| Message ID | 20170725113621.1425-1-phil@nwl.cc |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:36:21 +0200 > I forgot one spot when introducing struct test_obj_val. > > Fixes: e859afe1ee0c5 ("lib: test_rhashtable: fix for large entry counts") > Reported by: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> Please don't put empty lines in the middle of a set of tags like that. I fixed it up this time :) Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/lib/test_rhashtable.c b/lib/test_rhashtable.c index 16949d219291a..0ffca990a8337 100644 --- a/lib/test_rhashtable.c +++ b/lib/test_rhashtable.c @@ -223,7 +223,9 @@ static s64 __init test_rhashtable(struct rhashtable *ht) pr_info(" Deleting %d keys\n", entries); for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) { - u32 key = i * 2; + struct test_obj_val key = { + .id = i * 2, + }; if (array[i].value.id != TEST_INSERT_FAIL) { obj = rhashtable_lookup_fast(ht, &key, test_rht_params);
I forgot one spot when introducing struct test_obj_val. Fixes: e859afe1ee0c5 ("lib: test_rhashtable: fix for large entry counts") Reported by: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> --- lib/test_rhashtable.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)