From patchwork Thu Mar 21 22:51:33 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Saeed Mahameed X-Patchwork-Id: 1060548 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mellanox.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44QMVg0Dklz9sS0 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:52:11 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727151AbfCUWwI (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:52:08 -0400 Received: from mail-il-dmz.mellanox.com ([193.47.165.129]:55815 "EHLO mellanox.co.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726957AbfCUWwG (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:52:06 -0400 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MTLPINE1 (envelope-from saeedm@mellanox.com) with ESMTPS (AES256-SHA encrypted); 22 Mar 2019 00:52:03 +0200 Received: from sx1.mtl.com ([172.16.5.42]) by labmailer.mlnx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x2LMpnpS031609; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:52:02 +0200 From: Saeed Mahameed To: "David S. Miller" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed , Roi Dayan Subject: [net-next V2 06/15] net/mlx5e: Fix compilation warning in en_tc.c Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:51:33 -0700 Message-Id: <20190321225142.8267-7-saeedm@mellanox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190321225142.8267-1-saeedm@mellanox.com> References: <20190321225142.8267-1-saeedm@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Amazingly a mlx5e_tc function is being called from the eswitch layer, which is by itself very terrible! The function was declared locally in eswitch_offloads.c so it could be used there, which caused the following compilation warning, fix that. drivers/.../mlx5/core/en_tc.c:3242:6: [-Werror=missing-prototypes] error: no previous prototype for ‘mlx5e_tc_clean_fdb_peer_flows’ Fixes: 04de7dda7394 ("net/mlx5e: Infrastructure for duplicated offloading of TC flows") Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h | 3 +++ drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h index 3f3cd32ae60a..e0ba59b5296f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h @@ -431,6 +431,9 @@ static inline int mlx5_eswitch_index_to_vport_num(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, return index; } +/* TODO: This mlx5e_tc function shouldn't be called by eswitch */ +void mlx5e_tc_clean_fdb_peer_flows(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw); + #else /* CONFIG_MLX5_ESWITCH */ /* eswitch API stubs */ static inline int mlx5_eswitch_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) { return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c index ddee935df65d..6c72f33f6d09 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c @@ -1523,8 +1523,6 @@ static int mlx5_esw_offloads_pair(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, return 0; } -void mlx5e_tc_clean_fdb_peer_flows(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw); - static void mlx5_esw_offloads_unpair(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw) { mlx5e_tc_clean_fdb_peer_flows(esw);