diff mbox

[v6] sctp: be more restrictive in transport selection on bundled sacks

Message ID 20120702122531.GA29681@hmsreliant.think-freely.org
State Not Applicable, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Neil Horman July 2, 2012, 12:25 p.m. UTC
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 07:44:25PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 02:43:19PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> > Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 08:47:50 -0400
> > 
> > > Perhaps we could modify the SubmittingPatches document to indicate that an
> > > Acked-by from a subsystem maintainer implicitly confers authority on the
> > > upstream receiver to request reasonable stylistic changes that don't affect the
> > > functionality of the patch in the interests of maintaining coding conventions.
> > 
> > Yes, that would make sense.
> > 
> 
> 
> I'll propose it in a few days.
> Neil
> 
How does this language sound to you?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

David Miller July 3, 2012, 12:10 a.m. UTC | #1
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:25:31 -0400

> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 07:44:25PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 02:43:19PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> > From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 08:47:50 -0400
>> > 
>> > > Perhaps we could modify the SubmittingPatches document to indicate that an
>> > > Acked-by from a subsystem maintainer implicitly confers authority on the
>> > > upstream receiver to request reasonable stylistic changes that don't affect the
>> > > functionality of the patch in the interests of maintaining coding conventions.
>> > 
>> > Yes, that would make sense.
>> > 
>> 
>> 
>> I'll propose it in a few days.
>> Neil
>> 
> How does this language sound to you?

Looks fine to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jan Ceuleers July 3, 2012, 6:45 p.m. UTC | #2
On 07/02/2012 02:25 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
...

> How does this language sound to you?
...

> +tree maintanier may reapply the subsystem maintainers Acked-by: to the new

s/maintanier/maintainer/

HTH, Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Neil Horman July 3, 2012, 11:42 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:45:18PM +0200, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> On 07/02/2012 02:25 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> ...
> 
> > How does this language sound to you?
> ...
> 
> > +tree maintanier may reapply the subsystem maintainers Acked-by: to the new
> 
> s/maintanier/maintainer/
> 
> HTH, Jan
Thanks Jan, I've fixed it in my local tree, it'll get rolled in the next
version. 
Neil

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index c379a2a..1eaaeb1 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -414,6 +414,16 @@  the part which affects that maintainer's code.  Judgement should be used here.
 When in doubt people should refer to the original discussion in the mailing
 list archives.
 
+Note that an Acked-by: From a subsystem maintainer on a given patch confers
+upon the tree maintainer integrating the path the authority to carry those Acks
+forward through subsequent versions of a patch, as long as those versions do not
+significantly impact the functionality of the patch.  For example, say the isdn
+subsystem maintainer sends an Acked-by: on version 1 of a patch bound for the
+networking tree.  The networking maintainer then requests that some comments in
+the code be modified to comply with the CodingStyle document.  The networking
+tree maintanier may reapply the subsystem maintainers Acked-by: to the new
+version as no significant changes were made to the patch functionality.
+
 If a person has had the opportunity to comment on a patch, but has not
 provided such comments, you may optionally add a "Cc:" tag to the patch.
 This is the only tag which might be added without an explicit action by the