diff mbox series

[2/4] syscalls/kill03, 04: Cleanup && Convert to new library

Message ID 1597919168-10702-2-git-send-email-zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [1/4] syscalls/kill01: Remove it | expand

Commit Message

Feiyu Zhu Aug. 20, 2020, 10:26 a.m. UTC
1) Remove uclinux code
2) Take use of safe macro
3) Merge kill04 into kill03
4) Add error test that pid is INT_MIN

Reviewed-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Feiyu Zhu <zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 runtest/syscalls                          |   1 -
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/.gitignore |   1 -
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill03.c   | 203 +++++++++---------------------
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill04.c   | 133 --------------------
 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 279 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill04.c

Comments

Li Wang Aug. 20, 2020, 12:18 p.m. UTC | #1
Feiyu Zhu <zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

...
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +static pid_t real_pid, fake_pid, int_min_pid;
> +static void cleanup(void);
> +
> +static struct tcase {
> +       int test_sig;
> +       int exp_errno;
> +       int child_flag;
>

The child_flag field is not necessary, we could prepare a real child in
setup()
and reclaim it after testing via check the real_pid value, that will be
more easily.
Yang Xu Aug. 21, 2020, 1:18 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Li


> 
> Feiyu Zhu <zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com <mailto:zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>> wrote:
> 
>     ...
>     +#include <unistd.h>
>     +#include "tst_test.h"
>     +
>     +static pid_t real_pid, fake_pid, int_min_pid;
>     +static void cleanup(void);
>     +
>     +static struct tcase {
>     +       int test_sig;
>     +       int exp_errno;
>     +       int child_flag;
> 
> 
> The child_flag field is not necessary, we could prepare a real child in 
> setup()
> and reclaim it after testing via check the real_pid value, that will be 
> more easily.
When I reviewed this patch in internal, I had the same idea. But when I 
try it and this case will hang because sub test will wait children 
finished by using tst_reap_childrens below:

lib/tst_test.c
static void run_tests(void)
{
	...
	 for (i = 0; i < tst_test->tcnt; i++) {
                 saved_results = *results;
                 tst_test->test(i);

                 if (getpid() != main_pid) {
                         exit(0);
                 }

                 tst_reap_children();

                 if (results_equal(&saved_results, results))
                         tst_brk(TBROK, "Test %i haven't reported 
results!", i);
         }


}

Also, we can use the current process id but it may has unexpected result 
when kill succeed. So fork a child to test maybe a better solution.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Li Wang
> 
>
Li Wang Aug. 21, 2020, 1:56 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:18 AM Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
wrote:

> Hi Li
>
>
> >
> > Feiyu Zhu <zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com <mailto:zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >     ...
> >     +#include <unistd.h>
> >     +#include "tst_test.h"
> >     +
> >     +static pid_t real_pid, fake_pid, int_min_pid;
> >     +static void cleanup(void);
> >     +
> >     +static struct tcase {
> >     +       int test_sig;
> >     +       int exp_errno;
> >     +       int child_flag;
> >
> >
> > The child_flag field is not necessary, we could prepare a real child in
> > setup()
> > and reclaim it after testing via check the real_pid value, that will be
> > more easily.
> When I reviewed this patch in internal, I had the same idea. But when I
> try it and this case will hang because sub test will wait children
> finished by using tst_reap_childrens below:
>
> lib/tst_test.c
> static void run_tests(void)
> {
>         ...
>          for (i = 0; i < tst_test->tcnt; i++) {
>                  saved_results = *results;
>                  tst_test->test(i);
>
>                  if (getpid() != main_pid) {
>                          exit(0);
>                  }
>
>                  tst_reap_children();
>
>                  if (results_equal(&saved_results, results))
>                          tst_brk(TBROK, "Test %i haven't reported
> results!", i);
>          }
>
>
> }
>
> Also, we can use the current process id but it may has unexpected result
> when kill succeed. So fork a child to test maybe a better solution.
>

Hmm, sorry for the uncleared description, actually I meant, to use real_pid
instead of the tc->child_flag directly, then start to reclaim the child
when the
real_pid test finishing.

