diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,4/7] samples/bpf: Extend RLIMIT_MEMLOCK for xdp_{sample_pkts, router_ipv4}

Message ID 20190124214747.6986-5-maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series xdp: Avoid unloading xdp prog not attached by sample | expand

Commit Message

Maciej Fijalkowski Jan. 24, 2019, 9:47 p.m. UTC
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>

There is a common problem with xdp samples that happens when user wants
to run a particular sample and some bpf program is already loaded. The
default 64kb RLIMIT_MEMLOCK resource limit will cause a following error
(assuming that xdp sample that is failing was converted to libbpf
usage):

libbpf: Error in bpf_object__probe_name():Operation not permitted(1).
Couldn't load basic 'r0 = 0' BPF program.
libbpf: failed to load object './xdp_sample_pkts_kern.o'

Fix it in xdp_sample_pkts and xdp_router_ipv4 by setting RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
to RLIM_INFINITY.

Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
---
 samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c | 7 +++++++
 samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

Comments

Jesper Dangaard Brouer Jan. 25, 2019, 8:32 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 22:47:44 +0100
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> 
> There is a common problem with xdp samples that happens when user wants
> to run a particular sample and some bpf program is already loaded. The
> default 64kb RLIMIT_MEMLOCK resource limit will cause a following error
> (assuming that xdp sample that is failing was converted to libbpf
> usage):
> 
> libbpf: Error in bpf_object__probe_name():Operation not permitted(1).
> Couldn't load basic 'r0 = 0' BPF program.
> libbpf: failed to load object './xdp_sample_pkts_kern.o'
> 
> Fix it in xdp_sample_pkts and xdp_router_ipv4 by setting RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
> to RLIM_INFINITY.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> ---
>  samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c | 7 +++++++
>  samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c | 7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c
index cea2306f5ab7..c63c6beec7d6 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_router_ipv4_user.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ 
 #include <sys/syscall.h>
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 #include "bpf/libbpf.h"
+#include <sys/resource.h>
 
 int sock, sock_arp, flags = 0;
 static int total_ifindex;
@@ -609,6 +610,7 @@  static int monitor_route(void)
 
 int main(int ac, char **argv)
 {
+	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
@@ -635,6 +637,11 @@  int main(int ac, char **argv)
 		ifname_list = (argv + 1);
 	}
 
+	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
+		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
+		return 1;
+	}
+
 	if (bpf_prog_load_xattr(&prog_load_attr, &obj, &prog_fd))
 		return 1;
 
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c
index 8dd87c1eb560..5f5828ee0761 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_user.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ 
 #include <signal.h>
 #include <libbpf.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
+#include <sys/resource.h>
 
 #include "perf-sys.h"
 #include "trace_helpers.h"
@@ -99,6 +100,7 @@  static void sig_handler(int signo)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
+	struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
 	struct bpf_prog_load_attr prog_load_attr = {
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 	};
@@ -114,6 +116,11 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		return 1;
 	}
 
+	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r)) {
+		perror("setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)");
+		return 1;
+	}
+
 	numcpus = get_nprocs();
 	if (numcpus > MAX_CPUS)
 		numcpus = MAX_CPUS;