diff mbox

net: use sock_valbool_flag to set/clear SOCK_RXQ_OVFL

Message ID 1317994221.3988.12.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Johannes Berg Oct. 7, 2011, 1:30 p.m. UTC
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

There's no point in open-coding sock_valbool_flag().

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
---
 net/core/sock.c |    5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Neil Horman Oct. 7, 2011, 1:40 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:30:20PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> 
> There's no point in open-coding sock_valbool_flag().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> ---
>  net/core/sock.c |    5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/net/core/sock.c	2011-10-07 15:26:30.000000000 +0200
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c	2011-10-07 15:27:46.000000000 +0200
> @@ -738,10 +738,7 @@ set_rcvbuf:
>  		/* We implement the SO_SNDLOWAT etc to
>  		   not be settable (1003.1g 5.3) */
>  	case SO_RXQ_OVFL:
> -		if (valbool)
> -			sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RXQ_OVFL);
> -		else
> -			sock_reset_flag(sk, SOCK_RXQ_OVFL);
> +		sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_RXQ_OVFL, valbool);
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Looks good, thanks Johannes!
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
David Miller Oct. 7, 2011, 5:27 p.m. UTC | #2
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 09:40:23 -0400

> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:30:20PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
>> 
>> There's no point in open-coding sock_valbool_flag().
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
 ...
> Looks good, thanks Johannes!
> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

Applied to net-next, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

--- a/net/core/sock.c	2011-10-07 15:26:30.000000000 +0200
+++ b/net/core/sock.c	2011-10-07 15:27:46.000000000 +0200
@@ -738,10 +738,7 @@  set_rcvbuf:
 		/* We implement the SO_SNDLOWAT etc to
 		   not be settable (1003.1g 5.3) */
 	case SO_RXQ_OVFL:
-		if (valbool)
-			sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RXQ_OVFL);
-		else
-			sock_reset_flag(sk, SOCK_RXQ_OVFL);
+		sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_RXQ_OVFL, valbool);
 		break;
 	default:
 		ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;