From patchwork Tue Dec 17 16:15:37 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsO0bWUgUG91aWxsZXI=?= X-Patchwork-Id: 1211499 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=silabs.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=silabs.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@silabs.onmicrosoft.com header.b="RUPq28xO"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47cjtz08Ckz9sSQ for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 03:16:27 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729248AbfLQQQP (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:16:15 -0500 Received: from mail-dm6nam12on2072.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.243.72]:33729 "EHLO NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729202AbfLQQQN (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:16:13 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=JL6Z45X94EGcko5cVf3JA5YWXLPmSIEUAjDxn1RQJQvCJaBOCpAvfoHVJwkqtlNUa2QsZD5WoRTrYFax7EHlCkjrag0dZmFvnBjjuqjNC48agJZjhBCAsUaDAqjDolT6jtb2RjDjgbSFJE9zhKPK7SP2P8Ooqp+eE5C/PokQ//Hy+Eh7qpq04ZOePJC0KzVownQSgJog6eFL8X19MDJsMnnDMpDs/NM1Ls69z/D9+laj7HQ20+1MgVZjfRJvSX/D8yKd73tOdEOjZCPQ7A39RWW9nedICJJ2bihIxhqFPo2t0NB7fsJHiqZzhGVrBBcMBIU28Q7jGu1bkwR0AOwYtQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8yPmS4H5E8JPUG3xYt17LIXx6rW02POsO+7NNwVhTFw=; b=R3T6Lr7Y4nAcAMryfwKH6ECcraYLV4eIHHdMsmp8wA89WfqXXY2Tg5rbeZa5ynjRZIxVelWbDbD2MMWsN5EQ3/z3ySm8cffcAYkef2D+Z6ijZUTYVWqR9aWFBpUq1T3f460r7ZR1ROlAjK/wGvesVM7Z4jqX2dxME5s+tk6Un8nyKMtZDBXsLe8iel1ldSih/fSHwCw+3HoxBUr1G6u1ISWvhW40gxTWvWHOIK+3gCBAVVDl651NGmaH3yKPc1z68D6I008wzsfNw2RryWtTsbs7tKq4TrU5oRMYnKu4jYBizbXRn3+9I2dLnHilJM3fMkQP98x9sCna4pB/tG4evg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=silabs.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=silabs.com; dkim=pass header.d=silabs.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=silabs.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-silabs-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8yPmS4H5E8JPUG3xYt17LIXx6rW02POsO+7NNwVhTFw=; b=RUPq28xOEwfZdaYnkfsnrXs4EM8w/5ojfZ/NsuvKaCl5QVqQMCOZ9Te4H+QtoFzo/erZxpJbXAEgxttllHY7dvfZ0CNyt5nDzlNkym+T+h3ZjrQ440xUBW71Yz3P9dePGC2EPQVIqfya5eNt4OxGb7m5PHKOz1Q3luxcJEgxIf0= Received: from MN2PR11MB4063.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.180.22) by MN2PR11MB4477.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.36.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2538.17; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:16:02 +0000 Received: from MN2PR11MB4063.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f46c:e5b4:2a85:f0bf]) by MN2PR11MB4063.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f46c:e5b4:2a85:f0bf%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2538.019; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:16:02 +0000 From: =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsO0bWUgUG91aWxsZXI=?= To: "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" CC: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kalle Valo , "David S . Miller" , =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsO0bWUgUG91?= =?utf-8?q?iller?= Subject: [PATCH v2 51/55] staging: wfx: workaround bug with "iw scan" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 51/55] staging: wfx: workaround bug with "iw scan" Thread-Index: AQHVtPU3xiUk2oUs3kW8So34MmM/rw== Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:15:37 +0000 Message-ID: <20191217161318.31402-52-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com> References: <20191217161318.31402-1-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com> In-Reply-To: <20191217161318.31402-1-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: PR0P264CA0174.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:100:1c::18) To MN2PR11MB4063.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:13f::22) authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-mailer: git-send-email 2.24.0 x-originating-ip: [37.71.187.125] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a4a51ef6-660b-465b-2e3b-08d7830c5a19 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4477: x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:4502; x-forefront-prvs: 02543CD7CD x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(366004)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(1076003)(66574012)(186003)(107886003)(8676002)(6506007)(86362001)(478600001)(85182001)(5660300002)(81156014)(26005)(4326008)(6486002)(8936002)(316002)(110136005)(54906003)(64756008)(66446008)(66946007)(2616005)(66556008)(66476007)(85202003)(36756003)(6512007)(2906002)(52116002)(6666004)(71200400001)(81166006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4477; H:MN2PR11MB4063.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: silabs.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: SF/NnugUPFTBKeG4nBwzp1WqK+3K4OO+tCggqf4zo/I/RZaF2xI2OppESwktTV/rnL1SK5yxc6hdfEsKKQFObZyR0/HynQJk3ZGLf93esCFUxq+FE5U6qPzaFAUxt87m1tSVrZ6RTQkc7orYO1FktiTFWrI1d9+jUo+U+/ukzRfTwGwGxek/7FgZYM/zLLc4NjbtCo8u9V9U2THTykoy8EfmqtzJTjKK7HEQEpowsH0u0I4q7VoIq4RNBprrRsZXqkPGaLDlzAto255CVJ9LFYCqj84bJfOP3zsHO40T02UWS1Xe3sQYXr5E5mA6oluOa4JrC0eTsBqb3XBIZxjyUGff1nuEZ8yedCScCpbCac7xFj+4NroShvVejOWSrFZ7SwCXi4RRtDbtFLIhzquoO0ChER/QUWlCcMH3EwkQpWS//aInRCE1Phe+XDSAcWoB Content-ID: <90446FA95A74B94B8D05B0C4D380CEB4@namprd11.