From patchwork Mon Jun 12 21:04:23 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Vishal Moola X-Patchwork-Id: 1794183 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20221208 header.b=mPREwt4C; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Qg4hB6KjHz20Wq for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:34:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20221208 header.b=mPREwt4C; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Qg4hB3NVqz3dFk for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:34:18 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20221208 header.b=mPREwt4C; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::112c; helo=mail-yw1-x112c.google.com; envelope-from=vishal.moola@gmail.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mail-yw1-x112c.google.com (mail-yw1-x112c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Qg43S1395z30fk for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:05:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-yw1-x112c.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-565aa2cc428so40620847b3.1 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:05:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686603955; x=1689195955; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=8ky1uDH3HAwvFTnah34UfzHSGIz5XtPXejf2e4vlCZQ=; b=mPREwt4CZ7eyjP0awRF+7J59gjRJfQYSldhgYFU3GX8JHbZALGX3vT3PNPPDkSpada kYBrPZ3fT3IHCrmgBacTa14fpMsdfLY/wfMsw3mbb6xXz9ObJPsrzVS2jkFBCphqvrnl W2C3CK1LTKvQS4G7ilQBgC608IiFiwIK0aJZOApjzUoXUMUFaYyvbn2berfE8dovgnlw G/g86Ig9l0whUW2/5Qd6SZuVXZ3fDYfyaml8bSeL/n/Mla1l5cRkRmXZyiI9FghcycAP +JJqIE8dynwBhJPRmXp4HhikHugb2xp+HYDNKHli1SWflPjzo5LK7t0+7e7QbCiwECv3 X+rQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686603955; x=1689195955; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8ky1uDH3HAwvFTnah34UfzHSGIz5XtPXejf2e4vlCZQ=; b=BSC5/gDuEo1uGmFJQsipjfGrEO06VwLzjVNZXseAFNGdNv6FAORgM+WVD9smHQUUsH kkes4xDEGeyBax2/O7mmmv+OEX+3Vuaimhu3D4EXCbbEjSyoW9AQ2mI7Z9Yay7sLMuxB wDcxnlbnxiWuaokyPYi7vy+JCOmvMsupSL1cRb1YwTMYNrYy/jWl7LEOhO2pw/nTiGbi YDyb9diTmkUQD0aB/e1wA4s1t0U8c16bB56v0zAkYjGlgHzV6vaJi1h9fgtIA0RBKpEs R4Nv1CLS0dFXYn+AIkO0pv8iiuIpL+/Ibt2ItPNVHk6BSzMu9+PBsBatVAHtPSdv8wuP 4BTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDytnCi8mO3PU1/lAkCy/URGPJDcuONenP0Qo4tINmqbpLzT4Vwf xGQ09ahd/uOJBKiJfWp5vZw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6hpYtRh2B57fGd8bPmVf+MLwfrVY1EUXTrrFmJrCanxRRmSJ+wngffzdYGMbXJAYdrr0DA1A== X-Received: by 2002:a81:9e13:0:b0:56d:4b17:7e9c with SMTP id m19-20020a819e13000000b0056d4b177e9cmr1826324ywj.32.1686603955490; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknowna0e70b2ca394.attlocal.net ([2600:1700:2f7d:1800::16]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s125-20020a817783000000b00569eb609458sm2757115ywc.81.2023.06.12.14.05.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:05:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" To: Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox Subject: [PATCH v4 34/34] mm: Remove pgtable_{pmd, pte}_page_{ctor, dtor}() wrappers Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:04:23 -0700 Message-Id: <20230612210423.18611-35-vishal.moola@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20230612210423.18611-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> References: <20230612210423.18611-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, "Vishal Moola \(Oracle\)" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Hugh Dickins , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" These functions are no longer necessary. Remove them and cleanup Documentation referencing them. Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst | 12 +++++------ .../zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst | 14 ++++++------- include/linux/mm.h | 20 ------------------- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst b/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst index 50ee0dfc95be..4bffec728340 100644 --- a/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst +++ b/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Support of split page table lock by an architecture =================================================== There's no need in special enabling of PTE split page table lock: everything -required is done by pgtable_pte_page_ctor() and pgtable_pte_page_dtor(), which +required is done by pagetable_pte_ctor() and pagetable_pte_dtor(), which must be called on PTE table allocation / freeing. Make sure the architecture doesn't use slab allocator for page table @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ This field shares storage with