From patchwork Tue Aug 2 11:41:04 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baole Ni X-Patchwork-Id: 654978 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3s3gw965l6z9t3V for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:03:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934543AbcHBQCv (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 12:02:51 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:9995 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934170AbcHBMSv (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:18:51 -0400 Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2016 05:18:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="743083937" Received: from shsibuild003.sh.intel.com ([10.239.146.225]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2016 05:18:42 -0700 From: Baole Ni To: linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com, ecree@solarflare.com, bkenward@solarflare.com, linux-driver@qlogic.com, computersforpeace@gmail.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, pawel@osciak.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, romieu@fr.zoreil.com, Baohua.Song@csr.com Subject: [PATCH 0734/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:41:04 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802114104.30990-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/falcon_boards.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/falcon_boards.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/falcon_boards.c index 1736f4b..5ace2ac 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/falcon_boards.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/falcon_boards.c @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static ssize_t set_phy_flash_cfg(struct device *dev, return err ? err : count; } -static DEVICE_ATTR(phy_flash_cfg, 0644, show_phy_flash_cfg, set_phy_flash_cfg); +static DEVICE_ATTR(phy_flash_cfg, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, show_phy_flash_cfg, set_phy_flash_cfg); static void sfe4001_fini(struct efx_nic *efx) {