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: silabs.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a4a51ef6-660b-465b-2e3b-08d7830c5a19 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Dec 2019 16:15:37.2259 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 54dbd822-5231-4b20-944d-6f4abcd541fb X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: w0YYV1ogO8TNKKrNdVrKuH+trGrUQKAXU635rZdr9S/LkV/TSMHMz6HJSlMUzQrKYYY9DUKnh+qDTuve7eMDPw== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4477 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Jérôme Pouiller mac80211 specification does not forbid hw_scan() to call ieee80211_scan_completed(). However, from userspace point of view, not all applications support this behavior. In particular, the code of iw contains a big fat warning: /* * This code has a bug, which requires creating a separate * nl80211 socket to fix: * It is possible for a NL80211_CMD_NEW_SCAN_RESULTS or * NL80211_CMD_SCAN_ABORTED message to be sent by the kernel * before (!) we listen to it, because we only start listening * after we send our scan request. [...] * Alas, the kernel doesn't do that (yet). */ So, we have to avoid to call ieee80211_scan_completed() from hw_scan() (it's a kind of unwritten rule). This patch relocates the hw_scan() process to a work_struct to fix the problem. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller --- drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- drivers/staging/wfx/scan.h | 1 + drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c | 1 + drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c index b73e61e8da46..540009b72240 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c @@ -71,23 +71,19 @@ static int send_scan_req(struct wfx_vif *wvif, return i - start_idx; } -int wfx_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, - struct ieee80211_scan_request *hw_req) +/* + * It is not really necessary to run scan request asynchronously. However, + * there is a bug in "iw scan" when ieee80211_scan_completed() is called before + * wfx_hw_scan() return + */ +void wfx_hw_scan_work(struct work_struct *work) { - struct wfx_dev *wdev = hw->priv; - struct wfx_vif *wvif = (struct wfx_vif *) vif->drv_priv; + struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, scan_work); + struct ieee80211_scan_request *hw_req = wvif->scan_req; int chan_cur, ret; - WARN_ON(hw_req->req.n_channels > HIF_API_MAX_NB_CHANNELS); - - if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP) - return -EOPNOTSUPP; - - if (wvif->state == WFX_STATE_PRE_STA) - return -EBUSY; - mutex_lock(&wvif->scan_lock); - mutex_lock(&wdev->conf_mutex); + mutex_lock(&wvif->wdev->conf_mutex); update_probe_tmpl(wvif, &hw_req->req); wfx_fwd_probe_req(wvif, true); chan_cur = 0; @@ -96,18 +92,35 @@ int wfx_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, if (ret > 0) chan_cur += ret; } while (ret > 0 && chan_cur < hw_req->req.n_channels); - __ieee80211_scan_completed_compat(hw, ret < 0); - mutex_unlock(&wdev->conf_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&wvif->wdev->conf_mutex); mutex_unlock(&wvif->scan_lock); + __ieee80211_scan_completed_compat(wvif->wdev->hw, ret < 0); if (wvif->delayed_unjoin) { wvif->delayed_unjoin = false; - wfx_tx_lock(wdev); + wfx_tx_lock(wvif->wdev); if (!schedule_work(&wvif->unjoin_work)) - wfx_tx_unlock(wdev); + wfx_tx_unlock(wvif->wdev); } else if (wvif->delayed_link_loss) { wvif->delayed_link_loss = false; wfx_cqm_bssloss_sm(wvif, 1, 0, 0); } +} + +int wfx_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, + struct ieee80211_scan_request *hw_req) +{ + struct wfx_vif *wvif = (struct wfx_vif *)vif->drv_priv; + + WARN_ON(hw_req->req.n_channels > HIF_API_MAX_NB_CHANNELS); + + if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + if (wvif->state == WFX_STATE_PRE_STA) + return -EBUSY; + + wvif->scan_req = hw_req; + schedule_work(&wvif->scan_work); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.h b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.h index 03bc6c7e562d..b547f1927d72 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.h +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.h @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ struct wfx_dev; struct wfx_vif; +void wfx_hw_scan_work(struct work_struct *work); int wfx_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, struct ieee80211_scan_request *req); void wfx_scan_complete(struct wfx_vif *wvif, diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c index 16f5db873275..4354bb8081c5 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c @@ -1427,6 +1427,7 @@ int wfx_add_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif) mutex_init(&wvif->scan_lock); init_completion(&wvif->scan_complete); + INIT_WORK(&wvif->scan_work, wfx_hw_scan_work); mutex_unlock(&wdev->conf_mutex); diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h b/drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h index 3356d0cbf7af..b5f763c3fac7 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h @@ -127,7 +127,9 @@ struct wfx_vif { /* avoid some operations in parallel with scan */ struct mutex scan_lock; + struct work_struct scan_work; struct completion scan_complete; + struct ieee80211_scan_request *scan_req; struct completion set_pm_mode_complete;