diff mbox

[V2,2/4] net: can: ifi: Fix TX DLC configuration

Message ID 1456915359-6775-3-git-send-email-marex@denx.de
State Awaiting Upstream, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Marek Vasut March 2, 2016, 10:42 a.m. UTC
The TX DLC, the transmission length information, was not written
into the transmit configuration register. When using the CAN core
with different CAN controller, the receiving CAN controller will
receive only the ID part of the CAN frame, but no data at all.

This patch adds the TX DLC into the register to fix this issue.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
---
V2: - Use can_len2dlc() unconditionally to sanitize DLC in the TX path
    - The CAN_CTRLMODE_CANFD_NON_ISO can only ever be set if the
      CANFD_CTRLMODE_CANFD is set. Use only the later for checking
      if the core transmits in CANFD mode.
---
 drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Oliver Hartkopp March 2, 2016, 6:46 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Marek,

sorry for picking this patch up again.

After looking around in the original source I have one more comment:

On 03/02/2016 11:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:

> -	if (priv->can.ctrlmode & (CAN_CTRLMODE_FD | CAN_CTRLMODE_FD_NON_ISO)) {
> -		if (can_is_canfd_skb(skb)) {
> -			txdlc |= IFI_CANFD_TXFIFO_DLC_EDL;
> -			if (cf->flags & CANFD_BRS)
> -				txdlc |= IFI_CANFD_TXFIFO_DLC_BRS;
> -		}
> +	txdlc |= can_len2dlc(cf->len);

At the top of the function you defined

	u32 txst, txid;
	u32 txdlc = 0;

and here you use 'txdlc |= ...'.

That's weird style IMO.

Please change it to

	u32 txst, txid, txdlc;

and

	txdlc = can_len2dlc(cf->len);


Thanks,
Oliver
Marek Vasut March 2, 2016, 8:14 p.m. UTC | #2
On 03/02/2016 07:46 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Hi Marek,

Hi!

> sorry for picking this patch up again.

nothing to be sorry about, thanks for the input :)

> After looking around in the original source I have one more comment:
> 
> On 03/02/2016 11:42 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> 
>> -	if (priv->can.ctrlmode & (CAN_CTRLMODE_FD | CAN_CTRLMODE_FD_NON_ISO)) {
>> -		if (can_is_canfd_skb(skb)) {
>> -			txdlc |= IFI_CANFD_TXFIFO_DLC_EDL;
>> -			if (cf->flags & CANFD_BRS)
>> -				txdlc |= IFI_CANFD_TXFIFO_DLC_BRS;
>> -		}
>> +	txdlc |= can_len2dlc(cf->len);
> 
> At the top of the function you defined
> 
> 	u32 txst, txid;
> 	u32 txdlc = 0;
> 
> and here you use 'txdlc |= ...'.
> 
> That's weird style IMO.
> 
> Please change it to
> 
> 	u32 txst, txid, txdlc;
> 
> and
> 
> 	txdlc = can_len2dlc(cf->len);

I'll send a V3 shortly.

btw. I forgot to add V2 to the 3/4 and 4/4 patches, sigh.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c
index 72f5205..4bbc7d9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c
@@ -772,12 +772,11 @@  static netdev_tx_t ifi_canfd_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		txid = cf->can_id & CAN_SFF_MASK;
 	}
 
-	if (priv->can.ctrlmode & (CAN_CTRLMODE_FD | CAN_CTRLMODE_FD_NON_ISO)) {
-		if (can_is_canfd_skb(skb)) {
-			txdlc |= IFI_CANFD_TXFIFO_DLC_EDL;
-			if (cf->flags & CANFD_BRS)
-				txdlc |= IFI_CANFD_TXFIFO_DLC_BRS;
-		}
+	txdlc |= can_len2dlc(cf->len);
+	if ((priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) && can_is_canfd_skb(skb)) {
+		txdlc |= IFI_CANFD_TXFIFO_DLC_EDL;
+		if (cf->flags & CANFD_BRS)
+			txdlc |= IFI_CANFD_TXFIFO_DLC_BRS;
 	}
 
 	if (cf->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)