Message ID | 1551184063-40628-5-git-send-email-xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Awaiting Upstream |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
Series | net/mlx5e: Make little improvement for mlx5e | expand |
On 26/02/2019 14:27, xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> > > * Now the encapsulation is not supported for mlx5 VFs. When we try to > offload that action, the -EINVAL is returned, but not -EOPNOTSUPP. > This patch changes the returned value and ignore to confuse user. > The command is shown as below [1]. > > * When max modify header action is zero, we return -EOPNOTSUPP > directly. In this way, we can ignore wrong message info (e.g. > "mlx5: parsed 0 pedit actions, can't do more"). This happens when > offloading pedit actions on mlx(cx4) VFs. The command is shown as below [2]. > > For example: (p2p1_0 is VF net device) > [1] > $ tc filter add dev p2p1_0 protocol ip parent ffff: prio 1 flower skip_sw \ > src_mac e4:11:22:33:44:01 \ > action tunnel_key set \ > src_ip 1.1.1.100 \ > dst_ip 1.1.1.200 \ > dst_port 4789 id 100 \ > action mirred egress redirect dev vxlan0 > > [2] > $ tc filter add dev p2p1_0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 \ > flower skip_sw dst_mac 00:10:56:fb:64:e8 \ > dst_ip 1.1.1.100 src_ip 1.1.1.200 \ > action pedit ex munge eth src set 00:10:56:b4:5d:20 > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c > index 56ac50d..3a02b22 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c > @@ -2035,7 +2035,7 @@ static int parse_tc_pedit_action(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) > { > u8 cmd = (act->id == FLOW_ACTION_MANGLE) ? 0 : 1; > - int err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > + int max_actions, err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > u32 mask, val, offset; > u8 htype; > > @@ -2047,6 +2047,17 @@ static int parse_tc_pedit_action(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, > goto out_err; > } > > + if (namespace == MLX5_FLOW_NAMESPACE_FDB) /* FDB offloading */ > + max_actions = MLX5_CAP_ESW_FLOWTABLE_FDB(priv->mdev, max_modify_header_actions); > + else /* namespace is MLX5_FLOW_NAMESPACE_KERNEL - NIC offloading */ > + max_actions = MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_NIC_RX(priv->mdev, max_modify_header_actions); > + we have the exact same block with comments in alloc_mod_hdr_actions() which is called later after we parse the action and now parsing the pedit fields. your check for max_actions was there in prev v. why move it? if like this I suggest we create a small static function to get max actions for a namespace and call it from both places to get max actions. > + if (!max_actions) { > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, > + "don't support pedit actions, can't offload"); please rephrase the msg to be consistent i.e. The pedit offload action is not supported > + goto out_err; > + } > + > mask = act->mangle.mask; > val = act->mangle.val; > offset = act->mangle.offset; > @@ -2294,7 +2305,8 @@ static int parse_tc_nic_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, > } > break; > default: > - return -EINVAL; > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "The offload action is not supported"); > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > } > } > > @@ -2616,7 +2628,8 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, > break; > } > default: > - return -EINVAL; > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "The offload action is not supported"); > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > } > } > >
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:01 PM Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com> wrote: > > > > On 26/02/2019 14:27, xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> > > > > * Now the encapsulation is not supported for mlx5 VFs. When we try to > > offload that action, the -EINVAL is returned, but not -EOPNOTSUPP. > > This patch changes the returned value and ignore to confuse user. > > The command is shown as below [1]. > > > > * When max modify header action is zero, we return -EOPNOTSUPP > > directly. In this way, we can ignore wrong message info (e.g. > > "mlx5: parsed 0 pedit actions, can't do more"). This happens when > > offloading pedit actions on mlx(cx4) VFs. The command is shown as below [2]. > > > > For example: (p2p1_0 is VF net device) > > [1] > > $ tc filter add dev p2p1_0 protocol ip parent ffff: prio 1 flower skip_sw \ > > src_mac e4:11:22:33:44:01 \ > > action tunnel_key set \ > > src_ip 1.1.1.100 \ > > dst_ip 1.1.1.200 \ > > dst_port 4789 id 100 \ > > action mirred egress redirect dev vxlan0 > > > > [2] > > $ tc filter add dev p2p1_0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 \ > > flower skip_sw dst_mac 00:10:56:fb:64:e8 \ > > dst_ip 1.1.1.100 src_ip 1.1.1.200 \ > > action pedit ex munge eth src set 00:10:56:b4:5d:20 > > > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c > > index 56ac50d..3a02b22 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c > > @@ -2035,7 +2035,7 @@ static int parse_tc_pedit_action(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, > > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) > > { > > u8 cmd = (act->id == FLOW_ACTION_MANGLE) ? 0 : 1; > > - int err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > > + int max_actions, err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > > u32 mask, val, offset; > > u8 htype; > > > > @@ -2047,6 +2047,17 @@ static int parse_tc_pedit_action(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, > > goto out_err; > > } > > > > + if (namespace == MLX5_FLOW_NAMESPACE_FDB) /* FDB offloading */ > > + max_actions = MLX5_CAP_ESW_FLOWTABLE_FDB(priv->mdev, max_modify_header_actions); > > + else /* namespace is MLX5_FLOW_NAMESPACE_KERNEL - NIC offloading */ > > + max_actions = MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_NIC_RX(priv->mdev, max_modify_header_actions); > > + > > we have the exact same block with comments in alloc_mod_hdr_actions() which > is called later after we parse the action and now parsing the pedit fields. > your check for max_actions was there in prev v. why move it? I think we should check it as soon as possible. > if like this I suggest we create a small static function to get max actions > for a namespace and call it from both places to get max actions. it's ok. > > + if (!max_actions) { > > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, > > + "don't support pedit actions, can't offload"); > > please rephrase the msg to be consistent > i.e. The pedit offload action is not supported > > > + goto out_err; > > + } > > + > > mask = act->mangle.mask; > > val = act->mangle.val; > > offset = act->mangle.offset; > > @@ -2294,7 +2305,8 @@ static int parse_tc_nic_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, > > } > > break; > > default: > > - return -EINVAL; > > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "The offload action is not supported"); > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > } > > } > > > > @@ -2616,7 +2628,8 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, > > break; > > } > > default: > > - return -EINVAL; > > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "The offload action is not supported"); > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > } > > } > > > >
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c index 56ac50d..3a02b22 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c @@ -2035,7 +2035,7 @@ static int parse_tc_pedit_action(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) { u8 cmd = (act->id == FLOW_ACTION_MANGLE) ? 0 : 1; - int err = -EOPNOTSUPP; + int max_actions, err = -EOPNOTSUPP; u32 mask, val, offset; u8 htype; @@ -2047,6 +2047,17 @@ static int parse_tc_pedit_action(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, goto out_err; } + if (namespace == MLX5_FLOW_NAMESPACE_FDB) /* FDB offloading */ + max_actions = MLX5_CAP_ESW_FLOWTABLE_FDB(priv->mdev, max_modify_header_actions); + else /* namespace is MLX5_FLOW_NAMESPACE_KERNEL - NIC offloading */ + max_actions = MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_NIC_RX(priv->mdev, max_modify_header_actions); + + if (!max_actions) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, + "don't support pedit actions, can't offload"); + goto out_err; + } + mask = act->mangle.mask; val = act->mangle.val; offset = act->mangle.offset; @@ -2294,7 +2305,8 @@ static int parse_tc_nic_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, } break; default: - return -EINVAL; + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "The offload action is not supported"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; } } @@ -2616,7 +2628,8 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, break; } default: - return -EINVAL; + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "The offload action is not supported"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; } }