From patchwork Thu Sep 21 15:55:28 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mark Brown X-Patchwork-Id: 816990 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xyh8K2Wq9z9t42 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 01:57:37 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sirena.org.uk header.i=@sirena.org.uk header.b="gZ36pZCj"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3xyh8K1DZLzDrJ5 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 01:57:37 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sirena.org.uk header.i=@sirena.org.uk header.b="gZ36pZCj"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=neutral (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=sirena.co.uk (client-ip=2a01:7e01::f03c:91ff:fed4:a3b6; helo=heliosphere.sirena.org.uk; envelope-from=broonie@sirena.co.uk; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sirena.org.uk header.i=@sirena.org.uk header.b="gZ36pZCj"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk (heliosphere.sirena.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:7e01::f03c:91ff:fed4:a3b6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3xyh6F1NmqzDqT0 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 01:55:48 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To: Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References: List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner: List-Archive; bh=BmQGSbF5ylrExlNi17ZFEEojx34XCW5pDIPhgQVJPyg=; b=gZ36pZCj/GHP E2Pr7Wufe3fVN8S4eBeKYcT0b+oPHnToxfMK6oL5npvAQJI6J40M8FG18yRLUVLEATI5H7fb8w35/ deCPQJ1u0oujVTa5l2I2ZQkz79/rCqqkO4r9P7EczCZa0/ZYcVGz7DgigqArXfbTVTyzEhITT9SID QVVQc=; Received: from debutante.sirena.org.uk ([2001:470:1f1d:6b5::3] helo=debutante) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dv3p3-0007i8-4J; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:55:29 +0000 Received: from broonie by debutante with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dv3p2-0006Lg-0Q; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:55:28 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Arvind Yadav Subject: Applied "ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Handle return value of devm_kasprintf" to the asoc tree In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:55:28 +0100 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.com, timur@tabi.org, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, fabio.estevam@nxp.com, perex@perex.cz, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The patch ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Handle return value of devm_kasprintf has been applied to the asoc tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark From 7add71b623a2b2abc2e0947a21fb31e2c8f71e18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arvind Yadav Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:50:03 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Handle return value of devm_kasprintf devm_kasprintf() can fail here and we must check its return value. Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c index 3772abbdd7b7..1225e0399de8 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c @@ -639,6 +639,10 @@ static int fsl_asoc_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "ac97-codec.%u", (unsigned int)idx); + if (!priv->dai_link[0].codec_name) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto asrc_fail; + } } priv->dai_link[0].platform_of_node = cpu_np;