| Message ID | 20191218195510.7782-1-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Multipath TCP part 2: Single subflow | expand |
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:54:55 -0800 > v1 -> v2: Rebased on latest "Multipath TCP: Prerequisites" v3 series This really can't proceed in this manner. Wait until one patch series is fully reviewed and integrated before trying to build things on top of it, ok? Nobody is going to review this second series in any reasonable manner while the prerequisites are not upstream yet. Thank you.
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019, David Miller wrote: > From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> > Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:54:55 -0800 > >> v1 -> v2: Rebased on latest "Multipath TCP: Prerequisites" v3 series > > This really can't proceed in this manner. > > Wait until one patch series is fully reviewed and integrated before > trying to build things on top of it, ok? > > Nobody is going to review this second series in any reasonable manner > while the prerequisites are not upstream yet. > > Thank you. Will do. Thank you for the process feedback. -- Mat Martineau Intel
On 12/18/19 12:42 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> > Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:54:55 -0800 > >> v1 -> v2: Rebased on latest "Multipath TCP: Prerequisites" v3 series > > This really can't proceed in this manner. > > Wait until one patch series is fully reviewed and integrated before > trying to build things on top of it, ok? > > Nobody is going to review this second series in any reasonable manner > while the prerequisites are not upstream yet. > Also I want to point that for some reasons MPTCP folks provide patch series during the last two weeks of the year. I don't know about you, but I try to share this time with my family. So this does not make me being indulgent about MPTCP :/ Thanks.
On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 07:03 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On 12/18/19 12:42 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> > > Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:54:55 -0800 > > > > > v1 -> v2: Rebased on latest "Multipath TCP: Prerequisites" v3 series > > > > This really can't proceed in this manner. > > > > Wait until one patch series is fully reviewed and integrated before > > trying to build things on top of it, ok? > > > > Nobody is going to review this second series in any reasonable manner > > while the prerequisites are not upstream yet. > > > > Also I want to point that for some reasons MPTCP folks provide > patch series during the last two weeks of the year. > > I don't know about you, but I try to share this time with my family. > So this does not make me being indulgent about MPTCP :/ We are sorry if our course of action is perceived as aggressive or worse. The idea was to share our progress giving enough context to get a more complete picture. We tried to reply to the feedback in a timely manner to demonstrate collaborative behavior and not with the goal to hard press anyone! We are very sorry if we gave a different impression! We understand the time of the year is unfortunate, we have been a bit delayed by several related an unrelated issues - idea was to post v1 just after net-next re-open. We appreciate a lot all the feedback received, which helped improving the code significantly. I understand you prefer we will have the next iteration in the new year, am I correct? Thank you! Paolo
On 12/20/19 7:51 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > I understand you prefer we will have the next iteration in the new > year, am I correct? Yes please, I wont be able to participate in discussions until January 2nd. Thanks.