54 @@ class SenderCorrelationTest(TestCase):
>>          self.assertEqual(person_b._state.adding, False)
>>          self.assertEqual(person_b.id, person_a.id)
>>  
>> +    def test_mailman_dmarc_munging(self):
>> +        project = create_project()
>> +        real_sender = 'Existing Sender <existing@example.com>'
>> +        munged_sender = 'Existing Sender via List <{}>'.format(
>> +            project.listemail)
>> +        other_email = 'Other Person <other@example.com>'
>> +
>> +        # Unmunged author
>> +        mail = self._create_email(real_sender)
>> +        person_a = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>> +        person_a.save()
>> +
>> +        # Single Reply-To
>> +        mail = self._create_email(munged_sender, [real_sender])
>> +        person_b = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>> +        self.assertEqual(person_b._state.adding, False)
>> +        self.assertEqual(person_b.id, person_a.id)
>> +
>> +        # Single Cc
>> +        mail = self._create_email(munged_sender, [], [real_sender])
>> +        person_b = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>> +        self.assertEqual(person_b._state.adding, False)
>> +        self.assertEqual(person_b.id, person_a.id)
>> +
>> +        # Multiple Reply-Tos and Ccs
>> +        mail = self._create_email(munged_sender, [other_email, real_sender],
>> +                                  [other_email, other_email])
>> +        person_b = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>> +        self.assertEqual(person_b._state.adding, False)
>> +        self.assertEqual(person_b.id, person_a.id)
>> +
>> +    def test_google_dmarc_munging(self):
>> +        project = create_project()
>> +        real_sender = 'Existing Sender <existing@example.com>'
>> +        munged_sender = "'Existing Sender' via List <{}>".format(
>> +            project.listemail)
>> +
>> +        # Unmunged author
>> +        mail = self._create_email(real_sender)
>> +        person_a = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>> +        person_a.save()
>> +
>> +        # X-Original-From header
>> +        mail = self._create_email(munged_sender, None, None, real_sender)
>> +        person_b = get_or_create_author(mail, project)
>> +        self.assertEqual(person_b._state.adding, False)
>> +        self.assertEqual(person_b.id, person_a.id)
>> +
>>  
>>  class SeriesCorrelationTest(TestCase):
>>      """Validate correct behavior of find_series."""
>> diff --git a/patchwork/views/utils.py b/patchwork/views/utils.py
>> index d65aa5816336..905807935459 100644
>> --- a/patchwork/views/utils.py
>> +++ b/patchwork/views/utils.py
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ from django.utils import six
>>  
>>  from patchwork.models import Comment
>>  from patchwork.models import Patch
>> +from patchwork.parser import split_from_header
>>  
>>  if settings.ENABLE_REST_API:
>>      from rest_framework.authtoken.models import Token
>> @@ -92,6 +93,17 @@ def _submission_to_mbox(submission):
>>          # [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1847
>>          if key == 'Content-Type' and val == 'multipart/signed':
>>              continue
>> +
>> +        if key == 'From':
>> +            name, addr = split_from_header(val)
>> +            if addr == submission.project.listemail:
>> +                # If From: is the list address (typically DMARC munging), then
>> +                # use the submitter details (which are cleaned up in the
>> +                # parser) in the From: field so that the patch author details
>> +                # are correct when applied with git am.
>> +                mail['X-Patchwork-Original-From'] = val
>> +                val = mail['X-Patchwork-Submitter']
>> +
>>          mail[key] = val
>>  
>>      if 'Date' not in mail:
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Patchwork mailing list
>> Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork