Message ID | 151809046123.4625.11746882480100311060.stgit@firesoul |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | tools/libbpf improvements and selftests | expand |
On 02/08/2018 12:48 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > While playing with using libbpf for the Suricata project, we had > issues LLVM >= 4.0.1 generating ELF files that could not be loaded > with libbpf (tools/lib/bpf/). > > During the troubleshooting phase, I wrote a test program and improved > the debugging output in libbpf. I turned this into a selftests > program, and it also serves as a code example for libbpf in itself. > > I discovered that there are at least three ELF load issues with > libbpf. I left them as TODO comments in (tools/testing/selftests/bpf) > test_libbpf.sh. I've only fixed the load issue with eh_frames, and > other types of relo-section that does not have exec flags. We can > work on the other issues later. Applied it to bpf tree, thanks Jesper!
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 02:32:27 +0100 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote: > On 02/08/2018 12:48 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > While playing with using libbpf for the Suricata project, we had > > issues LLVM >= 4.0.1 generating ELF files that could not be loaded > > with libbpf (tools/lib/bpf/). > > > > During the troubleshooting phase, I wrote a test program and improved > > the debugging output in libbpf. I turned this into a selftests > > program, and it also serves as a code example for libbpf in itself. > > > > I discovered that there are at least three ELF load issues with > > libbpf. I left them as TODO comments in (tools/testing/selftests/bpf) > > test_libbpf.sh. I've only fixed the load issue with eh_frames, and > > other types of relo-section that does not have exec flags. We can > > work on the other issues later. > > Applied it to bpf tree, thanks Jesper! Thank you for applying this the 'bpf' tree! -- appreciate it!
On 02/09/2018 09:18 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 02:32:27 +0100 > Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote: > >> On 02/08/2018 12:48 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: >>> While playing with using libbpf for the Suricata project, we had >>> issues LLVM >= 4.0.1 generating ELF files that could not be loaded >>> with libbpf (tools/lib/bpf/). >>> >>> During the troubleshooting phase, I wrote a test program and improved >>> the debugging output in libbpf. I turned this into a selftests >>> program, and it also serves as a code example for libbpf in itself. >>> >>> I discovered that there are at least three ELF load issues with >>> libbpf. I left them as TODO comments in (tools/testing/selftests/bpf) >>> test_libbpf.sh. I've only fixed the load issue with eh_frames, and >>> other types of relo-section that does not have exec flags. We can >>> work on the other issues later. >> >> Applied it to bpf tree, thanks Jesper! > > Thank you for applying this the 'bpf' tree! -- appreciate it! Btw, if you have a chance to send a small doc update for the Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.txt and describe somewhere in the LLVM section of the doc the discussed issue around gnu/stubs-32.h with possible workarounds, that would be great. Thanks, Daniel