Does this below diff work for you?

--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill03.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill03.c
@@ -21,24 +21,17 @@ static void cleanup(void);
 static struct tcase {
        int test_sig;
        int exp_errno;
-       int child_flag;
        pid_t *pid;
 } tcases[] = {
-       {2000, EINVAL, 1, &real_pid},
-       {SIGKILL, ESRCH, 0, &fake_pid},
-       {SIGKILL, ESRCH, 0, &int_min_pid}
+       {2000, EINVAL, &real_pid},
+       {SIGKILL, ESRCH, &fake_pid},
+       {SIGKILL, ESRCH, &int_min_pid}
 };

 static void verify_kill(unsigned int n)
 {
        struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];

-       if (tc->child_flag) {
-               real_pid = SAFE_FORK();
-               if (!real_pid)
-                       pause();
-       }
-
        TEST(kill(*tc->pid, tc->test_sig));
        if (TST_RET != -1) {
                tst_res(TFAIL, "kill should fail but not, return %ld",
TST_RET);
@@ -51,14 +44,19 @@ static void verify_kill(unsigned int n)
                tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "kill expected %s but got",
                        tst_strerrno(tc->exp_errno));

-       if (tc->child_flag) {
+       if (real_pid) {
                cleanup();
                real_pid = 0;
        }
+
 }

 static void setup(void)
 {
+       real_pid = SAFE_FORK();
+       if (!real_pid)
+               pause();
+
        fake_pid = tst_get_unused_pid();
        int_min_pid = INT_MIN;
 }
Yang Xu Aug. 21, 2020, 2:21 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Li


> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:18 AM Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com 
> <mailto:xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Li
> 
> 
>      >
>      > Feiyu Zhu <zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com
>     <mailto:zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> <mailto:zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com
>     <mailto:zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>>> wrote:
>      >
>      >     ...
>      >     +#include <unistd.h>
>      >     +#include "tst_test.h"
>      >     +
>      >     +static pid_t real_pid, fake_pid, int_min_pid;
>      >     +static void cleanup(void);
>      >     +
>      >     +static struct tcase {
>      >     +       int test_sig;
>      >     +       int exp_errno;
>      >     +       int child_flag;
>      >
>      >
>      > The child_flag field is not necessary, we could prepare a real
>     child in
>      > setup()
>      > and reclaim it after testing via check the real_pid value, that
>     will be
>      > more easily.
>     When I reviewed this patch in internal, I had the same idea. But when I
>     try it and this case will hang because sub test will wait children
>     finished by using tst_reap_childrens below:
> 
>     lib/tst_test.c
>     static void run_tests(void)
>     {
>              ...
>               for (i = 0; i < tst_test->tcnt; i++) {
>                       saved_results = *results;
>                       tst_test->test(i);
> 
>                       if (getpid() != main_pid) {
>                               exit(0);
>                       }
> 
>                       tst_reap_children();
> 
>                       if (results_equal(&saved_results, results))
>                               tst_brk(TBROK, "Test %i haven't reported
>     results!", i);
>               }
> 
> 
>     }
> 
>     Also, we can use the current process id but it may has unexpected
>     result
>     when kill succeed. So fork a child to test maybe a better solution.
> 
> 
> Hmm, sorry for the uncleared description, actually I meant, to use real_pid
> instead of the tc->child_flag directly, then start to reclaim the child 
> when the
> real_pid test finishing.
> 
> Does this below diff work for you?
It looks well. But the real_pid only valid when the first sub test and 
the real pid is equals to 0 when using -i parameters because we have 
killed this children.

