[v4,3/7] KVM: PPC: Remove redundant kvm_run from vcpu_arch

The 'kvm_run' field already exists in the 'vcpu' structure, which
is the same structure as the 'kvm_run' in the 'vcpu_arch' and
should be deleted.

Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c        | 6 ++----
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c | 3 +--
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> writes:

> The 'kvm_run' field already exists in the 'vcpu' structure, which
> is the same structure as the 'kvm_run' in the 'vcpu_arch' and
> should be deleted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c        | 6 ++----
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c | 3 +--
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 1dc63101ffe1..2745ff8faa01 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -795,7 +795,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>  	struct mmio_hpte_cache_entry *pgfault_cache;
>  
>  	struct task_struct *run_task;
> -	struct kvm_run *kvm_run;
>  
>  	spinlock_t vpa_update_lock;
>  	struct kvmppc_vpa vpa;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 93493f0cbfe8..413ea2dcb10c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -2934,7 +2934,7 @@ static void post_guest_process(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc, bool is_master)
>  
>  		ret = RESUME_GUEST;
>  		if (vcpu->arch.trap)
> -			ret = kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(vcpu->arch.kvm_run, vcpu,
> +			ret = kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(vcpu->run, vcpu,
>  						    vcpu->arch.run_task);
>  
>  		vcpu->arch.ret = ret;
> @@ -3920,7 +3920,6 @@ static int kvmppc_run_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	spin_lock(&vc->lock);
>  	vcpu->arch.ceded = 0;
>  	vcpu->arch.run_task = current;
> -	vcpu->arch.kvm_run = kvm_run;
>  	vcpu->arch.stolen_logged = vcore_stolen_time(vc, mftb());
>  	vcpu->arch.state = KVMPPC_VCPU_RUNNABLE;
>  	vcpu->arch.busy_preempt = TB_NIL;
> @@ -3973,7 +3972,7 @@ static int kvmppc_run_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  			if (signal_pending(v->arch.run_task)) {
>  				kvmppc_remove_runnable(vc, v);
>  				v->stat.signal_exits++;
> -				v->arch.kvm_run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR;
> +				v->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR;
>  				v->arch.ret = -EINTR;
>  				wake_up(&v->arch.cpu_run);
>  			}
> @@ -4049,7 +4048,6 @@ int kvmhv_run_single_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run,
>  	vc = vcpu->arch.vcore;
>  	vcpu->arch.ceded = 0;
>  	vcpu->arch.run_task = current;
> -	vcpu->arch.kvm_run = kvm_run;
>  	vcpu->arch.stolen_logged = vcore_stolen_time(vc, mftb());
>  	vcpu->arch.state = KVMPPC_VCPU_RUNNABLE;
>  	vcpu->arch.busy_preempt = TB_NIL;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
> index dc97e5be76f6..5a3987f3ebf3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
> @@ -290,8 +290,7 @@ long kvmhv_enter_nested_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  			r = RESUME_HOST;
>  			break;
>  		}
> -		r = kvmhv_run_single_vcpu(vcpu->arch.kvm_run, vcpu, hdec_exp,
> -					  lpcr);
> +		r = kvmhv_run_single_vcpu(vcpu->run, vcpu, hdec_exp, lpcr);
>  	} while (is_kvmppc_resume_guest(r));
>  
>  	/* save L2 state for return */

FWIW,

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:35:10PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> The 'kvm_run' field already exists in the 'vcpu' structure, which
> is the same structure as the 'kvm_run' in the 'vcpu_arch' and
> should be deleted.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

This looks fine.

I assume each architecture sub-maintainer is taking the relevant
patches from this series via their tree - is that right?

Reviewed-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:35:10PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> The 'kvm_run' field already exists in the 'vcpu' structure, which
> is the same structure as the 'kvm_run' in the 'vcpu_arch' and
> should be deleted.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

Thanks, patches 3 and 4 of this series applied to my kvm-ppc-next branch.

Paul.

On 2020/5/27 12:20, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:35:10PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
>> The 'kvm_run' field already exists in the 'vcpu' structure, which
>> is the same structure as the 'kvm_run' in the 'vcpu_arch' and
>> should be deleted.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Thanks, patches 3 and 4 of this series applied to my kvm-ppc-next branch.
> 
> Paul.
> 

Thanks for your suggestion, for 5/7, I will submit a new version patch.

Thanks,
Tianjia