page->ptl. PMD split lock only makes sense if you have more than two page table levels. -PMD split lock enabling requires pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() call on PMD table -allocation and pgtable_pmd_page_dtor() on freeing. +PMD split lock enabling requires pagetable_pmd_ctor() call on PMD table +allocation and pagetable_pmd_dtor() on freeing. Allocation usually happens in pmd_alloc_one(), freeing in pmd_free() and pmd_free_tlb(), but make sure you cover all PMD table allocation / freeing @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ paths: i.e X86_PAE preallocate few PMDs on pgd_alloc(). With everything in place you can set CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. -NOTE: pgtable_pte_page_ctor() and pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() can fail -- it must +NOTE: pagetable_pte_ctor() and pagetable_pmd_ctor() can fail -- it must be handled properly. page->ptl @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ trick: split lock with enabled DEBUG_SPINLOCK or DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, but costs one more cache line for indirect access; -The spinlock_t allocated in pgtable_pte_page_ctor() for PTE table and in -pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() for PMD table. +The spinlock_t allocated in pagetable_pte_ctor() for PTE table and in +pagetable_pmd_ctor() for PMD table. Please, never access page->ptl directly -- use appropriate helper. diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst index 4fb7aa666037..a2c288670a24 100644 --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst @@ -56,16 +56,16 @@ Hugetlb特定的辅助函数: 架构对分页表锁的支持 ==================== -没有必要特别启用PTE分页表锁：所有需要的东西都由pgtable_pte_page_ctor() -和pgtable_pte_page_dtor()完成，它们必须在PTE表分配/释放时被调用。 +没有必要特别启用PTE分页表锁：所有需要的东西都由pagetable_pte_ctor() +和pagetable_pte_dtor()完成，它们必须在PTE表分配/释放时被调用。 确保架构不使用slab分配器来分配页表：slab使用page->slab_cache来分配其页 面。这个区域与page->ptl共享存储。 PMD分页锁只有在你有两个以上的页表级别时才有意义。 -启用PMD分页锁需要在PMD表分配时调用pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()，在释放时调 -用pgtable_pmd_page_dtor()。 +启用PMD分页锁需要在PMD表分配时调用pagetable_pmd_ctor()，在释放时调 +用pagetable_pmd_dtor()。 分配通常发生在pmd_alloc_one()中，释放发生在pmd_free()和pmd_free_tlb() 中，但要确保覆盖所有的PMD表分配/释放路径：即X86_PAE在pgd_alloc()中预先 @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ PMD分页锁只有在你有两个以上的页表级别时才有意义。 一切就绪后，你可以设置CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK。 -注意：pgtable_pte_page_ctor()和pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()可能失败--必 +注意：pagetable_pte_ctor()和pagetable_pmd_ctor()可能失败--必 须正确处理。 page->ptl @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ page->ptl用于访问分割页表锁，其中'page'是包含该表的页面struc 的指针并动态分配它。这允许在启用DEBUG_SPINLOCK或DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC的 情况下使用分页锁，但由于间接访问而多花了一个缓存行。 -PTE表的spinlock_t分配在pgtable_pte_page_ctor()中，PMD表的spinlock_t -分配在pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()中。 +PTE表的spinlock_t分配在pagetable_pte_ctor()中，PMD表的spinlock_t +分配在pagetable_pmd_ctor()中。 请不要直接访问page->ptl - -使用适当的辅助函数。 diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index dc211c43610b..6d83483cf186 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -2897,11 +2897,6 @@ static inline bool pagetable_pte_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) return true; } -static inline bool pgtable_pte_page_ctor(struct page *page) -{ - return pagetable_pte_ctor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - static inline void pagetable_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc); @@ -2911,11 +2906,6 @@ static inline void pagetable_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE); } -static inline void pgtable_pte_page_dtor(struct page *page) -{ - pagetable_pte_dtor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - #define pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp) \ ({ \ spinlock_t *__ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd); \ @@ -3006,11 +2996,6 @@ static inline bool pagetable_pmd_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) return true; } -static inline bool pgtable_pmd_page_ctor(struct page *page) -{ - return pagetable_pmd_ctor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - static inline void pagetable_pmd_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc); @@ -3020,11 +3005,6 @@ static inline void pagetable_pmd_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE); } -static inline void pgtable_pmd_page_dtor(struct page *page) -{ - pagetable_pmd_dtor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - /* * No scalability reason to split PUD locks yet, but follow the same pattern * as the PMD locks to make it easier if we decide to. The VM should not be