From patchwork Wed Jun 7 09:16:06 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ding Tianhong X-Patchwork-Id: 772286 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3wjNHC2QwKz9ryb for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 19:17:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751856AbdFGJQ4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 05:16:56 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:6880 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751684AbdFGJQw (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 05:16:52 -0400 Received: from 172.30.72.53 (EHLO DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com) ([172.30.72.53]) by dggrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.4.6-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AOX19767; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 17:16:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.177.23.32) by DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.301.0; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:16:19 +0800 From: Ding Tianhong To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: Ding Tianhong Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] PCI: Add new PCIe Fabric End Node flag, PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:16:06 +0800 Message-ID: <1496826968-10152-2-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.5.2.msysgit.0 In-Reply-To: <1496826968-10152-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> References: <1496826968-10152-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.177.23.32] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.5937C473.0039, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2014-11-16 11:51:01, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 091a113b84247942787b0e7899793cc9 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Casey Leedom The new flag PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING indicates that the Relaxed Ordering Attribute should not be used on Transaction Layer Packets destined for the PCIe End Node so flagged. Initially flagged this way are Intel E5-26xx Root Complex Ports which suffer from a Flow Control Credit Performance Problem and AMD A1100 ARM ("SEATTLE") Root Complex Ports which don't obey PCIe 3.0 ordering rules which can lead to Data Corruption. Signed-off-by: Casey Leedom Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong --- drivers/pci/quirks.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c index 085fb78..58bdd23 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c @@ -3999,6 +3999,44 @@ static void quirk_tw686x_class(struct pci_dev *pdev) quirk_tw686x_class); /* + * Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed + * Ordering Attribute set. Such devices should mark themselves and other + * Device Drivers should check before sending TLPs with RO set. + */ +static void quirk_relaxedordering_disable(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + dev->dev_flags |= PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING; +} + +/* + * Intel E5-26xx Root Complex has a Flow Control Credit issue which can + * cause performance problems with Upstream Transaction Layer Packets with + * Relaxed Ordering set. + */ +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f02, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f04, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f08, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); + +/* + * The AMD ARM A1100 (AKA "SEATTLE") SoC has a bug in its PCIe Root Complex + * where Upstream Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed Ordering + * Attribute clear are allowed to bypass earlier TLPs with Relaxed Ordering + * set. This is a violation of the PCIe 3.0 Transaction Ordering Rules + * outlined in Section 2.4.1 (PCI Express(r) Base Specification Revision 3.0 + * November 10, 2010). As a result, on this platform we can't use Relaxed + * Ordering for Upstream TLPs. + */ +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, 0x1a00, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, 0x1a01, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, 0x1a02, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); + +/* * Per PCIe r3.0, sec 2.2.9, "Completion headers must supply the same * values for the Attribute as were supplied in the header of the * corresponding Request, except as explicitly allowed when IDO is used." diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index 33c2b0b..e1e8428 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags { PCI_DEV_FLAGS_BRIDGE_XLATE_ROOT = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 9), /* Do not use FLR even if device advertises PCI_AF_CAP */ PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_FLR_RESET = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 10), + /* Don't use Relaxed Ordering for TLPs directed at this device */ + PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 11), }; enum pci_irq_reroute_variant {