diff mbox

[ipsec-next,1/6] xfrm: policy: xfrm_get_tos cannot fail

Message ID 20170207140019.20269-2-fw@strlen.de
State Changes Requested, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Florian Westphal Feb. 7, 2017, 2 p.m. UTC 
The comment makes it look like get_tos() is used to validate something,
but it turns out the comment was about xfrm_find_bundle() which got removed
years ago.

xfrm_get_tos will return either the tos (ipv4) or 0 (ipv6).

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 19 +++++--------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 99ad1af2927f..6fffa2fac607 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1538,19 +1538,13 @@  xfrm_tmpl_resolve(struct xfrm_policy **pols, int npols, const struct flowi *fl,
 
 }
 
-/* Check that the bundle accepts the flow and its components are
- * still valid.
- */
-
-static inline int xfrm_get_tos(const struct flowi *fl, int family)
+static int xfrm_get_tos(const struct flowi *fl, int family)
 {
-	struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *afinfo = xfrm_policy_get_afinfo(family);
-	int tos;
-
-	if (!afinfo)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *afinfo;
+	int tos = 0;
 
-	tos = afinfo->get_tos(fl);
+	afinfo = xfrm_policy_get_afinfo(family);
+	tos = afinfo ? afinfo->get_tos(fl) : 0;
 
 	xfrm_policy_put_afinfo(afinfo);
 
@@ -1705,9 +1699,6 @@  static struct dst_entry *xfrm_bundle_create(struct xfrm_policy *policy,
 	xfrm_flowi_addr_get(fl, &saddr, &daddr, family);
 
 	tos = xfrm_get_tos(fl, family);
-	err = tos;
-	if (tos < 0)
-		goto put_states;
 
 	dst_hold(dst);