Message ID | 20190109133734.6482-1-fw@strlen.de |
---|---|
State | Awaiting Upstream |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
Series | [ipsec] xfrm: refine validation of template and selector families | expand |
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 02:37:34PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > The check assumes that in transport mode, the first templates family > must match the address family of the policy selector. > > Syzkaller managed to build a template using MODE_ROUTEOPTIMIZATION, > with ipv4-in-ipv6 chain, leading to following splat: > > BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in xfrm_state_find+0x1db/0x1854 > Read of size 4 at addr ffff888063e57aa0 by task a.out/2050 > xfrm_state_find+0x1db/0x1854 > xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0x100/0x1d0 > xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0x108/0x1000 [..] > > Problem is that addresses point into flowi4 struct, but xfrm_state_find > treats them as being ipv6 because it uses templ->encap_family is used > (AF_INET6 in case of reproducer) rather than family (AF_INET). > > This patch inverts the logic: Enforce 'template family must match > selector' EXCEPT for tunnel and BEET mode. > > In BEET and Tunnel mode, xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one will have remote/local > address pointers changed to point at the addresses found in the template, > rather than the flowi ones, so no oob read will occur. > > Reported-by: 3ntr0py1337@gmail.com > Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> > Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Applied, thanks Florian!
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c index 277c1c46fe94..c6d26afcf89d 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c @@ -1488,10 +1488,15 @@ static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family) if (!ut[i].family) ut[i].family = family; - if ((ut[i].mode == XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT) && - (ut[i].family != prev_family)) - return -EINVAL; - + switch (ut[i].mode) { + case XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL: + case XFRM_MODE_BEET: + break; + default: + if (ut[i].family != prev_family) + return -EINVAL; + break; + } if (ut[i].mode >= XFRM_MODE_MAX) return -EINVAL;
The check assumes that in transport mode, the first templates family must match the address family of the policy selector. Syzkaller managed to build a template using MODE_ROUTEOPTIMIZATION, with ipv4-in-ipv6 chain, leading to following splat: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in xfrm_state_find+0x1db/0x1854 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888063e57aa0 by task a.out/2050 xfrm_state_find+0x1db/0x1854 xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0x100/0x1d0 xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0x108/0x1000 [..] Problem is that addresses point into flowi4 struct, but xfrm_state_find treats them as being ipv6 because it uses templ->encap_family is used (AF_INET6 in case of reproducer) rather than family (AF_INET). This patch inverts the logic: Enforce 'template family must match selector' EXCEPT for tunnel and BEET mode. In BEET and Tunnel mode, xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one will have remote/local address pointers changed to point at the addresses found in the template, rather than the flowi ones, so no oob read will occur. Reported-by: 3ntr0py1337@gmail.com Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> --- net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)