| Message ID | 20201116101633.64627-1-wanghai38@huawei.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [bpf] selftests/bpf: fix error return code in run_getsockopt_test() | expand |
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (refs/heads/master): On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:16:33 +0800 you wrote: > Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling > case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function. > > Fixes: 65b4414a05eb ("selftests/bpf: add sockopt test that exercises BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI") > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf] selftests/bpf: fix error return code in run_getsockopt_test() https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/2acc3c1bc8e9 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_multi.c index 29188d6f5c8d..51fac975b316 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_multi.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_multi.c @@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ static int run_getsockopt_test(struct bpf_object *obj, int cg_parent, */ buf = 0x40; - if (setsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_IP, IP_TOS, &buf, 1) < 0) { + err = setsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_IP, IP_TOS, &buf, 1); + if (err < 0) { log_err("Failed to call setsockopt(IP_TOS)"); goto detach; }
Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function. Fixes: 65b4414a05eb ("selftests/bpf: add sockopt test that exercises BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_multi.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)