[net-next,2/2] net/davinci_emac: use clk_{prepare|unprepare}

Use clk_prepare()/clk_unprepare() in the driver since common
clock framework needs these to be called before clock is enabled.

This is in preparation of common clock framework migration
for DaVinci.

Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_emac.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Quoting Sekhar Nori (2013-03-25 02:25:47)
> Use clk_prepare()/clk_unprepare() in the driver since common
> clock framework needs these to be called before clock is enabled.
> 
> This is in preparation of common clock framework migration
> for DaVinci.
> 
> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_emac.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_emac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_emac.c
> index b1349b5..436296c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_emac.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_emac.c
> @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ struct emac_priv {
>         /*platform specific members*/
>         void (*int_enable) (void);
>         void (*int_disable) (void);
> +       struct clk *clk;
>  };
>  
>  /* EMAC TX Host Error description strings */
> @@ -1870,19 +1871,29 @@ static int davinci_emac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get EMAC clock\n");
>                 return -EBUSY;
>         }
> +
> +       rc = clk_prepare(emac_clk);
> +       if (rc) {
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "emac clock prepare failed.\n");
> +               return rc;
> +       }
> +

Is clk_enable ever called for emac_clk here?  I don't see it in the
diff.  clk_prepare and clk_enable should usually be paired, even if
simply calling clk_prepare generates the clock signal that your device
needs.

Also this change only calls clk_prepare at probe-time and clk_unprepare
at remove-time.  Preparing a clock can result in power consumption.
With that in mind should your implementation be more aggressive about
calling clk_{un}prepare?

Regards,
Mike

>         emac_bus_frequency = clk_get_rate(emac_clk);
>  
>         /* TODO: Probe PHY here if possible */
>  
>         ndev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(struct emac_priv));
> -       if (!ndev)
> -               return -ENOMEM;
> +       if (!ndev) {
> +               rc = -ENOMEM;
> +               goto no_etherdev;
> +       }
>  
>         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ndev);
>         priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>         priv->pdev = pdev;
>         priv->ndev = ndev;
>         priv->msg_enable = netif_msg_init(debug_level, DAVINCI_EMAC_DEBUG);
> +       priv->clk = emac_clk;
>  
>         spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
>  
> @@ -2020,6 +2031,8 @@ no_cpdma_chan:
>         cpdma_ctlr_destroy(priv->dma);
>  no_pdata:
>         free_netdev(ndev);
> +no_etherdev:
> +       clk_unprepare(emac_clk);
>         return rc;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2048,6 +2061,8 @@ static int davinci_emac_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         unregister_netdev(ndev);
>         free_netdev(ndev);
>  
> +       clk_unprepare(priv->clk);
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.10.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html