For pid = 0, it means  then sig is sent to every process in the process 
group of the calling process.  So it looks like we test different thing 
when using -i parameters.  What do you think about this?
> 
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill03.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill03.c
> @@ -21,24 +21,17 @@ static void cleanup(void);
>   static struct tcase {
>          int test_sig;
>          int exp_errno;
> -       int child_flag;
>          pid_t *pid;
>   } tcases[] = {
> -       {2000, EINVAL, 1, &real_pid},
> -       {SIGKILL, ESRCH, 0, &fake_pid},
> -       {SIGKILL, ESRCH, 0, &int_min_pid}
> +       {2000, EINVAL, &real_pid},
> +       {SIGKILL, ESRCH, &fake_pid},
> +       {SIGKILL, ESRCH, &int_min_pid}
>   };
> 
>   static void verify_kill(unsigned int n)
>   {
>          struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
> 
> -       if (tc->child_flag) {
> -               real_pid = SAFE_FORK();
> -               if (!real_pid)
> -                       pause();
> -       }
> -
>          TEST(kill(*tc->pid, tc->test_sig));
>          if (TST_RET != -1) {
>                  tst_res(TFAIL, "kill should fail but not, return %ld", 
> TST_RET);
> @@ -51,14 +44,19 @@ static void verify_kill(unsigned int n)
>                  tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "kill expected %s but got",
>                          tst_strerrno(tc->exp_errno));
> 
> -       if (tc->child_flag) {
> +       if (real_pid) {
>                  cleanup();
>                  real_pid = 0;
>          }
> +
>   }
> 
>   static void setup(void)
>   {
> +       real_pid = SAFE_FORK();
> +       if (!real_pid)
> +               pause();
> +
>          fake_pid = tst_get_unused_pid();
>          int_min_pid = INT_MIN;
>   }
> -- 
> Regards,
> Li Wang
Li Wang Aug. 21, 2020, 3:16 a.m. UTC | #5
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:22 AM Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
wrote:

> ...
> >     Also, we can use the current process id but it may has unexpected
> >     result
> >     when kill succeed. So fork a child to test maybe a better solution.
> >
> >
> > Hmm, sorry for the uncleared description, actually I meant, to use
> real_pid
> > instead of the tc->child_flag directly, then start to reclaim the child
> > when the
> > real_pid test finishing.
> >
> > Does this below diff work for you?
> It looks well. But the real_pid only valid when the first sub test and
> the real pid is equals to 0 when using -i parameters because we have
> killed this children.
>

Yes, you're right.
How about moving up the real_pid creator to the main process? does it work
for you?

static void verify_kill(unsigned int n)
{
        if (!real_pid) {
                real_pid = SAFE_FORK();
                if (!real_pid)
                        pause();
        }

        TEST(kill(*tc->pid, tc->test_sig));
        ...

        if (real_pid) {
                cleanup();
                real_pid = 0;
        }

}


>
> For pid = 0, it means  then sig is sent to every process in the process
> group of the calling process.  So it looks like we test different thing
> when using -i parameters.  What do you think about this?
>

I even think it is a good idea for code simplification:). In this case, the
first
the subtest is just to verify invalid signal for kill(), it doesn't matter
to go with
kill(0, invalid_signal), that only tries to kill the current main process.
isn't it?

