Message ID | 20190125095507.29334-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mv88e6xxx DSA suspend to RAM support | expand |
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:55:05 +0100 > After a first attempt of bringing S2RAM support to the DSA switch, it > has been reported that a part of the configuration was lost during the > cycle. This second version adds a first patch that saves the rules in > a per-chip list when they are applied, so that in the second patch we > bring S2RAM support by also re-applying these rules. ... It seems like the discussion on patch #1 has hit a brick wall. The last suggestion was to use: + switch (mode) { + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX: + phydev->speed = SPEED_2500; + break; + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GKR: + phydev->speed = SPEED_10000; + break; + in dsa_port_fixed_link_register_of(), but that doesn't work because swphy will fail without speed=1000 in the dts. Well, whatever is decided, the commit message need to be updated to explain why this course of action for the most immediate fix was ultimately taken. Thanks.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 01:22:50PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> > Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:55:05 +0100 > > > After a first attempt of bringing S2RAM support to the DSA switch, it > > has been reported that a part of the configuration was lost during the > > cycle. This second version adds a first patch that saves the rules in > > a per-chip list when they are applied, so that in the second patch we > > bring S2RAM support by also re-applying these rules. > ... > > It seems like the discussion on patch #1 has hit a brick wall. > > The last suggestion was to use: > > + switch (mode) { > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX: > + phydev->speed = SPEED_2500; > + break; > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GKR: > + phydev->speed = SPEED_10000; > + break; > + > > in dsa_port_fixed_link_register_of(), but that doesn't work > because swphy will fail without speed=1000 in the dts. > > Well, whatever is decided, the commit message need to be updated > to explain why this course of action for the most immediate fix > was ultimately taken. Hi David Err. I think you are replying to the wrong patch? This comment fits to https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg546662.html Although i don't like it, i think for the moment we are going to have to accept the proposed fix. Andrew
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 22:46:52 +0100 > I think you are replying to the wrong patch? This comment fits to > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg546662.html I noticed that right after I hit send, you are right. Sorry for the confusion. > Although i don't like it, i think for the moment we are going to have > to accept the proposed fix. Indeed.