@@ -5909,7 +5909,7 @@ static int nft_setelem_parse_flags(const struct nft_set *set,
return 0;
}
-static int nft_setelem_parse_key(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
+static int nft_setelem_parse_key(struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_set *set,
struct nft_data *key, struct nlattr *attr)
{
struct nft_data_desc desc = {
@@ -5962,7 +5962,7 @@ static void *nft_setelem_catchall_get(const struct net *net,
return priv;
}
-static int nft_setelem_get(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
+static int nft_setelem_get(struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_set *set,
struct nft_set_elem *elem, u32 flags)
{
void *priv;
@@ -5981,7 +5981,7 @@ static int nft_setelem_get(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
return 0;
}
-static int nft_get_set_elem(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
+static int nft_get_set_elem(struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_set *set,
const struct nlattr *attr, bool reset)
{
struct nlattr *nla[NFTA_SET_ELEM_MAX + 1];
The function is not supposed to alter the set, passing the pointer as const is fine and merely requires to adjust signatures of two called functions as well. Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)