Message ID | 20190903221018.3050-1-jpettit@ovn.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | [ovs-dev,branch-2.11,1/2] Set release date for 2.11.2. | expand |
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 03:10:17PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote: > Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpettit@ovn.org> > --- To the set Acked-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:10 PM Justin Pettit <jpettit@ovn.org> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpettit@ovn.org> > --- > NEWS | 3 ++- > debian/changelog | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS > index ff2647739375..f2d44e4630bb 100644 > --- a/NEWS > +++ b/NEWS > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > -v2.11.2 - xx xxx xxxx > +v2.11.2 - 03 Sep 2019 > -------------------- > + - Bug fixes > - DPDK > * OVS validated with DPDK 18.11.2 which is recommended to be used. > > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > index 1c3f40bad58d..25763e831b68 100644 > --- a/debian/changelog > +++ b/debian/changelog > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ openvswitch (2.11.2-1) unstable; urgency=low > [ Open vSwitch team ] > * New upstream version > > - -- Open vSwitch team <dev@openvswitch.org> Sat, 30 Mar 2019 10:46:10 -0700 > + -- Open vSwitch team <dev@openvswitch.org> Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:05:42 -0700 > > openvswitch (2.11.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > [ Open vSwitch team ] > -- > 2.17.1 > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev Hi Justin, Shall older branches support latest kernels? If so, some kernel patches need to be backported to avoid compile failure. For example, on 2.11, below patch is required for kernel module compile to pass on Ubuntu with kernel version 4.15.0-60: - datapath: Use new header file net/ipv6_frag.h For the above patch to be backported without conflict, it requires: - datapath: Pass nf_hook_state to nf_conntrack_in() - datapath: Handle removal of nf_conntrack_l3proto.h - datapath: Fix compiling error for 4.14.111+ kernel - datapath: meter: Use struct_size() in kzalloc() Thanks, Han
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 4:08 PM, Han Zhou <zhouhan@gmail.com> wrote: > > Shall older branches support latest kernels? If so, some kernel patches need to be backported to avoid compile failure. For example, on 2.11, below patch is required for kernel module compile to pass on Ubuntu with kernel version 4.15.0-60: > - datapath: Use new header file net/ipv6_frag.h > > For the above patch to be backported without conflict, it requires: > - datapath: Pass nf_hook_state to nf_conntrack_in() > - datapath: Handle removal of nf_conntrack_l3proto.h > - datapath: Fix compiling error for 4.14.111+ kernel > - datapath: meter: Use struct_size() in kzalloc() We support the kernels listed in our releases FAQ for a particular OVS version: http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/faq/releases/ 2.11 does indicate that kernel 4.15 should be supported. It looks like OVS compiles fine against 4.15.0-58, but something changed in 4.15.0-60. I went ahead and pulled the patches you recommended and pushed them to branch-2.11. Thanks for figuring it out. I'll skip the 2.11.2 release announcement and just jump to 2.11.3. Thanks again! --Justin
Hi Justin: Please back-port the above patches to branch-2.10 too as it fails there too. On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:24 PM Justin Pettit <jpettit@ovn.org> wrote: > > > On Sep 5, 2019, at 4:08 PM, Han Zhou <zhouhan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Shall older branches support latest kernels? If so, some kernel patches > need to be backported to avoid compile failure. For example, on 2.11, below > patch is required for kernel module compile to pass on Ubuntu with kernel > version 4.15.0-60: > > - datapath: Use new header file net/ipv6_frag.h > > > > For the above patch to be backported without conflict, it requires: > > - datapath: Pass nf_hook_state to nf_conntrack_in() > > - datapath: Handle removal of nf_conntrack_l3proto.h > > - datapath: Fix compiling error for 4.14.111+ kernel > > - datapath: meter: Use struct_size() in kzalloc() > > We support the kernels listed in our releases FAQ for a particular OVS > version: > > http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/faq/releases/ > > 2.11 does indicate that kernel 4.15 should be supported. It looks like > OVS compiles fine against 4.15.0-58, but something changed in 4.15.0-60. I > went ahead and pulled the patches you recommended and pushed them to > branch-2.11. Thanks for figuring it out. > > I'll skip the 2.11.2 release announcement and just jump to 2.11.3. > > Thanks again! > > --Justin > > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev >
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 4:40 PM, aginwala <aginwala@asu.edu> wrote: > > Hi Justin: > > Please back-port the above patches to branch-2.10 too as it fails there too. Done. Thanks. --Justin
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index ff2647739375..f2d44e4630bb 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ -v2.11.2 - xx xxx xxxx +v2.11.2 - 03 Sep 2019 -------------------- + - Bug fixes - DPDK * OVS validated with DPDK 18.11.2 which is recommended to be used. diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 1c3f40bad58d..25763e831b68 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ openvswitch (2.11.2-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Open vSwitch team ] * New upstream version - -- Open vSwitch team <dev@openvswitch.org> Sat, 30 Mar 2019 10:46:10 -0700 + -- Open vSwitch team <dev@openvswitch.org> Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:05:42 -0700 openvswitch (2.11.1-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Open vSwitch team ]
Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpettit@ovn.org> --- NEWS | 3 ++- debian/changelog | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)