From patchwork Tue Nov 17 08:26:38 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= X-Patchwork-Id: 1401414 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=23.128.96.18; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=Vl4FdewX; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CZzZb5pRcz9sT6 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:27:19 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727193AbgKQI1K (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:27:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42270 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726982AbgKQI1K (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:27:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A646C0613CF; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id oc3so43505pjb.4; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0w+Bq27/X0GIM1BI/NmY3YCnW8k8aSVxxtLiS5VSHa4=; b=Vl4FdewX3/qjsY+5i8oCei0lR1IhFvHmLxRKBQdOvYK/A1LBq73lxnEW0aMdhSRyhQ ZJXTzWbPyGQAu5e7eb9LyiymBuZ5rFVqzyH5FGaW7M/3YWhcbR+QmseDLrmtqkKA+MAf jbzI7OIews82d9lXzcAlpOLksHU2A1qs8twFVSwmnVNDjHYtfN1cb2kAiuDKYgGjDRMg aDulsNkjtPjIPtNN0dhcd2A+91OlcbWcQqgjTUxeJvN5GdyLSG4uXiCK1k3YLYDHiYTo x+MCXum3b/tKQhXSxF/0EMuy9j0joq0dbI5ramufU7hNvD1NGgaUqUP8kBu5oGM5KpnA EDFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0w+Bq27/X0GIM1BI/NmY3YCnW8k8aSVxxtLiS5VSHa4=; b=AW6eIh77HoCqScfG9lNhgSOMqbdpVR3ihJxlpLeMVYe1/0wS2S/uCTT/dPhcQWQxNS ipxsFERTJaAJI3vltNmbjs/DfS6JYrTs47KaAl8T65IuntZc+PocSQ9m+/UwD1C+OQaR SAvCRKrA2TLq5KBsANe21JN20/FIJ9Qp/3KfItdyC1QVNo7zSFdO49WrPXEouT8EVfsc l/ZpjLzKBCdkysbt5IlSqthYgM5xghPw8WvMIyQ3oOZp+xkjj0YyPgfoWOQDQRT3253V sgXbJxd+TZ8mOmtqxVf08oE1/PCy/n52deVf/U8Ccxd0MhSWyXLAmvgP+gepC/MZZGpX r48A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531mh17jCi3QMadDXCaDRYclCUqWwQ2GkewBzFJ2hVWV5vSdiktP hIKhFCIEryARyTgzYEtnTes= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfa0OkA1HWcJiLXPFp5EdZ5ns95AOY+lu07uAWijQqDgGlmiHAiCac0tIGDqtfSe7yIGujKQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3506:: with SMTP id ls6mr3424114pjb.202.1605601629510; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from btopel-mobl.ger.intel.com ([192.55.54.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c12sm2251671pjs.8.2020.11.17.00.27.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:08 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , xi.wang@gmail.com, luke.r.nels@gmail.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Mark tests that require unaligned memory access Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:26:38 +0100 Message-Id: <20201117082638.43675-4-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20201117082638.43675-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> References: <20201117082638.43675-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org A lot of tests require unaligned memory access to work. Mark the tests as such, so that they can be avoided on unsupported architectures such as RISC-V. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel --- .../selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c | 7 +++ .../bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c | 3 ++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c | 4 ++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c | 8 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c | 46 +++++++++++-------- 7 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c index 2ad5f974451c..fb13ca2d5606 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup remote_ip4 field", @@ -292,6 +293,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup remote_port field", @@ -305,6 +307,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup local_ip4 field", @@ -331,6 +334,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup local_port field", @@ -344,6 +348,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, /* invalid 1,2,4-byte reads from 8-byte fields in bpf_sk_lookup */ { @@ -410,6 +415,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 4-byte unaligned read from bpf_sk_lookup at even offset", @@ -422,6 +428,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, /* in-bound and out-of-bound writes to bpf_sk_lookup */ { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c index 988f46a1a4c7..c0648dc009b5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the allowed memory range", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct map access, write test 7", @@ -195,6 +196,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1, 3 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=47 size=2", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct map access, write test 17", @@ -209,6 +211,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1, 3 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=47 size=2", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct map access, write test 18", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c index 637f9293bda8..b117bdd3806d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ .errstr_unpriv = "bpf_array access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN", .result = REJECT, .errstr = "cannot access ptr member ops with moff 0 in struct bpf_map with off 1 size 4", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c index 95b5d70a1dc1..2978fb5a769d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c @@ -31,4 +31,5 @@ .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 1, }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE, .errstr = "R6 invalid variable buffer offset: off=0, var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c index 006b5bd99c08..3b6ee009c00b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c @@ -675,6 +675,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_sk_fullsock() after release", @@ -698,6 +699,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_sk_fullsock(tp) after release", @@ -725,6 +727,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use sk after bpf_sk_release(tp)", @@ -747,6 +750,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_get_listener_sock() after bpf_sk_release(sk)", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c index 4ad7e05de706..bb0dd89dd212 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc negative", @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc src_reg negative", @@ -97,6 +99,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=44 size=8", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc and spill", @@ -126,6 +129,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc and spill negative", @@ -156,6 +160,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=48 size=8", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc three regs", @@ -182,6 +187,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc after call", @@ -210,6 +216,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc in callee", @@ -240,6 +247,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc, spill, JEQ", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c index ccade9312d21..55af248efa93 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(field, off, res, err) \ +#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(field, off, res, err, flgs) \ { \ "wide store to bpf_sock_addr." #field "[" #off "]", \ .insns = { \ @@ -11,31 +11,36 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, \ .expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, \ .errstr = err, \ + .flags = flgs, \ } /* user_ip6[0] is u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 0, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 1, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 2, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), /* msg_src_ip6[0] is _not_ u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 0, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 1, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 2, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8", 0), #undef BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE -#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(field, off, res, err) \ +#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(field, off, res, err, flgs) \ { \ "wide load from bpf_sock_addr." #field "[" #off "]", \ .insns = { \ @@ -48,26 +53,31 @@ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, \ .expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, \ .errstr = err, \ + .flags = flgs, \ } /* user_ip6[0] is u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 0, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 1, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 2, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), /* msg_src_ip6[0] is _not_ u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 0, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 1, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 2, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8", 0), #undef BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD