Message ID | 20180522022230.2492505-1-ast@kernel.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | bpfilter | expand |
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 19:22:28 -0700 > v2->v3: > - followed Luis's suggestion and significantly simplied first patch > with shmem_kernel_file_setup+kernel_write. Added kdoc for new helper > - fixed typos and race to access pipes with mutex > - tested with bpfilter being 'builtin'. CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH=y|m both work. > Interesting to see a usermode executable being embedded inside vmlinux. > - it doesn't hurt to enable bpfilter in .config. > ip_setsockopt commands sent to usermode via pipes and -ENOPROTOOPT is > returned from userspace, so kernel falls back to original iptables code > > v1->v2: > this patch set is almost a full rewrite of the earlier umh modules approach > The v1 of patches and follow up discussion was covered by LWN: > https://lwn.net/Articles/749108/ > > I believe the v2 addresses all issues brought up by Andy and others. > Mainly there are zero changes to kernel/module.c > Instead of teaching module loading logic to recognize special > umh module, let normal kernel modules execute part of its own > .init.rodata as a new user space process (Andy's idea) > Patch 1 introduces this new helper: > int fork_usermode_blob(void *data, size_t len, struct umh_info *info); > Input: > data + len == executable file > Output: > struct umh_info { > struct file *pipe_to_umh; > struct file *pipe_from_umh; > pid_t pid; > }; Series applied, let the madness begin... :-)
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 01:26:48PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 19:22:28 -0700 > > > v2->v3: > > - followed Luis's suggestion and significantly simplied first patch > > with shmem_kernel_file_setup+kernel_write. Added kdoc for new helper > > - fixed typos and race to access pipes with mutex > > - tested with bpfilter being 'builtin'. CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH=y|m both work. > > Interesting to see a usermode executable being embedded inside vmlinux. > > - it doesn't hurt to enable bpfilter in .config. > > ip_setsockopt commands sent to usermode via pipes and -ENOPROTOOPT is > > returned from userspace, so kernel falls back to original iptables code > > > > v1->v2: > > this patch set is almost a full rewrite of the earlier umh modules approach > > The v1 of patches and follow up discussion was covered by LWN: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/749108/ > > > > I believe the v2 addresses all issues brought up by Andy and others. > > Mainly there are zero changes to kernel/module.c > > Instead of teaching module loading logic to recognize special > > umh module, let normal kernel modules execute part of its own > > .init.rodata as a new user space process (Andy's idea) > > Patch 1 introduces this new helper: > > int fork_usermode_blob(void *data, size_t len, struct umh_info *info); > > Input: > > data + len == executable file > > Output: > > struct umh_info { > > struct file *pipe_to_umh; > > struct file *pipe_from_umh; > > pid_t pid; > > }; > > Series applied, let the madness begin... :-) Yeah, this is going to be fun :)
Minor glitch with Ubuntu 18.04: $ gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 7.3.0-16ubuntu3) 7.3.0 In file included from /usr/include/fcntl.h:290:0, from ../net/bpfilter/main.c:7: In function ‘open’, inlined from ‘main’ at ../net/bpfilter/main.c:58:13: /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/fcntl2.h:50:4: error: call to ‘__open_missing_mode’ declared with attribute error: open with O_CREAT or O_TMPFILE in second argument needs 3 arguments __open_missing_mode (); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ scripts/Makefile.host:107: recipe for target 'net/bpfilter/main.o' failed make[3]: *** [net/bpfilter/main.o] Error 1 I can't repro on Fedora 27 gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5), perhaps the GCC is broken on that Ubuntu 18.04 box of mine. The warning/ /error, however, looks potentially legit?
On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:33:52 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Minor glitch with Ubuntu 18.04: > > $ gcc --version > gcc (Ubuntu 7.3.0-16ubuntu3) 7.3.0 > > In file included from /usr/include/fcntl.h:290:0, > from ../net/bpfilter/main.c:7: > In function ‘open’, > inlined from ‘main’ at ../net/bpfilter/main.c:58:13: > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/fcntl2.h:50:4: error: call to ‘__open_missing_mode’ declared with attribute error: open with O_CREAT or O_TMPFILE in second argument needs 3 arguments > __open_missing_mode (); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > scripts/Makefile.host:107: recipe for target 'net/bpfilter/main.o' failed > make[3]: *** [net/bpfilter/main.o] Error 1 > > I can't repro on Fedora 27 gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5), > perhaps the GCC is broken on that Ubuntu 18.04 box of mine. The warning/ > /error, however, looks potentially legit? More? Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#9) Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 1620 modules ERROR: "bpfilter_process_sockopt" [net/bpfilter/bpfilter.ko] undefined! ../scripts/Makefile.modpost:92: recipe for target '__modpost' failed make[2]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 /home/jkicinski/devel/linux/Makefile:1274: recipe for target 'modules' failed make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jkicinski/devel/linux/build_randconfig' Makefile:146: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
On 5/23/18 6:50 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:33:52 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> Minor glitch with Ubuntu 18.04: >> >> $ gcc --version >> gcc (Ubuntu 7.3.0-16ubuntu3) 7.3.0 >> >> In file included from /usr/include/fcntl.h:290:0, >> from ../net/bpfilter/main.c:7: >> In function ‘open’, >> inlined from ‘main’ at ../net/bpfilter/main.c:58:13: >> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/fcntl2.h:50:4: error: call to ‘__open_missing_mode’ declared with attribute error: open with O_CREAT or O_TMPFILE in second argument needs 3 arguments >> __open_missing_mode (); >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> scripts/Makefile.host:107: recipe for target 'net/bpfilter/main.o' failed >> make[3]: *** [net/bpfilter/main.o] Error 1 >> >> I can't repro on Fedora 27 gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5), >> perhaps the GCC is broken on that Ubuntu 18.04 box of mine. The warning/ >> /error, however, looks potentially legit? > > More? > > Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#9) > Building modules, stage 2. > MODPOST 1620 modules > ERROR: "bpfilter_process_sockopt" [net/bpfilter/bpfilter.ko] undefined! > ../scripts/Makefile.modpost:92: recipe for target '__modpost' failed hmm. how come buildbot didn't yell at me for any of these things. will take a look soon.