From patchwork Mon Mar 25 14:56:42 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baoquan He X-Patchwork-Id: 1915687 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UAARgC5L; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UAARgC5L; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V3GPw060yz1yXy for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 02:02:43 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UAARgC5L; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UAARgC5L; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V3GPv4nmJz3vs4 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 02:02:43 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UAARgC5L; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UAARgC5L; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.129.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=bhe@redhat.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V3GHx0TlNz3vhj for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:57:32 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1711378650; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/wvoO9gMxnE/h+72mDdUoxwDkamBxujn5JY0mQMrkk8=; b=UAARgC5Lq9+648tqMb7yuqXxLB4mJ30U1QL8wqpXUssmUz6it4xMVXfK6dAoMR6JOJAK2A 66BBS0TDcjNT8Hd2KScmB1trlAF1zE6Bo38iff7G54s5dZOtP325bduj4+mLs7G/p1+UeP kKvwzBUCF5hqWJZLS9nwaAU/0OoO0IQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1711378650; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/wvoO9gMxnE/h+72mDdUoxwDkamBxujn5JY0mQMrkk8=; b=UAARgC5Lq9+648tqMb7yuqXxLB4mJ30U1QL8wqpXUssmUz6it4xMVXfK6dAoMR6JOJAK2A 66BBS0TDcjNT8Hd2KScmB1trlAF1zE6Bo38iff7G54s5dZOtP325bduj4+mLs7G/p1+UeP kKvwzBUCF5hqWJZLS9nwaAU/0OoO0IQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-207-ioNvZiFePKuhU6aVg6cs7g-1; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:57:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ioNvZiFePKuhU6aVg6cs7g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38444185A783; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from MiWiFi-R3L-srv.redhat.com (unknown [10.72.116.12]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4133C22; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:57:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Baoquan He To: linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] mm/mm_init.c: remove the useless dma_reserve Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:56:42 +0800 Message-ID: <20240325145646.1044760-3-bhe@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240325145646.1044760-1-bhe@redhat.com> References: <20240325145646.1044760-1-bhe@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.1 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Baoquan He , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, rppt@kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Now nobody calls set_dma_reserve() to set value for dma_reserve, remove set_dma_reserve(), global variable dma_reserve and the codes using it. Signed-off-by: Baoquan He Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- include/linux/mm.h | 1 - mm/mm_init.c | 23 ----------------------- 2 files changed, 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 0436b919f1c7..ad19350e1538 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -3210,7 +3210,6 @@ static inline int early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn) extern int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn); #endif -extern void set_dma_reserve(unsigned long new_dma_reserve); extern void mem_init(void); extern void __init mmap_init(void); diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c index 549e76af8f82..153fb2dc666f 100644 --- a/mm/mm_init.c +++ b/mm/mm_init.c @@ -226,7 +226,6 @@ static unsigned long required_movablecore_percent __initdata; static unsigned long nr_kernel_pages __initdata; static unsigned long nr_all_pages __initdata; -static unsigned long dma_reserve __initdata; static bool deferred_struct_pages __meminitdata; @@ -1583,12 +1582,6 @@ static void __init free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat) zone_names[j], memmap_pages, freesize); } - /* Account for reserved pages */ - if (j == 0 && freesize > dma_reserve) { - freesize -= dma_reserve; - pr_debug(" %s zone: %lu pages reserved\n", zone_names[0], dma_reserve); - } - if (!is_highmem_idx(j)) nr_kernel_pages += freesize; /* Charge for highmem memmap if there are enough kernel pages */ @@ -2547,22 +2540,6 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename, return table; } -/** - * set_dma_reserve - set the specified number of pages reserved in the first zone - * @new_dma_reserve: The number of pages to mark reserved - * - * The per-cpu batchsize and zone watermarks are determined by managed_pages. - * In the DMA zone, a significant percentage may be consumed by kernel image - * and other unfreeable allocations which can skew the watermarks badly. This - * function may optionally be used to account for unfreeable pages in the - * first zone (e.g., ZONE_DMA). The effect will be lower watermarks and - * smaller per-cpu batchsize. - */ -void __init set_dma_reserve(unsigned long new_dma_reserve) -{ - dma_reserve = new_dma_reserve; -} - void __init memblock_free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn, unsigned int order) {