If we go this way, not only the tc->child_flag is no needed, but also not
necessary
to fork a new child to be killed.
Yang Xu Aug. 21, 2020, 3:34 a.m. UTC | #6
Hi Li
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:22 AM Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com 
> <mailto:xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>> wrote:
> 
>     ...
>      >     Also, we can use the current process id but it may has unexpected
>      >     result
>      >     when kill succeed. So fork a child to test maybe a better
>     solution.
>      >
>      >
>      > Hmm, sorry for the uncleared description, actually I meant, to
>     use real_pid
>      > instead of the tc->child_flag directly, then start to reclaim the
>     child
>      > when the
>      > real_pid test finishing.
>      >
>      > Does this below diff work for you?
>     It looks well. But the real_pid only valid when the first sub test and
>     the real pid is equals to 0 when using -i parameters because we have
>     killed this children.
> 
> 
> Yes, you're right.
> How about moving up the real_pid creator to the main process? does it 
> work for you?
> 
> static void verify_kill(unsigned int n)
> {
>          if (!real_pid) {
>                  real_pid = SAFE_FORK();
>                  if (!real_pid)
>                          pause();
>          }
> 
>          TEST(kill(*tc->pid, tc->test_sig));
> ...
> 
>          if (real_pid) {
>                  cleanup();
>                  real_pid = 0;
>          }
> 
> }
> 
Yes, it looks ok,
> 
>     For pid = 0, it means  then sig is sent to every process in the process
>     group of the calling process.  So it looks like we test different thing
>     when using -i parameters.  What do you think about this?
> 
> 
> I even think it is a good idea for code simplification:). In this case, 
> the first
> the subtest is just to verify invalid signal for kill(), it doesn't 
> matter to go with
> kill(0, invalid_signal), that only tries to kill the current main 
> process. isn't it?
Yes. I think using current process id instead of 0 is more easier 
because the invalid signal can't kill process forever.

static void setup(void)
{
         real_pid = getpid();
         fake_pid = tst_get_unused_pid();
         int_min_pid = INT_MIN;
}

> 
> If we go this way, not only the tc->child_flag is no needed, but also 
> not necessary
> to fork a new child to be killed.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Li Wang
Li Wang Aug. 21, 2020, 3:43 a.m. UTC | #7
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:34 AM Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
wrote:

> ...
> Yes. I think using current process id instead of 0 is more easier
> because the invalid signal can't kill process forever.
>
> static void setup(void)
> {
>          real_pid = getpid();
>

Agreed!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
index 5e2bdb1..a6ab75b 100644
--- a/runtest/syscalls
+++ b/runtest/syscalls
@@ -616,7 +616,6 @@  kcmp03 kcmp03
 
 kill02 kill02
 kill03 kill03
-kill04 kill04
 kill05 kill05
 kill06 kill06
 kill07 kill07
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/.gitignore
index b62662f..75fdaa5 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/.gitignore
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/.gitignore
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ 
 /kill02
 /kill03
-/kill04
 /kill05
 /kill06
 /kill07
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill03.c
index 5770ae0..21be09f 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill03.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill03.c
@@ -1,165 +1,80 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
 /*
+ * Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2001
  *
- *   Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2001
- *
- *   This program is free software;  you can redistribute it and/or modify
- *   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
- *   the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
- *   (at your option) any later version.
- *
- *   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
- *   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY;  without even the implied warranty of
- *   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See
- *   the GNU General Public License for more details.
- *
- *   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- *   along with this program;  if not, write to the Free Software
- *   Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
- */
-
-/*
- * NAME
- *	kill03.c
- *
- * DESCRIPTION
- *	Test case to check that kill fails when given an invalid signal.
- *
- * ALGORITHM
- *	call setup
- *	loop if the -i option was given
- *	fork a child
- *	execute the kill system call with an invalid signal
- *	check the return value
- *	if return value is not -1
- *		issue a FAIL message, break remaining tests and cleanup
- *	if we are doing functional testing
- *		if the errno was set to 22 (invalid argument).
- *			issue a PASS message
- *		otherwise
- *			issue a FAIL message
- *	call cleanup
- *
- * USAGE
- *  kill03 [-c n] [-f] [-i n] [-I x] [-P x] [-t]
- *     where,  -c n : Run n copies concurrently.
- *             -f   : Turn off functionality Testing.
- *             -i n : Execute test n times.
- *             -I x : Execute test for x seconds.
- *             -P x : Pause for x seconds between iterations.
- *             -t   : Turn on syscall timing.
+ * 1) kill() fails with errno set to EINVAL if given an invalid signal.
+ * 2) kill() fails with errno set to ESRCH if given a non-existent pid.
+ * 3) kill() fails with errno set to ESRCH if the given pid is INT_MIN.
  *
  * HISTORY
  *	07/2001 Ported by Wayne Boyer
- *
- * RESTRICTIONS
- *	none
  */
 
