From patchwork Wed Jul 5 23:31:39 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Paul E. McKenney" X-Patchwork-Id: 784919 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3x2xxw37FXz9s72 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:33:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752769AbdGEXcA (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:32:00 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:57481 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752618AbdGEXbu (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:31:50 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v65NSxeS136122 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:31:49 -0400 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2bh0tf6yqf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 19:31:49 -0400 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:31:48 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.27) by e11.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.198) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:31:42 -0400 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v65NVgHm23986210; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 23:31:42 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3218B204D; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:29:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.110]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB0FB2052; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:29:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E4D3016C690E; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:31:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, dave@stgolabs.net, manfred@colorfullife.com, tj@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Ingo Molnar Subject: [PATCH v2 5/9] exit: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:31:39 -0700 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.2 In-Reply-To: <20170705232955.GA15992@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20170705232955.GA15992@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17070523-2213-0000-0000-000001F1BBAF X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00007326; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000214; SDB=6.00883401; UDB=6.00440697; IPR=6.00663592; BA=6.00005454; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00016100; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2017-07-05 23:31:47 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17070523-2214-0000-0000-000056C46CB1 Message-Id: <1499297503-23852-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-07-05_16:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1707050383 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics, and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock pair. This commit therefore replaces the spin_unlock_wait() call in do_exit() with spin_lock() followed immediately by spin_unlock(). This should be safe from a performance perspective because the lock is a per-task lock, and this is happening only at task-exit time. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Alan Stern Cc: Andrea Parri Cc: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/exit.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index 516acdb0e0ec..6d19c9090d43 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -832,7 +832,8 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code) * Ensure that we must observe the pi_state in exit_mm() -> * mm_release() -> exit_pi_state_list(). */ - raw_spin_unlock_wait(&tsk->pi_lock); + raw_spin_lock_irq(&tsk->pi_lock); + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->pi_lock); if (unlikely(in_atomic())) { pr_info("note: %s[%d] exited with preempt_count %d\n",