@@ -527,8 +527,7 @@ static inline int qeth_is_cq(struct qeth_card *card, unsigned int queue)
queue == card->qdio.no_in_queues - 1;
}
-
-static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card)
+static int __qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card)
{
int rc;
struct qeth_cmd_buffer *iob;
@@ -559,6 +558,17 @@ static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card)
return rc;
}
+static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ spin_lock_irq(get_ccwdev_lock(CARD_RDEV(card)));
+ ret = __qeth_issue_next_read(card);
+ spin_unlock_irq(get_ccwdev_lock(CARD_RDEV(card)));
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static struct qeth_reply *qeth_alloc_reply(struct qeth_card *card)
{
struct qeth_reply *reply;
@@ -1182,7 +1192,7 @@ static void qeth_irq(struct ccw_device *cdev, unsigned long intparm,
return;
if (channel == &card->read &&
channel->state == CH_STATE_UP)
- qeth_issue_next_read(card);
+ __qeth_issue_next_read(card);
iob = channel->iob;
index = channel->buf_no;
For calling ccw_device_start(), issue_next_read() needs to hold the device's ccwlock. This is satisfied for the IRQ handler path (where qeth_irq() gets called under the ccwlock), but we need explicit locking for the initial call by the MPC initialization. Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)