-#include "test.h"
-
+#include <sys/types.h>
 #include <signal.h>
-#include <errno.h>
-#include <sys/wait.h>
-
-void cleanup(void);
-void setup(void);
-void do_child(void);
-
-char *TCID = "kill03";
-int TST_TOTAL = 1;
-
-#define TEST_SIG 2000
-
-int main(int ac, char **av)
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+static pid_t real_pid, fake_pid, int_min_pid;
+static void cleanup(void);
+
+static struct tcase {
+	int test_sig;
+	int exp_errno;
+	int child_flag;
+	pid_t *pid;
+} tcases[] = {
+	{2000, EINVAL, 1, &real_pid},
+	{SIGKILL, ESRCH, 0, &fake_pid},
+	{SIGKILL, ESRCH, 0, &int_min_pid}
+};
+
+static void verify_kill(unsigned int n)
 {
-	int lc;
-	pid_t pid;
-	int exno, status;
-
-	tst_parse_opts(ac, av, NULL, NULL);
-#ifdef UCLINUX
-	maybe_run_child(&do_child, "");
-#endif
+	struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
 
-	setup();
-
-	/* The following loop checks looping state if -i option given */
-	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
-
-		/* reset tst_count in case we are looping */
-		tst_count = 0;
-		status = 1;
-		exno = 1;
-		pid = FORK_OR_VFORK();
-		if (pid < 0) {
-			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Fork of child failed");
-		} else if (pid == 0) {
-#ifdef UCLINUX
-			if (self_exec(av[0], "") < 0) {
-				tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup,
-					 "self_exec of child failed");
-			}
-#else
-			do_child();
-#endif
-		} else {
-			TEST(kill(pid, TEST_SIG));
-			kill(pid, SIGKILL);
-			waitpid(pid, &status, 0);
-		}
+	if (tc->child_flag) {
+		real_pid = SAFE_FORK();
+		if (!real_pid)
+			pause();
+	}
+
+	TEST(kill(*tc->pid, tc->test_sig));
+	if (TST_RET != -1) {
+		tst_res(TFAIL, "kill should fail but not, return %ld", TST_RET);
+		return;
+	}
 
-		if (TEST_RETURN != -1) {
-			tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup, "%s failed - errno = %d : %s "
-				 "Expected a return value of -1 got %ld",
-				 TCID, TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO),
-				 TEST_RETURN);
-		}
+	if (tc->exp_errno == TST_ERR)
+		tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO, "kill failed as expected");
+	else
+		tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "kill expected %s but got",
+			tst_strerrno(tc->exp_errno));
 
-		/*
-		 * Check to see if the errno was set to the expected
-		 * value of 22 : EINVAL.
-		 */
-		if (TEST_ERRNO == EINVAL) {
-			tst_resm(TPASS, "errno set to %d : %s, as "
-				 "expected", TEST_ERRNO,
-				 strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
-		} else {
-			tst_resm(TFAIL, "errno set to %d : %s expected "
-				 "%d : %s", TEST_ERRNO,
-				 strerror(TEST_ERRNO), 22,
-				 strerror(22));
-		}
+	if (tc->child_flag) {
+		cleanup();
+		real_pid = 0;
 	}
-
-	cleanup();
-	tst_exit();
 }
 
-/*
- * do_child()
- */
-void do_child(void)
+static void setup(void)
 {
-	int exno = 1;
-
-	pause();
-	exit(exno);
+	fake_pid = tst_get_unused_pid();
+	int_min_pid = INT_MIN;
 }
 
-/*
- * setup() - performs all ONE TIME setup for this test
- */
-void setup(void)
+static void cleanup(void)
 {
-
-	TEST_PAUSE;
+	if (real_pid > 0) {
+		SAFE_KILL(real_pid, SIGKILL);
+		SAFE_WAIT(NULL);
+	}
 }
 
