From patchwork Fri Mar 2 20:32:59 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pablo Neira Ayuso X-Patchwork-Id: 880873 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ztLc74dcmz9s5H for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2018 07:33:43 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932973AbeCBUdV (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2018 15:33:21 -0500 Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:54168 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932953AbeCBUdT (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2018 15:33:19 -0500 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8989950EBE for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 21:33:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77689DA247 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 21:33:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix, from userid 99) id 6CAD9DA243; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 21:33:18 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on antivirus1-rhel7.int X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.2 required=7.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, SMTPAUTH_US2,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D54DA243; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 21:33:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.168.1.97 (192.168.1.97) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int); Fri, 02 Mar 2018 21:33:16 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int) Received: from salvia.here (sys.soleta.eu [212.170.55.40]) (Authenticated sender: pneira@us.es) by entrada.int (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 571C341E4805; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 21:33:16 +0100 (CET) X-SMTPAUTHUS: auth mail.us.es From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 11/14] netfilter: nf_tables: return EBUSY if device already belongs to flowtable Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 21:32:59 +0100 Message-Id: <20180302203302.3724-12-pablo@netfilter.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20180302203302.3724-1-pablo@netfilter.org> References: <20180302203302.3724-1-pablo@netfilter.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org If the netdevice is already part of a flowtable, return EBUSY. I cannot find a valid usecase for having two flowtables bound to the same netdevice. We can still have two flowtable where the device set is disjoint. Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c index 8b9fe30de0cd..43acdeef045d 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c @@ -5037,9 +5037,9 @@ static int nf_tables_newflowtable(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk, { const struct nfgenmsg *nfmsg = nlmsg_data(nlh); const struct nf_flowtable_type *type; + struct nft_flowtable *flowtable, *ft; u8 genmask = nft_genmask_next(net); int family = nfmsg->nfgen_family; - struct nft_flowtable *flowtable; struct nft_table *table; struct nft_ctx ctx; int err, i, k; @@ -5099,6 +5099,22 @@ static int nf_tables_newflowtable(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk, goto err3; for (i = 0; i < flowtable->ops_len; i++) { + if (!flowtable->ops[i].dev) + continue; + + list_for_each_entry(ft, &table->flowtables, list) { + for (k = 0; k < ft->ops_len; k++) { + if (!ft->ops[k].dev) + continue; + + if (flowtable->ops[i].dev == ft->ops[k].dev && + flowtable->ops[i].pf == ft->ops[k].pf) { + err = -EBUSY; + goto err4; + } + } + } + err = nf_register_net_hook(net, &flowtable->ops[i]); if (err < 0) goto err4;