-/*
- * cleanup() - performs all the ONE TIME cleanup for this test at completion
- * or premature exit.
- */
-void cleanup(void)
-{
-
-}
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.test = verify_kill,
+	.tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
+	.setup = setup,
+	.cleanup = cleanup,
+	.forks_child = 1,
+};
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill04.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill04.c
deleted file mode 100644
index f3bec13..0000000
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill04.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,133 +0,0 @@ 
-/*
- *
- *   Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2001
- *
- *   This program is free software;  you can redistribute it and/or modify
- *   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
- *   the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
- *   (at your option) any later version.
- *
- *   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
- *   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY;  without even the implied warranty of
- *   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See
- *   the GNU General Public License for more details.
- *
- *   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- *   along with this program;  if not, write to the Free Software
- *   Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
- */
-
-/*
- * NAME
- *	kill04.c
- *
- * DESCRIPTION
- *	Test case to check that kill() fails when passed a non-existant pid.
- *
- * ALGORITHM
- *	call setup
- *	loop if the -i option was given
- *	fork a child
- *	execute the kill system call with a non-existant PID
- *	check the return value
- *	if return value is not -1
- *		issue a FAIL message, break remaining tests and cleanup
- *	if we are doing functional testing
- *		if the errno was set to 3 (No such proccess)
- *			issue a PASS message
- *		otherwise
- *			issue a FAIL message
- *	call cleanup
- *
- * USAGE
- *  kill04 [-c n] [-f] [-i n] [-I x] [-P x] [-t]
- *     where,  -c n : Run n copies concurrently.
- *             -f   : Turn off functionality Testing.
- *             -i n : Execute test n times.
- *             -I x : Execute test for x seconds.
- *             -P x : Pause for x seconds between iterations.
- *             -t   : Turn on syscall timing.
- *
- * HISTORY
- *	07/2001 Ported by Wayne Boyer
- *
- * RESTRICTIONS
- *	This test should be run by a non-root user
- */
-
-#include "test.h"
-
-#include <signal.h>
-#include <errno.h>
-#include <sys/wait.h>
-
-void cleanup(void);
-void setup(void);
-void do_child(void);
-
-char *TCID = "kill04";
-int TST_TOTAL = 1;
-
-#define TEST_SIG SIGKILL
-
-int main(int ac, char **av)
-{
-	int lc;
-	pid_t fake_pid;
-
-	tst_parse_opts(ac, av, NULL, NULL);
-
-	setup();
-
-	/* The following loop checks looping state if -i option given */
-	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
-
-		/* reset tst_count in case we are looping */
-		tst_count = 0;
-
-		fake_pid = tst_get_unused_pid(cleanup);
-		TEST(kill(fake_pid, TEST_SIG));
-
-		if (TEST_RETURN != -1) {
-			tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup, "%s failed - errno = %d : %s "
-				 "Expected a return value of -1 got %ld",
-				 TCID, TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO),
-				 TEST_RETURN);
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * Check to see if the errno was set to the expected
-		 * value of 3 : ESRCH
-		 */
-		if (TEST_ERRNO == ESRCH) {
-			tst_resm(TPASS, "errno set to %d : %s, as "
-				 "expected", TEST_ERRNO,
-				 strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
-		} else {
-			tst_resm(TFAIL, "errno set to %d : %s expected "
-				 "%d : %s", TEST_ERRNO,
-				 strerror(TEST_ERRNO), 3, strerror(3));
-		}
-	}
-
-	cleanup();
-	tst_exit();
-}
-
-/*
- * setup() - performs all ONE TIME setup for this test
- */
-void setup(void)
-{
-
-	TEST_PAUSE;
-}
-
-/*
- * cleanup() - performs all the ONE TIME cleanup for this test at completion
- * or premature exit.
- */
-void cleanup(void)
-{
-
-}